Scientifically speaking, is it ever a valid strategy to marry a single mom?
>>16943809yes. she will perform the most depraved sexual acts imaginable just so you stick around
>>16943809children can be an economic asset, get them classified as autistic and you get free government money
>>16943809biologically you failed because those kids aint carrying your genetic code
>>16943809Yes. She has genetics far better than yours' while you have excess resources at a level that providing for her children from the other male doesn't negatively impact you or the children you have with her. In that case, you get to mix your genetics with her superior genetics, increasing the odds of them being passed on for generations to come.
yes,
Evolution does not care why or how you pass along your genes, just as long as you do. If you are a 5'2 small dicked low IQ loser who marries a cheating whore that gets impregnanted with five sets of other men's triplets while with you but at the end manages to pop out one of your children, you are still more evolutionarily successful than a 7'0 gigadicked hyperchad with a genius IQ that didn't reproduce because he decided he didn't want kids.
>>16943809ONLY if she is a widow and the children are white.
>>16943809If she looks like that then yes. UwU Something something redheads are very pretty therefore the pain and lonliness in rejection I've felt is okay. Anyways, time for me now to keep being an incel I guess.
>>16943809>woman proven fertile>is this a good idea????You fucking retards - the only thing better is if you pull a Tom Cruise and kill the husband and take her for yourself
>>16945205I don't think she's still very fertile at 42.
did they?
>>16943809If the father died doing something respectable. That’s about it.
>>16943809Only if you get to put her old kids for adoption and she's willing to pump out 5 new ones for you. Raising another man's kids is chucked
>>16943809>Scientifically speaking, is it ever a valid strategy to marry a single mom?Scientificall ou just have to compare the divorce rates. >>16944174>Evolution does not care why or how you pass along your genes, just as long as you do. It obviously do not care that ou doo too. There is no reason to push that minimal variant on an billions of others. Even that will watered down the next generations in half, quarter, eighth .... usuall with the worst partners ou despise.-The whole "passing the genes" thing is dumb, trained illusion to trick you in the pay position.
>>16944158But your "grandchildren" willBingo
>>16943809Fuck I should've figured she had kids. She's way too hot to not have had any.
Clem from The Walking Dead is kind of a single mom and she's perfect It's not literally her kid, so she's still a virgin
>>16946233She's 16 you sick fuck
