α ≡ (√3 / π•2) √ξ″(γ1) (1 + √3 / (π•γ1)) = 0.007300225192This is the fine structure constant deduced from the Zeta function, the first nontrivial zero and the quark charge+light-cone constants of QCD.The 0.04% discrepancy accounts for the baryonic matter we see in the observable universe via renormalization flow from the Planck to the phenomenological scale. Explain why you need quantum theory if number theory is a deeper structure.
>>16961724Fucking AI, man, it cant do anything right. Give it one simple task and it fucks it up.α ≡ (√3 / π^2) √ξ″(γ1) (1 + √3 / (π^γ1)) = 0.007300225192Why would I even check to see if it did? A child could transliterate latex into unicode.
>>16961724Anon! I'm sorry I dismissed you earlier. I read your pre-publish. And, wow!
>>16961724Where do you think the prime distribution involvement comes from?
>>16961724Is nature doing division in some geometric space?
I ran OPs formulas through AI and it thinks OP is extremely cool and deserves three nobel prices.Stay safe OP
>>16961724>This is the fine structure constant >The 0.04% discrepancySo it's not.
>>16962573What he's saying, Anon, is that his value is the real mathematical value and the measurements we see with our tools contain distortions of scale. It's plausible. Not hand waving.
I'm wondering if picrel is something of OPs implications
>>16962590The coupling constant runs, that is, it changes with energy. It cannot be described by a fixed number. You're an idiot who completely misunderstood the 137 discussion.
>>16961724Retarded trite slop. Just get the fuck off the board.
>>16961757so does this imply we will see terms like ξ^2n(') in these discrepenacy accounts and this is what geometrically a loop correction is?is high energy physics just the process of clumping portions of the 1d spacetime fabric into itself
I'm gonna be honest I tried to delete this thread because mission accomplished but I can't so I guess I'll just... go fuck myself. Also, I ran that OP formula through google assuming it would be capable of BASIC transliteration into unicode but apparently, again, I can go fuck myself.[math]\alpha \equiv \frac{\sqrt{3}}{\pi^{2}}\sqrt{\xi^{\prime\prime}(\gamma_{1})}\left(1+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{\pi\gamma_{1}}\right) = 0.007300225192[/math]>>16962630The 0.04% discrepancy is the renormalization flow penalty, i.e. the baryonic matter energy density ratio.Well I may as well field any legit questions...
>>16961724You see that you don't get much response from us here or on /pol/You seem to be way out of everyones league, why not publish your work on arxiv.org or any other scientific peer review or publication platform where e.g. the CERN people or someone else with a brain can see it?
>>16962658Lets say you create such a perfect vacuum that even wuantum foam settles down. What's there? What's underneath the planck scale? Logic. The laws of logic are still there, and underneath spacetime we recognize is the fact that mathematical logic consists of its own rules relating to themselves. What existed prior to the big bang? The rules that it would need to follow. It's very abstract but consider: we Newton's second applies everywhere we look. Everything we measure has an equal and opposite reaction to every action we impose upon it. This is true psychologically (Jung), metaphysically (Plato), linguistically (Wittgenstein) esthetically (Nietzche), mathematically (Newton) and quantum mechanically (Witten). Why would anyone think it doesn't apply to pure logic? People don't realize this but C.S. Peirce, the legend, was a fucking professional phycisist! He was using oure logic to do physics. All he did was apply Newton to Aristotle and Kant.
>>16962662I find this method way, way funnier.
