why there has not been a nation of high iq autists conquering the earth with their advanced tech?i think scandinavians and japs were close but they lost it, do you think such society could emerge in the future?
>>16975095This is more of a social science question, but this feels like a version of the spartan myth in which every citizen is a well trained X. But the spartans were not like the myth, the society you envision is likely not possible.
>>16975095>could
>>16975095I mean, that's basically what the entire colonial period was. Problem is, there was more than one highly advanced society competing to take their slice of the world. Any time a single civilization advances, their trading partners will see and emulate that tech.
One of the biggest problems with trying to “perfect” a society’s genes/bloodline with breeding is that women always manage to pass down shit genes where men fail. Female autists scarcely have a reduced birth rate compared to normal women, while male autists are reduced exponentially. Short women have no issue reproducing while short men struggle. Physically weak women have some guy swoop in to save her while a weak man simply dies. All these dysgenic traits and more still exist mostly or solely due to how easy it is for women to reproduce.The only real solution for this is to wait for in-vitro gene editing to mature as a technology and use that, while the rest of the world is still being luddites and panicking about it being immoral
>>16975095
>>16975095>The USA made the first nuclear bomb and tried to hide the technology to be the only one to have it and be the only superpower.>Just four years later the Soviet Union detonated it's first nuclear bomb.You only have an advantage at first but other powerful nations will eventually copy your technology and challenge you.
