[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 4_ellipses.jpg (72 KB, 875x798)
72 KB JPG
Hi everyone, I came across this interesting problem and I'm looking for a proof:

Consider a convex quadrilateral. The four vertices of the quadrilateral serve as the foci for four ellipses.

The condition is: The two ellipses of opposite sides of the quadrilateral touch each other at exactly one point P. This condition holds for both pairs of opposite ellipses simultaneously (sharing the same point P).

The goal: Prove that the two tangents of the two pairs of ellipses at point are perpendicular to each other for any convex quadrilateral.

I haven't quite cracked it yet. Any insights?
>>
bump
>>
The geometric proof based on the image centers on the reflection property of ellipses.

1. Property of the First Tangency
The quadrilateral vertices are A, B, C, and D. The first pair of opposite ellipses have foci (A, B) and (C, D). Because they are tangent at point P, they share a common normal line, n1. By the optical property of ellipses, the normal at any point bisects the angle formed by the lines to the foci. Therefore, n1 bisects both angle APB and angle CPD.

2. Angle Definitions at P
Let P be the origin and n1 align with the x-axis (0 and pi radians). Based on the bisection property:
[eqn] \text{Angle of } PB = \alpha [/eqn]
[eqn] \text{Angle of } PA = -\alpha [/eqn]
[eqn] \text{Angle of } PC = \pi - \beta [/eqn]
[eqn] \text{Angle of } PD = \pi + \beta [/eqn]

3. Property of the Second Tangency
The second pair of ellipses has foci (B, C) and (D, A). They share a common normal, n2, which must bisect angle BPC and angle DPA simultaneously.
[eqn] \text{Bisector of } \angle BPC = \frac{\alpha + (\pi - \beta)}{2} = \frac{\pi}{2} + \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} [/eqn]
[eqn] \text{Bisector of } \angle DPA = \frac{(\pi + \beta) + (2\pi - \alpha)}{2} = \frac{3\pi}{2} + \frac{\beta - \alpha}{2} [/eqn]

4. Conclusion
For n2 to be a straight line, the difference between these bisectors must be pi:
[eqn] \left( \frac{3\pi}{2} + \frac{\beta - \alpha}{2} \right) - \left( \frac{\pi}{2} + \frac{\alpha - \beta}{2} \right) = \pi + \beta - \alpha [/eqn]

Setting this equal to pi requires [math] \beta = \alpha [/math]. Substituting this back into the n2 angle formula results in an angle of pi/2. Thus, n1 (0 radians) and n2 (pi/2 radians) are perpendicular. Since the tangent lines are perpendicular to their respective normals, the tangents t1 and t2 are also perpendicular.
>>
Exactly! Wonderful! The law of reflection, as a property of an ellipse, or rather the fact that the tangent is the bisector of the focal angle, leads to the solution here. Thank you very much for this suggested solution!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.