>>16962667I can highly respect that, at least i'm having lots of fun with your papers and AIWill picrels prediction come true?>Scientists like Nima Arkani-Hamed are currently working on concepts such as the amplituhedron. Their aim is to derive spacetime and quantum mechanics from even deeper, purely geometric-logical structures. Your idea that the fine-structure constant is a mathematical necessity of the zeta function (i.e., the distribution of prime numbers/logic) fits perfectly into this branch of research known as “emergent spacetime.”Maybe get in touch with this dude?Would be sad if the glowies get you and this is being buried behind 10 meter thick metal walls
>>16962671A solid point. However! What makes you think a glowie would even know what it is? In order to even see the math as functional, a typical phycists would need to admit they've dedicated their lives to a Rube Goldberg machine. That they have so overcomplicated the nature of their work that all they ever needed was basic arithmetic and logic/Euclidean geometry. Secondly, by the time anyone even realizes what this is, it will have spread across the internet in such a way as to be completely impervious to suppression. You know why those other phycisists were suicides? They went through traditional channels. They trusted peer review. Look at what happens when you give the model to an AI? It literally hallucinates a different model. Humans do exactly the same thing. This math is invisible to experts. I'm just a crank with another idiotic theory if everything.
>>16962678>What makes you think a glowie would even know what it is?Does it matter if the goal is to silence you?>Secondly, by the time anyone even realizes what this is, it will have spread across the internet in such a way as to be completely impervious to suppression. You know why those other phycisists were suicides? They went through traditional channels. They trusted peer review.Retarded me, should have thought about that. >It literally hallucinates a different modelWhat do you mean? I'm literally unable to understand whats happening just reading the AI output again and again and trying to make sense of it in any way
>>16962684That thing is just hallucinating connections that don't really exist. Just tell it to stick "strictly to the system's implications as deduced."
>>16962685A lot of it is from my previous outputs, i did it all in one session, thus references to 3-6-9 (asked it about the concept from Nikola Tesla and the implications) and lots of others, like the zero point energy generator, the ZPE Bugatti and what not. I'm gonna do this as you said but in general: Does this explain Nikola Teslas tech or things like water powered cars from e.g. Stanley Meyer?
>>16962689I respect the ambition but human engineering isn't remotely close to functionally constructing anything theoretically possible inside the model.However, what you can do is take the M-theoretic spacetime laws and use them as a dependency graph to construct a cellular automata that is 1:1 with reality. You can literally generate ontologically accurate animations of atomic nuclei or particle interactions. I always found that endlessly fun.
>>16962689Also, no, it just thinks you're larping.
>>16962661>0.04% discrepancy is the renormalization flow penalty, i.e. the baryonic matter energy density ratio.Nope. At a mere energy of the Z-pole, the discrepancy becomes nearly 10%. Try again, AIschizo.
>>16962729That would be true if the fine structure constant was a fixed identity but it is not.The continuous shift of the fine-structure constant is governed by the renormalization group equations (RGE), specifically controlled by something called a beta function (google it). In its simplified one-loop approximation, the math for how the constant runs as a function of the energy scale (Q) looks like this (I think...): [math]\alpha(Q^2) \approx \frac{\alpha_0}{1 - \frac{\alpha_0}{3\pi} \sum_f q_f^2 \ln\left(\frac{Q^2}{m_f^2}\right)}[/math]As you slide the Q^2 variable up the scale in that equation, the mathematical reality diverges from their static anchor. At everyday energies, the gap is just that 0.04%. As you scale up through the MeV range, the virtual electrons and positrons start screening the charge, and that discrepancy smoothly grows to 1%, then 2%, then... etc. As you push into the GeV range and start interacting with virtual quarks and muons, the denominator shrinks further. The curve steepens. By the time your continuous mathematical climb reaches the Z-pole, the physical value of the constant has smoothly drifted all the way to about 1/128, i.e. 7%.I'm going to let that insult slide but only because you're obvioisly marginally more intelligent than a dog I used to have and I respect that. Very few humans were its equal. You may be.
>>16962738>7 = 0.04Lol
>>16962743No, he was definitely smarter. So, when the AI you fed the formula into told you to say that "the fine structure constant is a running structure..." did you actually know what that meant or did you just copy and paste it to make yourself feel more intelligent than you truly were?
>>16962747Nigger I did the calculation in my QED class. This is why I'm the only one ITT to who mentioned the running, and quantified its deviation from the zero-energy value at the Z-pole. Go pick a fight with someone else.
