Not sure if this is the right board, but let's say that I have a female twin and we have a female child. Then I eventually get our daughter pregnant and we have a daughter and I get our daughter pregnant and so on for multiple generations. Will I eventually create my clone or something really close to it? It's a weird question, but it comes to mind sometimes.
>>16959787if you and your twin are different sexes it means you're not identical twins, you're fraternal twins. It's no different from fucking a regular sister. Also your child wouldn't be "clones" when you do this, it would instead start presenting every recessive gene. Consider the fact that your father is going to have a bunch of recessive genes that your mother doesn't, and your mother will have a bunch that your father doesn't. When you fuck someone genetically close to yourself suddenly you both have the recessive gene to like grow a third arm or have a chin shaped like a coat hanger and your kids are Hapsburgs but poor
>>16959793I see, thank you.
>>16959787Other anon has the right idea but there's in fact a way to check, if you have some homozygous recessive allele (like ginger hair) that your partner didn't have at all, your direct descendants won't have that, but their descendants might (especially if you're introducing your genes again.) So if you see some gingers among the second gen you can guess they probably inherited both halves of your genome, and they're more or less your clones (there's some recombination going on)On the other hand, since you're a guy, you can't breed with them further since they'd be almost certainly XY.
>>16959787wouldn't they be infertile at some point?
