How would you solve low fertility rates using science?I start:-remove many women from workplace so they get bored at home and have babies out of boredom-ban goyphones (mobile phones), social media, TV and soap operas, or ban them just for females, so that they are bored at home and want babies out of boredom-limit or ban contraception. Banning might give result of having too many babies. Contraception could also be legal only for couples that already have at least two kids-limit education of women, only send some women (with high potential) to education, most women should be uneducated, at least before they produce two or more babies. Females should first have kids, when they are young, then after this they could study and work (if at all)-ban owning of cats and dogs, females own them instead of kids, they treat them as kids-lower age of marriage and marry young girls, at their puberty or even earlier. The younger the marriage and first pregnancy, the more kids a woman can have-make that at some hours during Saturday or Sunday, the electricity, TV, internet will stop working. This will make people have sex and possibly get pregnant-make that big houses are cheap and make people live in houses in the suburbs or countryside. When people see empty spaces (in the house and outside), they want to fill them with something, for example with children-have people own houses/apartments or rent from the state, because when people rent from private capitalists, they don't have stability, they fear they can be evicted at any time-tax benefits for people with children. Lower property taxes and rent (they need bigger apartments and houses), lower income taxes. Direct payments of money to people with children can be considered but they are not great, they can attract the wrong people to have children, the "bottom" people1/2
2/2-make places and events where peak males (30-40 old) can meet peak females (6-14 old) to find a girlfriend and then a wife. Or alternatively, arrange marriages, by families or by the state-allow dads to have some "fun" with his daughter, at night in the bed and during bathing. This is controversial but it would give motivation to males to have children. However, negative effect of this would be that the future husband of this daughter won't get perfect, pure, virgin product. Another similar idea is to allow dads to sell their daughters to males as wives, this would give monetary motivation to have children and daughters. I am not sure though if monetary motivation is a good motivation to have children-stop women from selecting who their husband is-allow rape in marriage. Controversial but could increase fertility rateThe methods that I listed really work but you will never see capitalist nation implement them, because they only lie that they want high fertility rate, or even if they wanted, short term profits of capitalists are more important than long term interests of a nation.source: https://supercommunism.neocities.org/
>>16963284Simply put aphrodisiacs in the water supply
>>16963284christian’s will just repeal women’s rights and start artificially inseminating women
Israel doesn't have this problem
>>16963302Notorious aphrodisiac abusers
Humanity doesn't need more than a billion people at a time. >lehaha, then you should kill yourselfPopulation growth has slowed and will reverse, especially once we stop supporting the third world. It will get back down to a more reasonable level without needing to resort to killing anyone.
>>16963341But whites and east asians have fertility rate 1.0 while niggers still have about 5.0. Niggers are going to be the biggest race by population.>especially once we stop supporting the third worldAre we really supporting it, or enslaving them and stealing their natural resources?
>>16963302because jews are superior
You'll never solve japans birthrates, stop trying
>>16963398Unironically the solution is to make them work less, allocate resources to encouraging them to start families and to spike their water supplies with aphrodisiacs. Those Nips will fuck like crazy.
>>16963417I forgot you also have to ban contraception
>>16963417>>16963418You incels will never solve japans problem of birthrates
why? what for?
>>16963426It would be solved already if they had common sense like me :PAlso incels are not real, I'm a volcel :P
>>16963284>Contraception could also be legal only for couples that already have at least two kidsIf your goal is to get people to have more kids then this would be the most retarded thing to do. The main driver of lower birth rates is people who have kids having less kids. I don't get why people want higher birth rates though. The global population is far higher than its ever been and increasing. If anything there's far too many people shitting up the planet.
>>16963357>Niggers are going to be the biggest race by population.We won't. The only people who think that are those sad people obsseaed about a hypothetical that rrally has no basis in reality. Mainly because they extremely overexagerate the number of black people constantly. They basically triple any mental estimate (already inflated) by some number that randomly fluctuates up or down bases off whatever deranged rhetoric they want to shill. Ine day we number 2 billion, the other we're sub 2 million and don't exist outside of movies and football.
>>16963285Well that took a dark turn. KYS
>>16963289>>16963314>>16963417aphrodisiacs aren't real, that's like saying "pheromones" >>16963497the source is literally right at the bottom you fucking retard
>>16963284low IQs will forever debate how to fix the logistic curve that population dynamics followEven africa is saturating, slowly. Derivative is highest near inflection point. But none of you would get that because "you don't need highschool math"
>>16963792>aphrodisiacs aren't realretard
>>16963302only because of orthodox jews on welfare
>>16963799>Even africa is saturating, slowly.?3-5 TFR is not saturatingThats literally a growing populationAfrica has 1.5 billionAll of brazil is black, most of south america is part blackThe carribean is blackTheres 50 million blacks in the USATens of millions in europe>we're?
>>16963943>aphrodisiacs are realyou're the retardshow me one aphrodisiac that actually worksdon't say Viagra, all that does is give a boner and you get aroused because your purpose of existing is sticking your dick into things
>>16963284>unironically saids everything buy paying men more money so they can actually deal with all bills with just one incomeHow is anyone taking these conversations seriously? You don't need to treat women like broodmares and the tax relief scam isn't fooling anyone anymore.Seriously give working men $250,000 a year salaries and they will search the earth to find women who will give them five to ten children.
>>16963958>Thats literally a growing populationJust because f' is growing doesn't mean f'' isn't approaching 0 or already negative.Again, I wouldn't have to explain that if people got basic analysis into their rotted brains
>>16964106more correctly, has been growing. If it still is f" would obv still be >0. But I'm wasting my time of course.
>>16963969I mean if we're talking economics, then 20% of the population pays 80% of the taxes.. So economically speaking, it would be much smarter to only taxate these 20% and trim the fat of the government overhead. The only reason this would not be the objectively correct thing to do is because it hurts the feelings of people who would benefit from it
>>16963284promote:>job stability>affordable housing>economically incentivize births>good paid and secure (as in no way losing ur job) maternity and paternity leaves>solid and healthy societynot rocket science you faglords
>>16963965Reminder that Sigmund Freud literally thought everything is penis and momcest because of cocaine.
>>16963284You can fix birth rates by destroying the industrial system itself, not by eliminating its symptoms. Feminism, environmental pollution, rising obesity, inceldom, the increase in psychiatric disorders, a youth taking refuge in drugs as a source of hope, and all similar issues stem from the industrial system.
>>16963284You have dysmorphism if you think people are a group, not individuals. It will split your vision, cross-eyed; I can esp see you.
