what are the implications? I'm a 120iq midwit
>>16963975Speed of Dark is real.Darkness>Light by 4%Light may not be intrinsically tied to causality.Incoming technologies and formulas that revolve around circumventing light's dominance in retrieval of information.
>>16963975speed of light limit is just an assumption. It's never been tested
>>16963975VERY anti semitic experiment>>16964000technically its an axiom einstein made
>>16963975I only watched one of that guy's videos but it was annoying. I hate his clickbaity thumbnails and retarded facial expressions.
>creates substractive interference>creates substractive interference again>Guys! FTL!Why are they like this?
>>16963975Without watching the video, I guess they mixed up phase velocity and group velocity AGAIN
>>16963975If this is the same thing I read a thing about the other day then the inevitable "no we didn't actually invent FTL" factor is that the "things" moving faster than light here contain no useful information.Also off-topic but I think there was a comment on that article to the effect of "moving a laser pointer across the moon is faster than light but also contains no useful information so not really" which I know I've read more than once before and rank up there with "space is cold so stuff freezes" in the pantheon of midwit physics.
The way I think of light is a bit like this GIF, magnetic and electric fields interacting with each other perpetually and self-propagating. So light being the so called speed of causality doesn't actually make that much sense because there are a lot of interactions happening. Meaning you have a lot of leeway to go faster but only if it's possible to cut down on the interactions happening per area.
I could see photons in wave packets move after free light from it had enveloped a pathway.
>>16964193>Meaning you have a lot of leeway to go faster but only if it's possible to cut down on the interactions happening per area.Prove it
>>16964000>speed of light limit is just an assumptionYes>>16964000>It's never been testedIts been tested a lot.>>16964149yes, same as these wave packet exits cavity before it enters type of papers
>>16963975There are none. We already knew that non-physical things like shadows, laser pointer dots or intersection points can move faster than light, because they don't carry information (and don't physically exist, for that matter).
>>16963975am I getting this right: it's literally just confirmation that phase velocities can move FTL which we already fucking knew since forever? or is this something else?
