Doesn't it violate entropy?
No, why the flipping fuck would it?
>>16972969fpbp, answer it op
>>16973028>>16973071oscillating reactions violate entropy retards. if one step of the process increases entropy, the other has to reduce it to be able to come back to the previous state
>>16973495no they dont you stupid fucking faggotfuck you
>>16973495Only if you arbitrarily set the system boundaries in the chemical domain and neglect heat and mass transfer.
>>16973495>the other has to reduce it to be able to come back to the previous stateThis system never comes back to a previous state, thoughbait.
>>16973516>>16973540you clearly don't know what you're talking about. do research before posting retard>>16973528I set the boundary conditions of the universe. BZ is impossible, sooner or later the entropy always wins
>>16973585oscillating reactions do not "violate entropy" (by which I assume you mean "violate the second law of thermodynamics"), retard
>>16973585You clearly have a delusional mental illness.
>>16973586>>16973588BZ reactions aren't possible in a closed system, and the universe is a closed system retards. Why is this so hard too understand?
>>16973590>>16973590You're a bio-LLM with no sentience, spouting token continuations based on words like "oscillating", "cycles" etc. You lack qualia so you can't witness the reaction and see that it never actually comes back to a previous state. :^)
>>16973595>qualiakys. I wish 4chan had an autoban bot for everyone who uses that word. this is the science boardwhat do you mean exactly with the reaction necer comes back to the previous state? the fact that it does is the whole definition of oscillating reaction
>>16973600>gets defensive about qualiaUh oh. Looks like I nailed it.
>>16973600>the fact that it does is the whole definition of oscillating reactionAbsolutely, 100% nailed it:>>16973595> bio-LLM with no sentience, spouting token continuations based on words like "oscillating", "cycles" etc.Imagine having your entire "cognition" limited to vague verbal associations, holy kek.
>>16973590Is the entire universe oscillating? No? Then shut the fuck up, retard
>>16973609do you really think a BZ reaction can keep happening even after the heat death of the universe?
>>16973540>This system never comes back to a previous stateCame here to say this. This is the basis of chaos theory.>>16973609>Is the entire universe oscillating?Perhaps. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovJcsL7vyrk
>>16973617"heat death of the universe" is schizo shit made up by mossad i.e. its not real.
>>16973617Dunno, I've put it on my backlog of questions to worry about 40 trillion years in the future
>>16973600P-zombie alert.
>>16972969Umm, doesn't this violate entropy, too?
>>16974122That's not even a good example. Biology actively fights entropy every moment of life. This chemical reaction just passively decays, so if anything, it's more like a mass on a spring.
>>16974122the heart works with an oscillating reaction retard.we're talking about the same thing. look up FitzHugh–Nagumo
