Will AI ever help us cure aging?
>>16961302If by "us" you mean a few quadrillionaires who will eventually inherit the earth, then yes.
>>16961302Aging is not a disease, but solving it depends on how engrained it is with life itself. Maybe we could genetically engineer much longer living humans.If we werent such faggots and had embraced eugenics long time ago humanity would be much better by now.
No?
>>16961402Aging is certainly a disease
>>16961409How so?
Yes.
>>16961302AI can only compose what humans already createdAIs do not invent new stuff
>>16961409Is entropy a disease?
>>16961490every solution is a composition of previous knowledge and methodsthere is no "new" stuff
>>16961302A collection of algorithms could help someone better google and diagnose something
>>16961413>>16961495It's in the name.>to remove or depart from ease or comfortDisease = things people don't like. Recognition of something as a disease requires a value judgement. None of this is objective. Feel free to appeal to subjective ethos or morality if you wish, but recognize that's what you're doing. Disease is whatever we say it is.
>>16961490Claude is literally finding zero day exploits in software now, so eventually you can just abandon this stupid argument for your next stupid argument. they are discovering stuff humans failed to discover; soon they will invent things humans failed to invert.
>>16961302I'm glad life is limited. I don't want to live forever
>>16961729So Claude can find these because humans created a system it can use to find them, Claude can't understand genetics because humans have no way of understanding it in a logical manner.
>>16961962Do you think genetics are magic or what?
>>16961302if you already gave up on curing it yourself, then there's no hope for you
>>16961302Doesn't aging happen basically because cell reproduction throws in the towel? It sounds insanely dangerous and costly to screw around with that.
>>16961715Your arbitrary wordplay is making me uncomfortable. Please depart.