I'll never reveal my scientific methods. Literally cry over not knowing something so amazing.How does it feel to you masters, that some scientist might simply not fall for your "get famous by publishing your scientific results" psyop? No, I will keep things to myself and exploit it to the max.
You talked to a chatbot, didn't you?
>>16953367Yeah, easier than reading textbooks.
>>16953534>>16953367The amount of AI psychosis schitzos showing up on /sci/ is in the last year is disturbing
>>16953542It's only disturbing if you have a hard time making social predictions or you're emotionally involved with this board any deeper than skimming threads or the occasional shitpost.Both would be clear signs of autism.
>>16953542AI told me the current science, from which I extrapolated before unknown causation mechanisms, which I unrigorously tested.
No one peer reviewed my finds because I didn't reveal them to anyone.Do you get it? I'm a world conqueror, my weapons are secret discoveries.
>>16953328>exploit it to the maxHow could you possibly hope to exploit your finding without revealing it to anyone?Secrecy does not exist in the current computer era. Literally the only way to keep a secret in this world right now is to never write it down, never digitize it in any form, and make mention of it to any living being. It's not possible to exploit or utilize anything under these conditions.Serious question, asking "for a friend"
