>apollo astronauts saw repetitive, bright flashing lights that lit up the interior of the CSM and stuff zipping around the moon while in orbit of it are alien spaceships real? or is it space critters like space octopuses or something
>AAAIIIIEEEEEEEEEE SAVE ME HOUSTONVery funny to see people losing their minds over some "flashing lights"
>>16972648theres no lightning or St. Elmo’s fire in space and even then im pretty sure the highly trained astronauts would be able to recognize if it was something mundane
>>16972644I'm on the fence if the moon mission actually happened.When I think about it, I think it was pretty impossible for them to do it because nobody can do it anymore.
>>16972651They were not "in space", dum-dum.>im pretty sure the highly trained astronauts would be able to recognize if it was something mundaneWhy? How often did they hang out on the moon?
>>16972653you sound stupid
I woke up today with visions of Trump (he's linked to my higher mind) and a larger, physically built-up alien female with an understanding of societies giving advice. She said I was boring after a while (people ended me here with money trade)
>>16972654I'm so dumb and uninformed, please list all the atmospheric and optical phenomena one might encounter on or in orbit of the Moon.
>>16972663you dont understand grabbidy and thats ok
>>16972644Wouldn't we expect the moon to have various rocks and shit orbiting it here and there? And with no atmosphere stuff could orbit at much lower altitudes than on earth.Given the environment and that bright flashing lights are electromagnetic phenomena and they're moving through magnetic fields, probably some kind of arcing on the outside of the ship.
>>16972677whats this then
>>16972686I can confidently assert that those are definitely pixels.More seriously, light reflecting off dust.
>>16972698Why would it have depth like that and be in the shape of a triangle?I am open to a conventional explanation but “it’s just dust” doesnt sit right to me, i mean do you have any examples of dust looking like that? You must admit that it is compelling
>>16972746>Why would it have depth like thatWhat the fuck does that mean? What "depth" are you even seeing in that blurry pixelated zoomed in spot? Do you think floating dust would have no depth or structure? Ever seen a fucking cloud?>or be in the shape of a triangle?You HAVE seen the other photos in this series, right? Why would you ask something so inane?>>16972396Your retardation is more fascinating than whatever phenomenon this is.
>>16972800are you able to provide mundane photographic evidence that proves your point? Because literally the only time i ever see these kinds of shapes (triangles) or gear descriptions of strange flashes in fucking space is in discussion of unexplained phenomena, surely you have many examples of images and video of the ISS being filled with light from something going on outside of the spacecraft, right?Your explanations work in a vacuum, but there’s an entire, enormous, corpus of recordings and eyewitness testimony that illustrate this shit as anything other than normalAgain im not even necessarily arguing FOR “aliums”, im just arguing against this explanation you’ve chosen to give. Its lazy and falls apart under scrutiny
>>16972803>the only time i ever see these kinds of shapes (triangles)You mean three points in close proximity to one other?Again, is your schizophrenia so strong your brain flushed out memories of the other photos in that sequence?
>>16972804Im asking you to provide provable, photographic evidence of dust particles aligning in a triangle in the background of literally any mundane image that has been taken throughout human history, are you unable to provide that?A picture inside a house with dust particles aligned like that for example, anything
>>16972805Feel free to zoom in on this image 500% and look for triangles to your heart's content, I've cropped out a few to get you started.
>>16972808The burden of proof is on you, not me I provided my evidence, and you debate against it, yet have no photographs to back it up. If this was a common artifact of photographs, itd be easy to find. So find it
>>16972813I already did, though? You don't like my triangles? Why?
>>16972815That's what you get for trying to steal sugar from your grandmas cupboard
>>16972746>Alliyums also adhere to FAA regulations for navigation lights
