[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: maxresdefault (9).jpg (122 KB, 1280x720)
122 KB JPG
This is fucking retarded design a lunar lander must have two stages single stage landers are too inefficient.
>>
>>16977320
Hahaha what a piece shit
80 years gone by and trillio s of dollars wasted and all we get is an Apollo clone with a useless stylized fairing
>>
>>16977320
actually 2 stages is inefficient because you're throwing away hardware worth millions
>>
It's not inefficient if it is able to mine the moon for propellant. Two stages is inherently more risky.
>>
They put a condom over it.
>>
File: 1763085960764204.jpg (1.83 MB, 1000x2000)
1.83 MB JPG
>>16977320
A half-century of technological progress changes things, grandpa.

>>16977360
>80 years gone by
They flew to the moon in the 1940s, retard?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.