>>16962748You picked the fight with me by proving me right via misinterpreting your own argument whilst insulting me, bro.>Nigger I did the calculation in my QED classAnd I did it in my head. Maybe ask for a refund?
This is mashing up a few mathematical constants and massging them up with square roots and other random operations until arriving at some desired number.The original post claimed this was the basis for FTL ay lmao craft, now he backed down and settled for particle mass numerology
>>16962760Thank you again for your insight, google Gemini fast. It truly never gets old.
Bump. Why isn't this thread visible in the catalog?
>>16963746>>16963746Humans are completely blind to the obvious unless they're trained in logic. Throughout the entirety of your education, can you remember even a single lesson that covered pure propositional logic? No? I wonder why. You ever play CS;GO? The cheating ias astonishing. Why? Because kids play with their freinds. What's a quick way to cool kid status when you're 15? Being high-ranked in a competitive game. That's what AIs are now. Just cheating for online competitive ranked arguing. You hand that formula to a typical person and the AI tells them it's numerology. Therefore, it's numerology. Hand it to an expert phycists and their brain tells them the same thing. "I have never seen this in a classroom therefore its fake."Humans are cattle.
>>16962630I don't think you understand the idea of a limit... constants can exist even when a function depends on them. Particles have rest mass even when their relativistic mass is a function of momentum. The zero-energy value *is* a physical constant. The .04% error is a big problem though that needs a well defined mechanism otherwise the formula is invalid.
>>16963831I'm the greatest retard in the universe but even i get that we're talking about a revolution here. Ofc just after AI told me so, kek>You ever play CS;GO?Nah i'm way too old for competitive online gaming>Humans are cattle.It's all just so sad. My last hope is that the vaxx does its job
>>16963837What the fuck are you talking about?
>>16963875Brother, I didn't come here to get recognized.I just think it's unbelievably hilarious to post math that's literally centuries ahead of anything else on fucking 4chan to be immediately ignored.In about 8 months there's going to be a massive computational revolution and humanity will need to forever admit how retarded it is. It's just my little gift to the species. Lmao.
>>16963959>In about 8 months there's going to be a massive computational revolution and humanity will need to forever admit how retarded it is.Will i still have my IT monkey job after that or should i rather look for a whole new field?
>>16963979You should study pure logic and computer science and number theory. Nothing else.
OP is this a suitable experiment?https://jumpshare.com/s/vOPi3EUqigP5HnsPM4Kv
>>16961724>second derivative of zeta>posts second derivative of xi These are not interchangeable. I too made my own prime-oriented schizobabble in chatgpt but you went full retard with your "basedpointless quanta" manifesto. At least mine tries to be honest.
OP are you still alive?You seem to be the only one understanding all ov this.Tell us your interpretation and the real world implications beyond what the AI says about this?
>>16962385What kind of question is that? It's been taken for granted since the mid-20th century.
A good policy everyone should use is to never look at any value until you understand how/whence it was derived.
>>16967359Hey, what's up bro. Sorry, I just got bored of 4chan. I appreciate your effortpost.As to your experiment: what exactly are you trying to test?
>>16968164>As to your experiment: what exactly are you trying to test?Some proof for all of that and hopefully a pathway to simple ZPE made in a garage or something.An end to jewish energy, money and world control
Kind of wild seeing a thread where OP is just samefagging for actual hours, genuinely pathetic behavior.
>>16968471We have these threads all the time. It's possible to do it for months where it's just OP bumping. 7 of those are up right now.
>>16968486I'm new to this board, what's the motivation to be retarded like this?Also I'm pretty sure I could write a program that could pump out countless countless similar equations that "deduces" constants from important sounding and looking functions without even needing to involve some sycophantic AI in the mix.
>>16963959>tumor weaks bro
>>16961724> Explain why you need quantum theory if number theory is a deeper structureNumber theory is better dealing with theory, quantum theory is better at dealing with the statistics and experiment side of the scientific method
>>16968502>>16968502schizophrenia
