>with no internal structureWho came up with this bullshit? It explains nothing. What is charge? Assumptions and models and all are ugly and complex and arbitrary.
charge is to electric fields as mass is to gravity. yet you don't sperg out over gravity because you see it. how else do you explain static electricity if not for charges, dumbass?
>>17018725trust god libtard
>>17018733I did not ask "what are the effects of charge".What is charge? Physicists don't even try to answer this. They would if they wouldn't model electrons as point particles.
>>17018746like i said. it's as if you were asking what is mass, but you wouldn't ever be so retarded as to seriously ask it.
>>17018750The electron model does not explain where charge, mass and spin come from and why it has these attributes.>>17018750>like i said.You did not
>>17018725It's not that electrons are inherently point particles, rather they are so small that in the mathematical model it is virtually inconsequential whether you model it as a point particle or not.
>>17018758i'm sorry that you lack the intelligence and the requisite physics knowledge to understand my first post itt. i won't waste my time trying to educate a retard.
>>17018750>what is massa standing wave of energy in real time and real distance oscillating in complex phase ontology.easy question
>>17018725>What is charge?A surface phenomenon in a turbulent fluid driven by the Lamb vector (Electric field)
>>17018725>What is charge?A succulent Chinese meal.
>>17018725>What is charge?look up noether's theorem. internal structure is not necessary to explain charge, you just need symmetry
mass is charge btw
>>17018725Kek at your pic>>17018824Noether's theorem is what would be called cranck science today, it has no real physical proof. No observation. Its just an explanation. But its was made by this famous jewess and helped einstein so here we go.
>>17018725It's been proven without a doubt that they don't have internal structure but later on it might be proven that they do. That's how science works, chud
>>17018725Seems physics is abstract garbage that is only true if you believe physicists autistic screechings are true
>>17018907>>>/pol/