Redpill me on Angela Collier
>>16939306Based af, that's all there is to say. Most of her haters are coping pop-sci faggots.
I like her most of the time, except for when she does the intellectually lazy but popular twitter hate mob stuff, such as acting like AI is doing nothing but plagiarism and harmful confirmation bias and no one should ever use it
>>16939323>AI is doing nothing but plagiarism and harmful confirmation bias and no one should ever use itit's true tho
>>16939323Yeah, I think she understands the select uses of AI and let's it go without saying, but she also isn't wrong about it infesting academia.
>>16939326I use chatbots a lot, but simply because they often give better results than search engines. Not because I want them to complement me or reinforce my preconceived notions, and I get annoyed and tell them to stop when they do
>>16939306her takes on ayn rand were retarded if not indicative that she never even read the very literature she was talking about, which is a huge red flag considering shes supposed to be a phd candidate. by the way, even the outspoken feminists who interpreted her work had a much more nuanced understanding.
>>16939306worthless opinion channel like millions of others, but with tits and a veneer of intellectualism.
>>16939306I like her but she's wrong about a lot. So was I when I was 25. She reminds me of me quite a bit. I'm lucky YouTube wasn't a thing when I was 25 and all my retarded hot takes are just on the nsa email repository.
>>16939403She's more like 38 years old I think
>>16939330I never got the whole using ai as a therapist, using it to flatter you thing its literally just a tool you ask it to tell you what you need and cite the sources then you close the tab.I have a feeling the people criticizing ai havent used the paid versions/haven't ever logged in to use the pro models and think theyre retarded when they can literally run code and use wolfram now.
Pseudo intellectual like every single Collier I've met.Might be genetic.
>>16939312The comments in this thread are increasingly verifying this.
>>16939306She's yet another Math/Physics grad who hit the postdoc wall and is having an existential crisis.Thankfully for her it seems like she found a way to make a living.
>>16939306She's the only physics youtuber who I've seen speak mostly accurately about physics. Some of her other opinions are a little normgroidal but overall I quite like her. She triggers a lot of people on 4chen as you can see.
>>16939721>speak mostly accurately about physicsyou must be pretty retarded if you seriously believe that
I'm a truck driver and angela's videos really help me feel like im not wasting my life away.
>>16939750Care to give me some examples?
>>16939306physics phd, that's dr. collier to you
insufferable
>>16939789
>>16940424I can't read your mind to see what retarded physics larper ideas you have that lead to you getting triggered by collier's videos.
>duude i fucking love watching some fat bitch with beaver teeth ramble for an hour on shit she learned the day before for every video
>>16939306Mid bitch who couldn't understand the principle behind a Dyson Sphere/Swarm so she thought it was a joke...
>>16939306nudes?
>>16941682Was just about to bring that one up too. She completely missed the point of a dyson swarm
>>16939306shes a fucking 5
>>16939312fpbp
>>16939306The real redpill is that if you want to go into science but anything she says is surprising, you don't know enough. Of course humanoid robots are a fucking stupid idea if you think about it for more than two seconds and know the fist thing about batteries.
>>16942651Lets say hypothetically you have a budget of $500. A humanoid robot costs $500 but so do the washing machine, autopilot subscription for a year, dishwasher, housemaid service for a year, lawn maintenance and snow removal.You could either get one those or get a humanoid robot for about the same price that can do all of them.
>>16939306You know how she has like a um...a butthole..? I want to be like, really deep in it. Like all the way into her small intestine. Like sucking on it for hours sort of stuff. I-I'd eat whatever comes out of it too and I'd like it! Yeah. So those are my thoughts! :)
>>16939306you can tell she wants to be a female hank green.
>>16943101Do people still like that guy? I remember hearing about some kind of Tiktok controversy he got himself into.
>>16943103yes he still gets millions of views explaining things with wikipedia level depth to normalfags.
>>16939306Astro people are insufferable. See Neil de Grass Tyson.
