point at all to reading about science if you cannot understand more than high school math?Is there even a single well known person in all of history who was mathematically retarded, for his time, which made significant contributions to science?
>>16979336>AI still can't do handsgrim
>>16979336No. Learn math, retard.
>>16979336Popular Science used to be aimed at people like you that have an interest in science and engineering but aren't domain experts. In the 80s there was a range of science magazines for people of differing levels of knowledge.
Faraday
>>16979336no, its all faith initiative at that point. at certain point you're supposed to trust others and the institution of science for their veracity of claims due to past reputation for advancing sciencehowever, in modern science, this not the case. physics hasnt advanced over the last 50 years. biology cannot tell the difference between a man and a woman, psychology research papers are coin toss with no verifiability, humanities are pseudo junk
