>>34732638
Woops, well that's a good start.
>Living situation and status/history
should read
>Living situation and work status/history

I'm the type that's not what one would call winsome in my desired demographics. Being realistic here, not self-defeating.
Should I, and others like myself, apply or will you be flooded and would rather keep the intake smaller?

File: raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_(...).jpg (29 KB, 360x360)

29 KB JPG

>>34732638
It's another episode of guy makes a pseudo-matching thread just to get contacts of femanons for himself and match absolutely no one

>>34732701
I don't participate in the matchmaking myself and I am happy to provide proof of this. Open to suggestions. Obviously it's not like I can give out my address and passport number though.

>>34732691
Overall I would rather help match people who believe they are not desirable than those who believe they are desirable. People with more desirable profiles/stats have a lot more options after all, so they will not benefit as much from these threads I think.

Unless I get like a thousand applications I should be able to handle it at a decent pace. Certainly way faster than the other two current threads.

>>34732708
I see. Thanks.

>>34732701
Yup lmfao. There's a reason why so many copycats of this retarded thread concept started popping up. People realized that women are retarded and fall for this every time for whatever reason.

>>34732701
>>34733451
can't tell if this is bait or actual room temp iq posters

>>34732638
Some questions
>How does the verification system work, especially the text verification
>How detailed would you like the responses to be e.g., if I write a novel are you going to muddle through it
Some suggestions
>Sexual interests e.g., dom/sub/fetishes, might be important to know
>Relationship type e.g., open/poly/traditional
Both the above might fit into the existing questions and I'm being autistic so lemme know if that's the case. I imagine most people are going to want a traditional relationship so that's not likely to be hugely important, but sexual incompatibility is a real killer.

>>34733704
Thanks for the feedback. Right now I am opting for fewer, more open-ended questions to capture what most people think about. Sexual interests and relationship types should be captured in desired qualities and dealbreakers in general.
People who are looking for less traditional arrangements seem to be more forward with it, as they know it's not an easy sell to the average person.
They're both good points, though, and might deserve to be promoted to dedicated items.

>How does the verification system work, especially the text verification
In the questionnaire, people submit information about their ASL, looks, and credentials. When I say 'through text' I also include pictures, to be clear. The most basic level of verification is basically "is this a bot". Just a few message exchanges can check for this. For claim verification, I accept any document with sufficient evidence level, including censored pics, certificates, receipts, etc. and do mild forensics (reverse image search, except on people's faces; check for basic signs of manipulation or AI use, etc., nothing too extensive). I can also do voice checks to verify people's stated gender for those who would rather not share pics. I can also do videochats for the full verification.

The verification level for the various claims that have been validated will be marked and shared with matches, but not the evidence used. So for example someone may be "25F (video verified)" or someone could be "NASA engineer (image verified)" or of course "18/M/USA (unverified)".

Verification is purely on a voluntary basis but I will provide feedback if lack of validation has blocked potential matches for example.

Additionally, I will start reaching out for verification when there is a match on paper, before the pairs are contacted about it.

The responses are as short or long as you want. I will ask followups if there aren't enough details or if there may be a match but more clarity is needed.

Here comes the first update for the Matcher9000 matchmaking.

Total applications: 7
...of which incomplete: 1
M:F ratio: 4:3
Most common location: US
Most common education level: highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Matches so far: 0
Potential matches (requires further questioning): 1
Age range of cohort: 18-35

The most sought-after profile is a 25F in the US with at least a highschool degree who works fulltime and lives alone.

Stats should become more interesting over time, as more people join in.

As always, if anyone has any comments or feedback, please don't hesitate.

>>34732638
ive done 3 of these now and radio silence lol

>>34734262
Same. These cupid threads are all shit.

Quick note since it seems I was not clear in the OP: when answering the questionnaire, there are a total of 3 parts.