>>16939312she's the most popsci whore to get shilled into fame by the algorithm in a long time. Keep coping.
>>16939306She's cute and I agreed with just about every point in her Star Trek video.I don't care about anything else.
>>16939329>it infesting academiaacademia was infested long before "ai". maybe ai is a good gram stain
Good enough that I still watch her.Although her outlook on anything that's even remotely adjacent to Elon Musk is retarded.I hate Musk like the next guy, but she has absurd confidence in her takes - and her takes is always that new tech is futile and doesn't work.She also sees Nazis unironically everywhere. Even random physicists are suspected fascists for using German words in their papers.
Another crazy bitch.
>>16939403she's somewhere near the mid 30s>>16939306tows the line on rational and political shit until [insert thing] that goes outside her scope of ability to nuance hits her interest.a small nitpick as example: her video on flouride.Nobody disagrees that brushing your teeth is a good thing. But all she did was go on and on about enamel mineralization while, probably intentionally, ignoring any discussion on anything to do with flouride's other researched effects and why most other countries have banned it.
>>16943143Dilate and seethe, pop-sci niggoid.
>>16939306>Angela CollierShe likes black metal
>>16940509I got triggered by her video about some dead scientist where she says we have to delete him from history because he was a womanizer or some shit
>>16943938Irrelevant. We are talking about whether she speaks accurately about physics. Furthermore, if you're talking about the Feynman video, she didn't say that.
>>16943214It's toes the line retard.
>>16939306she owes me sex, but whenever she opens her mouth to talk it makes me soft.
I wish she knitted me a nice thinking hat.
>>16944775>pedantic bullshit instead of addressing the commentNTA but this is pathetic.
>>16939306stupid bitch tried to set the precedent of erasing dead people's names from their own scientific work, apparentlyi didn't really care about her one way or the other until she did that
>>16939306I watched with the sound down and Kleenex.
>>16945086Except if your downie ass actually watched the videos, you'd know she never did that.
Buy an ad stupid bitch
>>16945111I like that Astro Angela visits here.
those teeth give me boner
>>16939306typical midwit redditor who has a career as a low-level scientist that will probably get replaced by a.i. within 5 years
>>16939783thats weirdi enjoy trucking youtuber womancoincidence
>>16945353>muh aikys baboon
>>16945107that was the whole point of her fuckin two hour long feynman video
>>16945107No it wasn't. Watch the video, then get back to me.
>>16945356na she never disavowed him, only added nuance.
>>16945522She actually spent a lot of the video listing his merits that contribute to his relevance. She never went full tw*tter on Feynman.
>>16939306Do you think her mound is puffy?
>>16939403You do know that she could simply not make videos about things she doesn't understand, right?
>>16945353>midwit redditorthis perfectly encapsulates why I don't like her.
>>16945353>>16945616desu i prefer midwith redditors to you larping faggots at this point lol
>>16944932she can suck while it's softits called cock nursingand its really hot
>>16939306foid nigger
>>16939306too cute for /sci/must be protected so she doesnt stop making science slop
>>16944775I dont care anymore. I dont care about shit like that as its completely unimportant. Kill yourself.
>cuteBitch be the middest of mids even with all the upped make.
>>16939371Ayn rands writing is purile jewslop. Atlas shrugged is comically bad
>>16939306>Seethes about JWST not being named after a scientist James Webb contributed far more to the advancement of human spaceflight than any interchangeable scientist in recent memoryhas contributed to Astronomy. Scientific discoveries would likely be found by other scientists whereas there's an argument that if anyone else were NASA administrator the apollo programme may not have secured its funding.This is just seethe from a low level scientist who has no career advancement ahead of them
She owes me sex.
>>16945525dawg i don't care who she disavows, that would've been finelike i said, she tried to set the precedent of REMOVING HIS NAME from his own work posthumouslyno way in hell am i misremembering thisi don't give a shit about feynman personaly, and the video & "nuance-adding" was good
>>16939306I liked her up until a recent video where she laughed about guys who are losers so now I unironically can't watch her videos. She's generally right about other stuff though.
