https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00955-5
>>16944389>2026Wasn't this shit done in like 2014? I thought they fixed this.
>>16944394>I thought they fixed thislollmao
>>16944389>Social science>A boiling pot of shitLinguists would never not compare the two
>>16944389>nature>voting for Biden/Kamala is science
>>16944389/sci/ was also right about 99% of the “replication crisis” being social science bullshit
humans are unpredictable, cucks think they would understand how to 'epicly convince a female to have wholesome sex', gege
>>16944394>I thought they fixed this.What? No, it's continued to get worse. Now there's AIslop papers and AIslop reviewers so it's probably getting worse much faster than before.
/sci/ is never right about anything. it is 99% complete buffoons. However there are about 3 or 4 people here who actually know what they are talking about are always right. That is who you are referring too, not "sci"
>>16944622You statement is not supported by OP's post.
>>16944622>genuinely believes its just social sciences