>mfw the Big Bang didn't create everything from nothing because space-time only emerged with the Planck Era and that goes against the Law of Conservation of Mass.>mfw the Law of Conservation of Mass makes Creatio Ex Nihilo impossible>mfw Genesis 1 is in total resonance with the Big Bang because it says the sky was light and darkness and the earth was formless and empty, that is, it was neither the sky nor the earth that we know/those that are referred to as created by God, but chaotic and pre-existing things that, being so, were all together and mixed like the particle 1 billion times smaller than a proton that created the universe in the Big BangI fucking love Science, anons.
>>16953334how do “laws” exist when nothing exists? Laws spring into existence chaotically, that’s the only way they could exist, unless you think they caused themselves to exist, which is more absurd. When absolutely nothing exists, anything can happen and there will be no contradiction, as there is nothing to contradict.
>>16953343>When absolutely nothing exists, anything can happen and there will be no contradiction, as there is nothing to contradict.This is tantamount to saying magic exists and that we just happen to live in the configuration where dragons and immortal elves don't wander the world.
>>16953343the laws are a part of the local spacetime. by creating spacetime, you create the laws. other laws can exist, but that is a different spacetime.
the problem with trying to explain creation with god is that you're not actually explaining anything, you're just kicking the can down the road."Where did the universe come from?" just turns into "where did God come from?" The usual response is just "God has always existed or is beyond existance" but then you could just say the same thing about the universe itself so God is a completely unnecessary redundancy
>>16953334Incidentally, both judeo-christcuckoldry and the nig bang queerory are wrong
