how does this drug for animals kill of viruses exactly?i took it durying covid and it made me feel better almost immediatly
>>17017552It's not a drug for animals. You can read one of the dozens of papers on it if you are interested in it's mechanics.
Im scared to take it, Ill let my immune system work
>>17017552i took it during omicron and it cleared my covid infection in a few hours. i couldnt believe how well it worked either.>>17017635the human version is safe and effective
It's been 6 years you boring chud
>>17018024We still see a fair bit of infections around here, the press just doesn't want to write about it for some reason.
>>17017552wouldn't you rather just get the fauci-ouchie? it doesn't come with all the embarrassing social stigma.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ipsrj1jJ1eM&ra=m
>>17017552>how does this drug for animalsIvermectin has been prescribed to humans around 3 billion times (that's billion with a b, not million). It's one of the safest medications in existence, significantly safer than aspirin. As human beings are animals, your statement is technically correct, but deliberately misleading to anyone with an above-room temperature IQ. It's a drug for humans.>kill of [sic] virusesThe hypothesis is it acts by inhibiting certain viruses from binding to certain receptors in the body. No binding to receptor, virus is unable to infect+reproduce. As many biological systems are intricately interconnected, many medications have been found to have multiple effects separate from their initial intended use, it's not at all uncommon. In this case, there is a significant amount of evidence supporting this medication's efficacy for the implied context.
>>17017826>the human versionWhat a stupid thing to write lolThe chemistry doesn't suddenly change because it's contained in a packaging saying "horses only", you knowJust have to dose properly, all there is to it
>>17017826>safe and effectivewhy does this sound so sinister?
>>17020662dumb fucking paste eatertablets exist you moron
>>17017552>covid vax: >:(>sheep dewormer: :0
>>17020728I don't understand your post. Can you rephrase it in terms of medical efficacy?
>>17020662>The chemistry doesn't suddenly change because it's contained in a packaging saying "horses only", you knowHorses and animals in general aren't going to be affected by potential bacterial or other microbial contamination. We usually separate human grade and animal grade products based on the cleanliness in manufacturing and sourcing of raw materials so you don't get explosive diarrhea.
>>17017552There are meta-analyses saying it don't work, so probably placebo and coincidence. BromAC has great in vitro data at least last I checked, so I just do that shit instead and haven't been sick since the delta variant.
