Dude. You're literally just firing a bunch of synapses right now. You're speaking and reading a bunch of letters, words, sentences, and phonemes (heh, if you even know what a phoneme is...). How can you know for sure your ideas are even OBJECTIVE, Chud? Oh shut the fuck up. I understand you want to talk about your trauma or something but you're literally stressing your adrenergic synaptic terminals. That's just your NMDA receptors talking, do you even know how your magnesium-pored glutamatergic receptors work? There might be too much of them somewhere, go get a fucking MRI. Do you even understand where your words are coming from right now? Holy shit. You let your ideas possess you SO BAD you clearly don't think for yourself lol you have no power left inside of you. Please do not talk to me unless you've studied Chomsky's syntactic structures. You're a postmodernist.
>>16936955physicalism is cancerdualism is canceridealism is cancer
>>16936961Yes, but don't floor that pedal too hard because you might get the "is cancer" cancer.
>>16936955chomsky raped aryan children on Epstein island
>>16936962cancer is cancer
>>16936961Process-Relationalism is love.Process-Relationalism is life.
>>16936975This is not science. This is AI gibberish. GTFO.
>>16936955I can confirm that the faggot in that picture is a faggot.
>>16936955aren't we in a era of brain cancer anon , I think we need to get something out of it then.
>>16936955I don't give a shit and I want your magical ethereous invisible-and-immaterial-yet-iverwhelmingly-existing sky-ghost ti APPEAR PHYSICALLY, CONCRETELY in FRONT OF ME in order to acknowledge his existence. As for physicalism or whatever: in fact I don't know what it is. It is true that science does not provide answer to some questions. And so what? Do YOU provide them (with evidence)?
>>16936975>atheism but uhhhhh heckin' wholesome and sheeeeeet
>>16936955>I hate psychoanalyses!!!>*psychoanalyzes*Women just can't help themselves.
>>16936967Based if true
>>16937008You have horridly misunderstood what I said. I never said that any of these events need to concretely appear in order for it to affect people. I said that the denial of this affect greatly reduces the subjective events of the psyche, whether there is God in the clouds or not. Scientists understand this; scientards on the other hand bootlick the physicalist approach and treat all of these experiences as meaningless and irrational, almost as if they will "cease to exist" as some kind of expired story that will eventually fall to the pundits and scribes of science. They are like children bitching about the world having no peace, "we should all be nice to each other, and we eventually will be!". Kindness will always set you free, just like the truth!>Do YOU provide them (with evidence)?There is enough evidence that we do not always function off pure evidence, there is enough evidence that the truth of a particular object is still a partial truth that neglects what it doesn't cover, there is enough evidence that one conception of truth can be dealt with in many different ways. But all from this universal basis of valid evidence and pure reason, faggots like you love to reduce everything to "if it is not truthful or evident, it shall not matter" and don't allow for any soul or imagination. r/Atheists are the exact same as forceful christcucks with their sheer will to truth (their sheer will to stomp one another with their ideal). You don't deserve to be part of any scientific inquiry if you reject the irrational elements of our experience, such a thought is irrational towards the irrational; the most irrational of all irrational thought, if anything.Truthfully, please go away.
>>16937026Jup. Very wholesome. :)
