That's cool as shit, man.
Space Engine
>no starsit's funny that to this very day they still need to adhere to the errors and goofs they made in that shitty staging back in 60s to keep the gimmick up
>>16950690
>>16950692
>>16950644why does this look so fucking fake?
>>16950718>anon spent all your life seeing the moon from the earth>anon never seen the far side of the moon>anon has likely never been in space or in moon's orbit>can't fathom the sun lighting the moon but the moon shadowing the earth>because it is fakeno one reason honestly
>>16950644this is AI
>>16950644>>16950679>>16950692it's been a long roadgettin from there to here
the moon's surface looks weird and wronglike it's too brown and cleanthat because i've only seen grainy 60s photos of the moon until now?
genuinely why does earth appear so close?
>>16950773the distance between earth and moon may to be the samebut the the earth is still much bigger than the moon
>>16950776but still, the original earthrise is much smaller, is the pic as close as it getsit looks like its right next to the surface bizarre
>>16950770Low light conditions and no atmosphere make it look really weird in contrast to Earth. Also the fact that you probably associate moon with how it looks from earth and how it looks in Apollo picks. Which is not only different style of photo and look but also the back side of the moon just looks different. >>16950773pic related.
>>16950644I love her so much.
what have the "moon access is impossible because of the van allen belt" people been saying about this
>>16950644just like in the mobies
>>16950799No change
>>16950802>downvoted
>>16950644
so what is being lit up in this photo? how is empty space scattering the light?
>>16950851Earth shine?
>>16950851the sun's atmosphere
>>16950851The moon has an atmosphere if very weak. Also the dust in the air of the moon.
>>16950644 >>16950832https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009288/art002e009288~orig.jpg>>16950692https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009298/art002e009298~orig.jpg>>16950838https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009289/art002e009289~orig.jpg>>16950843https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009299/art002e009299~orig.jpg>>16950846https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009282/art002e009282~orig.jpg>>16950847https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009283/art002e009283~orig.jpg>>16950851https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009301/art002e009301~orig.jpg
>>16950851>all those dead pixelsUh oh maybe the van halen bros were right after all...
>>16950851Alien bases?
>>16950851Gravity bending light?
>>16950780Apollo 8 was only 60 miles away from the moon, Artemis was 4000 miles away
>>16950851The outer edge of solar atmosphere where the corona transitions into the solar wind is defined by the Alfvén surface which forms an irregularly shaped boundary around the Sun at heights ranging from about 10 to 20 solar radii (7000000 to 14000000 km) above the photosphere.
>>16950773>>16950780>What is camera focal length>What is forced perspective
>>16950846*O*
>>16950925Saved
This one's even kinoer
so if the moon wasn't there, would artemis have travelled out to a point where it reached 0mph and then returned to earth?
>>16950802
>>16950947https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009287/art002e009287~orig.jpg
>>16950846
>>16950956Middle left
>>16950948Yes
This really is fucking cool. I love space so much.
>>16950925lol
>>16951099Yeeeees
>>16951099
>>16950690>Flat Earther-tards are allowed in the science board
>>16951299*reddit containment board
>>16951299looks like a moon landing denier to me not a flat earther
>>16951312Isn't there a giant overlap?
