I think it's not ethical to do scientific experiments on animals. What's the alternative? Simulations?
the alternative is nothing
>>16968636Nothing is ethical. Every good that exists has come from a cost in suffering. Life is no exception.
>>16968636the alternative is letting children die
>>16968636Paid experiments on willing human subjects. I'd sign up for it. Shoot me up with the experimental crap as long as the payment is high enough.
>>16968636They can make a body without the subject. It's just a machine. Fairly easy to do with just DNA multiplication.
Just experiment on humans and leave animals alone
>>16968651Experiment on the children, especially if they spawned from India or Subsaharan Africa
>>16968637>>16968651This. Simulations are educated guesses, and if you're never doing the thing for real you've got no data to build the simulation with.>>16968684>>16968777>>16968806>I don't feel like I belong to society so I want my fellow man punished for abandoning me
>>16968636Ideally, scientists should experiment on themselves if they really want to know. Realistically, even if you don't do the experiments someone else will.
>>16968636The non-whites.
>>16968636Increase rate of death penalty for violent criminals. Do experiments on these people. It's the best option.
>>16968684That does not contain all aspects of a living body that can interfere with the resultsOP should be a test subject then
>>16968636indians and africans
>>16968636Then you don't know the meaning of ethics.
