lol I remember this guy. you guys were shilling so hard for him that I should have known he was a fraud.
I knew he was the bad guy all along, just look at that face.
>>16966702imo true /sci/entists should look like that, looking for power for vengeance in /sci/ence, absolute /sci/ villain
Just assume any magical cancer cure hyped up by boomers/brainlets is garbage. Works everytime.
>>16966687financial interest doesnt mean the study is fake
>>16966793yes it does?
>>16966702James Bond villain looking ass disfigurement
>>16966840no it doesnt. Its normal for universities to try to profit from their non-fake useful research, when iy happens. Why should it be donated to some pharma company?
>>16967072>Why should it be donated to some pharma company?Because they have money to give the government and university administrations, so those bureaucracies demand what those companies want.
>>16966687As long as his results are independently reproducable, it's simply a minor setback. If it isn't though, then good for them for catching it.
"Do you expect me to believe?""No Mr Bond, I expect you to INVEST"
>>16966793No, but deliberately obfuscating that information calls its objectivity into question.If I publish a study saying a new pharmaceutical is guaranteed to give you a bigger penis, and I deliberately hide the fact that I own a controlling interest in the new medication, Bonergrowaphyl, it should raise some red flags.
>>16967096They profit more from licensing the patents. Many tech companies get their start in universities
