[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20260713_154102.jpg (145 KB, 1079x1343)
145 KB JPG
>with no internal structure
Who came up with this bullshit? It explains nothing. What is charge? Assumptions and models and all are ugly and complex and arbitrary.
>>
charge is to electric fields as mass is to gravity. yet you don't sperg out over gravity because you see it. how else do you explain static electricity if not for charges, dumbass?
>>
>>17018725
trust god libtard
>>
>>17018733
I did not ask "what are the effects of charge".

What is charge? Physicists don't even try to answer this. They would if they wouldn't model electrons as point particles.
>>
>>17018746
like i said. it's as if you were asking what is mass, but you wouldn't ever be so retarded as to seriously ask it.
>>
>>17018750
The electron model does not explain where charge, mass and spin come from and why it has these attributes.
>>17018750
>like i said.
You did not
>>
>>17018725
It's not that electrons are inherently point particles, rather they are so small that in the mathematical model it is virtually inconsequential whether you model it as a point particle or not.
>>
>>17018758
i'm sorry that you lack the intelligence and the requisite physics knowledge to understand my first post itt. i won't waste my time trying to educate a retard.
>>
>>17018750

>what is mass
a standing wave of energy in real time and real distance oscillating in complex phase ontology.

easy question
>>
>>17018725
>What is charge?
A surface phenomenon in a turbulent fluid driven by the Lamb vector (Electric field)
>>
>>17018725
>What is charge?
A succulent Chinese meal.
>>
>>17018725
>What is charge?
look up noether's theorem. internal structure is not necessary to explain charge, you just need symmetry
>>
mass is charge btw
>>
>>17018725
Kek at your pic
>>17018824
Noether's theorem is what would be called cranck science today, it has no real physical proof. No observation. Its just an explanation. But its was made by this famous jewess and helped einstein so here we go.
>>
>>17018725
It's been proven without a doubt that they don't have internal structure but later on it might be proven that they do. That's how science works, chud
>>
>>17018725
Seems physics is abstract garbage that is only true if you believe physicists autistic screechings are true
>>
>>17018907
>>>/pol/



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.