Quantum Entanglement is fucked up if you really think about it. It means that distance is just a meme. There are interactions that can happen without data needing to travel from one point to another.It is very similar a computer program, where you code some objects so they need to travel across a screen and collide to interact, and other objects that are specifically coded to interact with no regard to location at all.Essentially entanglement is the proven phenomenon where entangled object 1 has some property A and entangled object 2 has some property A. When the objects are entangled, property A is clouded and uncertain until they are interacted with. But determining the property A of object 1 will instantly cause object 2 to reveal its property A simultaneously without the need to interact with it first.According to the No Communication Theorem, the value of property A must be truly random, as in, fully unpredictable, as this maintains the natural law thaf information cannot travel locally faster than C in a void.So entanglement teaches us several dark truths about our world. 1. Not all interactions have to make contact.2. True randomness exists.3. A object does not have a value until it is forced into a scenario wherein it must have one and only one value and this somehow randomly assigns a value to that object.This last one almost implies that our interactions with other things are what force our attributes to manifest and without physical interactions that ground us in reality we are a cosmic soup floating around randomly.Spooky lol.
the wavefunction collapse is a result of us being simulatedno need to render fine details unless a player is observing it
>>16963553"simulated" What if said simulation is merely the entablement of multidimensional fractals that interact 5th dimensionally via time-space ordinance in the brain that attract cross dimensional mathematical recursions to cling to one another through infinite space time to coincide. Thus, the omniverse 5th dimension functions like a hologram emitter, and it emits more data and energy to what the conscious experience interacts with. Thus, a greater intelligence can imagine and do more.
>>16963551havent you heard, entanglement is fake and gay according to the masterminds of /sci/. it's too bad they wont share with us their research or enlightened view of the universe that they surely have achieved.
>>16963551>Infinite means that every possible 3rd dimension that can happen, will happen. >The distance across space and time are an illusion of the 3rd dimension. >Therefore everything that can and will happen is happening everywhere, always, and all at once. >Thus your conscious experience is merely a chosen perspective within the Omniverse matrix.1. All interactions will make contact eventually, given long enough time and enough recursions of the 3rd dimension. 2. An object has a predestined path through existence, and no free will to change that, which is what an object is by definition: Locked into causal fate. 3. Value is relative to perception within the construct of conscious beings.
>>16963568Imagine if we all just spent a few months together collaborating sincerely. Imagine what we could all accomplish together...
>>16963551It would be even weirder if it wasn't true.Imagine you have a left and right shoe and randomly assign them to different boxes, and I mean "true random." The contents of each box is unknowable until you open one. But once you do, you know the contents of the other no matter how far apart they are.If these "entangled" shoes could both belong to the same foot just because the boxes were opened a lightyear apart, that would imply something much more "spooky" than this supposed "action at a distance." It would imply that what "reality" you exist in is frame dependent and the outcomes of two different "realities" could later be observed within the same frame.What's happening with quantum entanglement experiments is basically the same as with the shoe analogy. Except instead of a left and right shoe, they're opposing spins of particles. But the core principle remains the same.While Copenhagen may require "action at a distance," interpretations like Many Worlds or Pilot Wave treat the inverse relationship as a global variable invariant to space and time. It's the universe staying self-consistent.
>>16963573real entanglement is way more complicated than that. your shoe analogy is shit, because the shoes already have a defined and predetermined right or left shape before they're separated, but the quantum particles do not. It also doesn't take account the wave function collapse which is a big part of the spookiness, as one collapse light years apart will cause an instant collapse for particle B as well.
>>16963571you wouldn't accomplish anything whatsoeveryou should "collaborate" for a few months on learning basic calculus and QM before spouting off
Just thinking aloud: if something's unique in the universe, then it could be seen and change like entangled particles.
>>16963573>What's happening with quantum entanglement experiments is basically the same as with the shoe analogy.You're proposing a local hidden variable theory. Those have been disproved ages ago
>>16963603>>16963705You are extending the analogy further than intended. I am not proposing local hidden variables. Which shoe is in which box isn't decided until you open one up.That's why I emphasized *global* variables and have a nod to interpretations where "wave function collapse* isn't even really a thing.
quantum stuff filters me hard but at least I know I got filtered.
