>mfw manufacturing engineer had the gall to suggest that design engineering manage part inventory for manufacturing...How did we get here? America, America, your nation is bleeding ... An entire generation has been systematically robbed of generational knowledge transfer, and we will see the compounding effects for decades to come.
>>16974585No one wants to think of the long term consequences. Same with the shitshow that is non-compete clauses fucking over the labour supply in so many industries.
>>16974585>mfw manufacturing engineer had the gall to suggest that design engineering manage part inventory for manufacturing...what does thay mean in simple terms? curious
>>16974585>oh no my specilized degree is specialized There are only, electrical, naval, aerospace, mechanical, civil, and chemical engineers. Everhthing that came before or after is in servitude of a capitalist system centered around non-humans for its optimization.Population under 2 billionUniversities public onlyEngineers are academics firstSuck my dick
>>16974595There is not enough functional incentive to consider the long term, and investors cannot be trusted to be ethical in their business development. You would need to change the rules of the game to incentivize lasting business strategies. >>16974756design engineering is a blanket term- typically design falls within your "real engineer" categories.I have met a few manufacturing engineers worth their salt, but I agree, the day-to-day job is not as scientific as other engineering roles.
Graphene will cost as much as cardboard soonVery few people understand the implications of that
>>16974756>Population under 2 billion>Universities public only>Engineers are academics firstLmao read some more before you output tbe schizo lines.
>>16975295Retard vs>>16975213German gene engineer.I wrote something absurd and obnoxious and he replied to the part that he thought was important. What a scholar.Anyway, my point was that due to the socioeconomic course of western socities, engineering has become a commodity for unicersities to make money out of. As such critical thinking, and in depth understanding have taken a backseat to "marker ready" and "industry requirements". This essentially creates indoctrinated "professionals" suited to a role, instead of humans reaching for knowledge and improvement.The population needs to be greatly reduced to eradicate the ability of economies of scale, and bring back "human" development.Thank you for reading my blogpost
>>16975323You other statement is also bullshit. Fields and professions ahve morphed and shifted since the dawn of time. The idea that there'a only 6 is pretty daft to say.
>>16975338Sure they have but, there have been few to no real changes in the fundamentals, while there is a new "engineering" degree sprouting every year. Specializing is of course necessary, and as human technology gets more complex it is imperative to do so. However, as I mentioned, there have been few to no advancements in thermodynamics, for example. If you want to be a nuclear engineer, you HAVE to know thermodynamics like its your wife's asscrack. Anything moving away from this in terms of education is either for profiteering, or serves to isolate and "specialize" working men so as they are deficient in seeing and comprehending macroscale trends. Machines dont want more machines, they want cheaper cogs.It is also the reason why russians and iraniana (as well as other third-non-third world countries) still pump out more truly innovative designs and people (truly pertaining to actual real world applications and not series a and b funding of gambling startups).Advanced science being commoditized has been extremely detrimental to every nation and humanity as a whole.
>>16975213All corporations are owned in VAST OVERWHELMING MAJORITY by international privateers that only want to steal and control.End corporate law as we know it and only allow incorporation if every employee owns part of the business and make the CEO criminally liable for the actions of the company.Obviously won't happen.But this is the ONLY problem.Saying a CORPORATION is a "US company" or a "chinese company" is meaningless and only there to confuse people.
>>16974585Why not?
>>16974585White wahmen decided to be whores and the cuck men let them. You want advanced tech? You are going to need large numbers of 20-40yr old Whites or East Asians.Whoops, Moshe Goldberger says everyone is the same! My mistake.
>>16975650Ask AI unironically lolol. Project management theory isn't that hard. The practice is harder>>16975651DEI + Corporatism have gutted this nation. Only radical but appropriate reforms can change our trajectory towards ruin (i.e. none of the typical garbage posted by reddit and 4chan.) Neither party has the answer because they're not working for the common man, possibly not even America, and it's become blatantly apparent in the last decade.>>16975323Your theory ignores the rapid development of AI. Reducing the population will not create a perceived "need" for human development from the upper classes. They will just try to backfill with AI and if it fails, they still win because they control more resources.Instead, fix labor laws, add accountability for corporate leaders, and give incentives for innovation in industry.
>>16975698What DEI? Companies have basically ignored it or gone on firing campaigns for ages at this point. Hell at this point even any white person who lacks major networking or isn't solidly middle class (as in family was middle class for 2-3 gens) get fucked because of how clique many workplaces are.
>>16975407>by international privateers