>>16942068Bump
>>16946807>>16945973This makes to much sense
>>16946829I'm not the first anon you posted
>>16939306Huge bbc slut
>>16939306Her take on AI is very shallow and full of lazy presumptions for someone who is supposedly a scientific method defender.
>>16944932Don't be fooled by make up. She's an uggo, that's why she's an actual nerd.
>>16939306She needs smug correction
>>16946856proof?
>>16946851Sorry Levi, Nobody cares.
>>16939545relative of Jacob?
>>16939306She made a really good star trek video.
>>16943132Chocolate Einstein is tolerable, although wrong.
>>16945600Yes
>>16941682>>16942515What is the point?That it takes a comical amount of resource investment that only a civilization of Gods could build, but is talked up by "futurists" like it's a practical goal?
i dont willingly watch videos with women in them unless its porn. does she do porn?
can anyone post a video of her where she actually does some physics instead of endless yapping?
I'm assuming people here don't like her because she's a left wing millennial woman
>>16942683Dude, you aren't making a humanoid robot that can do your chores for less than the price of a car.
>>16939306>6/10 on a good day>lazy breadtuber cancer videos with fake stumbling>subhuman simps will 1000x her fame and income neverthelessI fucking hate modern Internet
>>16952587A Dyson Swarm is just observing the endless expansion and growth of civilisation and pushing it to the point of “where does this eventually end? What’s the furthest point we can get to before we have nowhere else to go?” And that’s the Dyson Swarm. Where a civilisation has grown to such a scale it has devoured every single resource in its entire star system.
>>16939306Hotter/cuter version of Rebecca Watson
>>16939306>Blackpill me on Angela CollierShe just wants her piece of the $$$ pie. I don't think her channel is compelling enough to have any staying power. We'll know it's dying when she starts getting tattooed and flashing her hairy beaver.
>>16939306>goes on rant about thing>instead of actually understanding a thing based on an unbiased position where nuance comes onto the table, veers off into pop-left-aligned political rambling and personal gripes
>>16956028She may be the worst person in the Youtube "intellectual" space. Not just stupid, but an absolutely terrible person. Mean-spirited, petty, arrogant and self-centred. It actually took quite a while after I came across her channel for me to realise she was the one from the 'Elevatorgate' flame war back in the day, but when I did it clicked immediately because that is exactly the kind of person she is; take a completely innocuous encounter and reframe it to make it look like she was victimized. It is genuinely quite remarkable how she manages to have the wrong take on every single issue. Normally with left-wing commentators I have moments where I'm like: 'okay, I like them overall but I think they were wrong about this particular issue', or 'okay most of what this person says is way over the top but they're right about this issue'. Not her. She is the *worst*. She will even break from what other far leftists are saying just to find an even worse take. She's like the Republican stereotype of an angry blue-haired leftist.>>16939306Knows her stuff, quite smart, but it is very clear that the main reason she got into astrophysics and went to all the trouble of getting a doctorate was so she could prove to everyone how smart she was and sneer at her intellectual inferiors. No love for the subject in its own right, it's all about ego. At least, that's the vibe I get from her channel. Most channels by scientists, it's like 'omg, look at this cool new discovery in my field', with her it's a mix of 'look at these stupid people getting it wrong', or 'let me show you how smart I am by explaining this astrophysics concept that inferior scientists are explaining wrong'. You know the type; maybe a milder version of Thunderfoot.She's not stupid; I really liked her video on silicon-based life because she some hard science takes on the subject (although I'd still quibble with one or two points). But she feels like she'd be exhausting to be around irl.
>>16946856shes a 6, not exactly ugly, but struggling to make my 6.5 incher hard for sure
>>169562024 at max. 6 is deluded.
