not that you can't or that you won't, plank is not a measure of distance but of resolution of space, that is if you force a particle into planck length the universe will pop out another one
if you think planck as a length of measurable distance then you don't get the entire qm framework, sorry

>>16964872
no such thing as planck

>channer gets confused by 2,500 old joke
many such cases

still, no such think as planck

the universe is contineous but it cannot manifest that physically because it will cause information overload at a certain level it needs the univese to behave discretely while hiding all the continous information in c-y manifolds

yw

>>16964900
>meaningless jewish schizobabble

>>16964922
if universe was continous you'd be able to zoom in endlessly leading to paradox like infinite energy catastrophy, trust me, by falling on racist diatribe it just mean you have no inkling of qm

>>16964934
I'm sorry chatgpt, but my post wasn't a "prompt" for you to spew more meaningless jewish schizobabble

>doesn't believe in Planck
Ok, explain the black body spectrum then. I'd like to see your derivation from the Rayleigh–Jeans law.

>>16964866
reminder that time and space are discrete and no amount of glowie shilling can prove otherwise

>>16964866
I simply cast my domain amplification to bridge the gap and arrive at my destination.

>>16964964
>its true 'cause some made up theory offers a convenient stop-gap
scientists really are retards

>>16965197
I'm trans btw in case anyone cares.