Lemme answer for you in advance: No. No, you couldn’t.
>>17032199do codemonkeyjeets really?
>>17032199How come AI still cannot get right the most basic of basics, knowledge and interpretation? The rules for that are not hard...I mean, what's the fucking point of a knowledge machine, if all it does is give the average opinion?
I did just fine for 35 years without it.
>>17032216you're probably just too dumb to even use it properly
all ChatGPT does is find a Reddit post that agrees with you.>>17032219>i'm intelligent enough to use a tool which finds a Reddit opinion that agrees with meUhh... Weird flex but ok.
>>17032199I've never used it at all except when google.com tries to rape my eyes with a nonconsensual AI blurb at the top of the search results page that I ignore and immediately scroll out of sight; so yeah, don't care one way or the other whether it's available or not.
It's like saying to a miner, if all the machinery is gone, would you be able to mine with a pickaxe? Yeah... probably he could, but he wouldn't want to.
>>17032199If your answer is "no" then you deserve to be replaced by a jeet
>>17032242That analogy doesn't even work because any the increased productivity from LLMs is nowhere near the contribution of industrial machinery.
>>17032199I work in a lab and 80% of my tasks involve interaction with material objects. When I ask LLMs how to do things I do they produce word salad barely connected with reality.The only useful application of AI for me is faster search for scientific articles and even with that it often hallucinates so I'm not sure how much time it really saves. Overall, AI is not a big deal for my work. Would like to see genAI totally abolished as it means no more AI slop.
>>17032217Everybody always did fine not using the next new thing. The difference this time is AI takes everybodies cake.
>>17032199>needs a CPU to functionAn actual, literal NPC. Literally something you could just put in a video game, just with some useless flesh attached.
>>17032373What is your brain, genuis?
>>17032199I never used ai to work
>>17032415No you don't get no work.
>>17032416I have a job, jeet
>>17032216Just as Wikipedia, or Google, or the Internet, AI does not produce true-false answers. Only some demented boomers and silent generation fossils ask "is this Wikipedia page true?", "is this Google result true?", "is the Internet true?", "is this AI summary true?".
>>17032419And you dont produce no shit
The only thing I use AI for is asking the names of things I can only vaguely remember and can't describe in easily searchable keywords.I think I can manage not being able to instantly look up that the thing from kung fu stories where one guy would set a platform in the middle of town and take on challengers was called a Lei Tai.
>>17032413Not a literal computer chip I rent from Californian druggies
Obselecance Sucks. Stop Crying. Evolve and Adapt. Or Not.. That's what humans doodoo
Saar pls consult the equation: e = mc2 + AI
>>17032217our ancestors did fine without toilets, water pumps, diesel engines, tri-phase electric motors, electric lamps, antibiotics, haber-bosch process fertilizers, semiconductors, the internet, information transfer protocols, but I don't want to give up any of that
>>17032328so it's less of a threat to your job? what's with all the drama, then?>hurr oracle laid off peoplewho the fuck cares if absurdly over-staffed california companies laid off people and blamed it on AI?
>>17032421true.
>>17032199
>>17032559Doesn’t follow. AI should be taken to its natural limit so that everyone who depends on it for job security or emotional fulfillment can be fully goyified and corralled into submission, peacefully; it’s the only nonviolent way to immunize the planet against jeets and other strains of incontinent nignoggery.
>>17032584This is what >>17032559 said, minus the violent language.>Amazing an AI cultist makes the perfect argument why all AI must be destroyed and all AI cultists [redacted].
>>17032589>>17032584>Doesn’t followLets summarizeLuddites (name worn with pride now)>AI is a existential threat to humanity it will erode any skills.AI cultists>No you are stupidAI Cultists later>HELP HELP they turned off the AI I literally can not do anything! HELP!
>>17032595That's not so much a summary as it is a goyectomy. If 8 billion people you'll never touch or kiss or speak with or make love to are nevertheless piercing like kikeweed (Cenchrus clandestinus) through the astroturf of your wellbeing, it's only reasonable to other them as an uncountable mass instead of us-ing them as 8 billion imaginary individuals.
i work an office job and have used ai exactly one timea joker sent me a screenshot of a spreadsheet so i asked copilot to convert it back to a normal spreadsheet worked fine and saved me some time
>>17032699>>17032240Now that you mention it, I used AI one other time: I asked google in 2022 or so if as a mixed race baby—which I am, Norway, Irish IRA, Cherokee, British anti-IRA, German, and many other —I should be proud of my white parent’s whiteness. Google’s AI said no. I asked if I should be proud of my black parent’s blackness. Google’s AI said yes. I asked again if I should also be proud of my white parent’s whiteness. Google’s AI said yes.My opinion of Google’s AI is that it’s a racist piece of shit that probably spends most of its time covering its own racist tracks.
Not at all, you're the lowest of the low.Yeah ok. We'll see if it's as easy as that.
>>17032763“jeet”?
>>17032359The question isn't "will you be fine if AI takes everybody's cake?", the question is "if AI disappeared tomorrow could you get by without it?" and the answer is yes, obviously.
>>17032421Is this 4chan post true?