>>16956028I believe we should drop mf's like this into the center of Mogadishu and see how it pans out. Rocks will become rockets, heading straight for her uncovered (HARAM) head.
She's hot and cute
>>16956232she isnt a 4 objectively, 99% of this board is attracted to her so the men on here that have advanced degrees are usually 2 inchers with dysgenic genetics except for IQ and get horny for any chick that has regular features
her knowledge of even basic subjects like QM is incredibly shallow for a physics phd, althoug i suspect this is a systematic issue for astrotards
>>16943938I mean, the conclusion was more "the kinds of guys who idolise Feynman are weird and lame," so I'm sorry you're triggered about your crush or whatever.
>>16939306From what I've seen, she knows a lot about physics and not much about anything else. She did a video on the nobel prize for Insulin which was 90% good and then in the last 10% went on a hilariously stupid rant about how Big Pharma stole the patent for Insulin that Banting gave away for free and just charge money for doing nothing. This was AFTER she explained the Banting's original patent was for a method of extracting Insulin from dog pancreases and would be considered wildly unethical in today's world. Somehow those wires didn't connect in her head that modern insulin production is nothing like it was back then, or that corporations don't actually patent insulin itself, but production methods and medical formulations. She has lefty slop brain.
>>16956201>so she could prove to everyone how smart she was and sneer at her intellectual inferiorsThis is the correct reason to dislike her. She's haughty and mean spirited, and it comes across in her videos loud and clear no matter the topic.
>>16939323>>16943172AI produces negative results in whatever situation, industry, or arena you put it in. It's idiot boxes specifically for idiots.
>>16939306I used to not like her, but then she trashed Feynman, which made feynfags seethe. Now I like her.
>>16957440Bingo.She's clearly been telling herself since undergrad that the reason no one likes her is because she's a woman in a man's field and all the fragile male egos can't handle how smart she is, when in fact the reason no one likes her is just that she's condescending and self-centered. Ironically she's just the female version of arrogant, socially awkward male scientist she spends so much time seething over.
>>16957576And, she's wrong.
>>16957552holy based
>>16956679Bro you think you are a woman and you call me weird?
>>16943949I didn't talk about anything. I don't care how correct she is about physics. Its easy to be correct about something you study your whole life. The real deal is when it comes to original thoughts which, in her case, is "cancel this dead guy he made me feel insecure". Absolutely retarded woman
To all the horny freaks in this thread, SHE DOESN'T WANT YOU!! And always remember, whether it's an elevator ( >>16956028 / >>16956201 ) or a classroom, talking to a woman about shared interests alone is sexual harassment!
She's gonna turn 44 and realize Mother Nature intended her to have babies and create a happy and stress free home. By then, it'll be too late.
>>16958167Yeah, that's another thing I've noticed about her: totally lacking in empathy. For people in general, but especially men. >he knew it was inappropriate or he wouldn't have waited until we were aloneOr, he didn't want to make himself vulnerable in front of everyone, in case she shot him down. But she's never had to ask anyone else out before, so it doesn't occur to her that maybe he was just nervous; he *must* have been trying to get her alone to be nefarious.Every time she describes an interaction she's had with another person, her understanding of the other person's motivations and inner thoughts seems to be her trying to find the most negative explanation possible rather than, like, just trying to put herself in their shoes. She isn't as bad as >>16956028 (who is clearly grifting as well as permanently butthurt) but she's definitely one of that set of Millennial women whose dominance of social media is the main reason dating - and frankly every other human interaction - is so toxic nowadays.There are a lot of Millennial women whose standards for their own behavior are based on coastal, left-wing feminist values while their standards for other people's behavior towards them is based on conservative, red-state religious values. She can be as obnoxious and inconsiderate as she pleases because she's a strong, empowered woman and society has to deal with her as she is, but all the men around her had better treat her like she's a 19th century Southern debutante; do not even allude to sex in any context, only make advances in a formal, gentlemanly manner, and always be sure to step in should anyone else say something crass in her presence. My guess is that she was raised in a red state then moved to a blue state for college, or maybe a blue area of a red state; I think a lot of this problem comes from women raised in conservative environments moving to liberal areas and adapting to the culture change by cherry picking the bits they like from each.
>>16957922Reminder that if a white man made the same video and said "jew" a few more times you would actually watch it and then you would fellate him
>>16958276Yes, this is correct.
>>16958258I kind of like that women like her are selecting themselves out of the gene pool. Not every woman with a PhD is determined to make all human relationships as difficult as possible, and it's the easy-going ones who are breeding the next generation of academics. Nature is healing itself.
>>16939306watched a couple videos and those were enough to notice:> she's anti-AI meaning she CANT be that intelligent> according to her everybody talking about corruption in academia is just a bitter loser grifter (Sabrina Hofsteder, Eric Weinstein etc)so that makes it hard to take her takes seriously
>>16943177yeah she clearly has the leftism brain worm despite being more intelligent than a regular brainwashee
>>16959074What do you mean? All the people with genius-level IQ (145+) in my social circle despise AI. Me included.
>>16959090Who's gonna tell him?
>>16939306fact: she LOVES analshe actually greatly prefers itthis is said in her videos
>>16959097Tell me what, gayboy?
>>16957922If she had any original thoughts, she'd not have a youtube channel to talk to normies, she'd be too busy churning out papers.
>>16959090>calls himself a genius>uses anecdotal evidence in argument
>>16958276correct
>>16959333THIS. It's the case with all YouTubers whether it's: - movie reviewers (film school drop outs/unemployed in their field and refuse to take other jobs)- lawyers (disbarred or inexperienced)- science "communicators" (too lazy to finish a PhD/university drop outs thinking they're hot shit)- history/engineering (Wikipedia readers, typically same as above)
>>16959259Proof/Source? I wanna fap on out to the moment she actually says it!
>>16959090Why? It's literally being used to make scientific advancements by being able to come up with new ideas/concepts for humans to then consider since it has a bigger pool of information/knowledge to draw upon than any one human ever had.
>>16957444See, that's the type of dumb shit Angela will say, know it's popular enough among a hate mob that she won't lose subs over it
corr would shag angelas arse and titslegally consensually ofcourse
she got a new vidlookin' smokin'is diss just garn be an angela collier /general/
also check out charlotte moser uoutube channelgood science communicatormainly aimed at i guess math university studentsdont find most of what seen her sayin' cute but she hella cute
>>16939306she'll never have kids and i wonder how her personality will shift once she becomes fully self-aware about it
corr at the end if video she doubles down on the dyson fing
> (In the most naggy, cunty voice ever)> "Now here is why Richard Feynman was a stupid chud..."Her and hossenfelder are the token science girls. Hossenfelder says everything is bullshit and Collier is constantly criticizing everyone else while she sits in her stupid house. At least Hossenfelder doesn't just whine the entire time.
>>16939306She has the classic "I am going to turn this workplace into a moid concentration camp" phenotype
Her bust is meager in the latest video. Is she not aware of the debate about whether planes fly by pushing air down or by creating a pressure differential?
>>16960551Both
>>16960551Without bewbs,https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QKCK4lJLQHU&pp=ygUYQm9laW5nIGVuZ2luZWVyIGxlY3R1cmUg
>>16960551Really. Throughout the entire video she never explicitly says "they fly by creating a pressure differential around the wings". It makes her look like she doesn't actually know how planes fly and was just making the video to be snarky.
why did she make a video about how people complain there haven't been advances in foundational physics in half a century and then call them all morons while listing a bunch of tech that was built using 1930s theory
she comes across as desperate
thisis the type of chickwho took facials from the jocks during high school because she thought she was hot enough to be a cheerleaderdid that catholic guilt version of analhad an abortion at 17and almost did pornbet she has a tattoo somewhere that is her crown of sucking dicks
>>16941682Dyson also called his own paper a joke little buddy, he said he wrote it as a joke. Are you saying he also didn't understand what he wrote?
>>16961632Post a link to Dyson saying anywhere it was a joke, "little buddy", or FOAD. Courtesy of ChatGPT, Dyson only expressed some humor at how misunderstood the concept was, with many mistaking the premise for a rigid shell instead of a swarm. He never said it was a joke.
>>16958167>"weird and inappropiate" to ask a girl out in privateI hope her and all girls like her die alone and their cats take turns eating their remains.
>>16961661https://youtu.be/huAIfzUoyhUwatch 01:49-2:30 and 20:53-25:08
>>16958167>>16956201what do these women even want?if you aren't being coerced or pushed around then be flattered + say thanks + move along.
>>16961668>celebrated PhD pussies out to a literal who "journalist" rather than defend the idea his name is most associated withLow-T move. Thank God the vacuum cleaner company redeemed his moniker.
>>16961972>what do these women even want?It's this fucked up: they literally only want handsome, wealthy men to hit on them in some kind of a Hollywood "cute meet" situation. If anyone below their impossibly high standards so much as approaches them, they will call it "harassment". And they get angrier and angrier with every ensuing year that passes with Chad not paying them that fairytale visit. But even if Chad does visit, it's only because his dick did the thinking that night and he only wants a quickie...Chads want Stacies, not some fucking 5/10 mid, PhD or not.This does not make them willing to "settle" for a "lesser man". In fact, they get even more resentful that these males aren't Chad (the "one that got away") and shun them more, even as their eggs run out and they're now becoming long-term roommates with another Old Maid to meet expenses.We need AI powered waifus and to replace these incorrigible sows with axolotl tanks ASAP.
>>16960551I would like to see her go through various /sci/ physics meme puzzles.
>>16962113>AI powered waifusCan they look like Abby
>>16939306I like her. She has some good advice too.Her takes piss off some autists and techbros.
>>16943214>ignoring any discussion on anything to do with flouride's other researched effects and why most other countries have banned it?
>>16961668He doesn't really mean it was a joke, though. Or rather, the Dyson Sphere is a joke, but the Dyson Swarm was a legitimate proposal to help guide the search for extra-terrestrial life. It's not so much that it wasn't serious, but Dyson doesn't consider it part of his actual *work* work.>>16961972Attention. They want attention. They *always* want attention. They say 'omg being a woman in science is so tough I keep getting harassed by creepy men' and you are supposed to say 'omg that's so hard you're so brave I could never endure the suffering you have endured you are a saint'. Society gives men positive attention for being strong and proving their ability, while women get attention by being vulnerable and seeming like they're in need of help. So men do their best to hide their problems, and women do their best to exaggerate them. It's your basic martyr complex: they'll keep blowing the minor annoyances of everyday life out of proportion for as long as people keep giving them sympathy for it. >>16961144Firstly, no she doesn't in the slightest. She's way too stuck-up for that kind of thing. And the fact that you would think that probably means you have some issues you need to work on. Secondly, you're really only making her point about creepy, sex-obsessed men in science for her. >>16960431Hossenfelder genuinely seems to love science though. Her Youtube channel has gotten a little click-baity but you can tell she's actually interested in her field, and the only reason she spends so much of her time dumping on it is because she's frustrated that it's been overrun by politics and trends and very little actual science is getting done. Collier only does it so she can look down on everyone else. >>16961663Don't worry, anon, they will. Although I pity the cats who have to put up with them too. >>16960797>and was just making the video to be snarky.That seems to be the reason behind most of her videos.
>>16939306she'd make a great mom
>>16962227corr good post diss wun
>>16956005
lookangela NEEDSto do a public apology about how she is COMPLETELY wrongabout the dyson fing
>>16962276>obsessed with her own intelligence and credentials>always annoyed, very low patience for other peoplebruh, she's exactly the sort of woman who would mercilessly bully her own childrenshe'd fuck them up so bad