1. The top part of the questionnaire (between "Questionnaire:" and "Repeat the above [...]")
2. The same part as the above, but with answers relating to your preferred partner rather than yourself
3. The bottom part of the questionnaire, below the "Repeat the above [...]" part of the post.

Since the previous update, 7 more people applied. Of these, 3 have not yet answered the questionnaire. More stats will be posted tomorrow.

There is now another potential matching pair which may require a followup question or two to check.

I believe I have answered all applicants who have submitted a questionnaire so far. If you have submitted one as of this post, please ping me again on discord. At any rate, I will get back to everyone as soon as possible.

>>34734389
Clarification: if you have submitted a questionnaire and have not received any answer, please ping me. No need to reach out otherwise, aside from the usual (any questions, comments, etc.)

>>34732708
>I don't participate in the matchmaking myself and I am happy to provide proof of this. Open to suggestions. Obviously it's not like I can give out my address and passport number though.
Why not?

Bump for a real thread for real human beans.

Good morning everybody. I am back and will start processing the pending applications shortly. I have also received 6 more adds which have been accepted, feel free to post your questionnaire answers at any time.

>>34734403
Mostly because the reputation risk is too high given my position irl to be honest. Under some magical circumstances where some person who is both trusted by this thread and is unlikely to cause me trouble were to appear, I could actually even do that for the sake of proving myself.

Here comes the 2nd update.

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 20
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 1
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 13
...of which haven't answered yet: 6
...of which incomplete: 0
M:F ratio: 10:3
Age range of cohort: 18-40
Most common location: US
Most common education level: highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 4
People considered for matches: 6
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 45
Matches rejected: 2
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches awaiting confirmation: 1

>>34736569
>-62
Hey that's me

>>34736612
Scores that low are typically caused because there was an item in the dealbreaker list that I didn't catch before beginning match scoring.
Normally I only issue scores to couples who match the right location requirement (not 'ideal location' but 'most general allowable location'), sexual orientation, and age range.
In this case the age range were off but the other characteristics were looking good.

Update #3 (and last update of the day).

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 22
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 2
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 17
...of which haven't answered yet: 3
...of which incomplete: 0
M:F ratio: ~3/4 (i.e. 75:25)
Age range of cohort: 18-40
Most common location: exaequo US and eurozone
Most common education level: highschool (but college degree is gaining ground)
Most commonly requested minimal education level: highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: extreme right

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 7
People considered for matches: 10
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 4
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2

Most common reason for match rejection: not in preferred age range, not of preferred ethnicity (exaequo)

I would like to improve the M:F ratio further. My current strategy is to identify suitable threads and to advertise, but open to additional suggestions.

>>34737613
How many extremely mentally ill applications have you gotten? Extreme as in personality disorders, mentions of multiple stays in a mental hospital, etc

Advertising in all dating oriented threads might be a good idea. I'm unsure if you'd get banned, but r9k is full of single men and women, so trying there could help. I think cgl has a lot of single women as well. If you want to spend money you could buy an ad slot, I have a feeling women are more likely to be phoneposters and not use adblock.

>>34737643
judging by who he told me a potential match was Cassie is doing it so at least 1

>>34735941
Sir, you are posting on /soc/. There is no reputation nor a position. Only way to prove anything is to post your valid ID with a timestamped pic, so people can doxx you in case of failure.

>>34737657
im trying to understand why im receiving unnecessary hate. i am NOT extremely mentally ill. maybe slightly mentally ill but everyone on 4chan is at least slightly mentally ill so whats your point? why does everyone attack me for no reason? i literally mind my own business and its random pieces of garbage that go out of there way to try to make me mad and it works! let me tell you something little bitch, Cassie is extremely powerful, gorgeous, and intelligent. Watch your mouth. the difference between me and you is that you depend on this crappy matching tool to find you a mate. im just doing it for the kicks and giggles. worry about yourself before you worry about me. worry about losing weight and becoming intelligent. because as for me, i am perfect

>>34738378
>Cassie is extremely powerful, gorgeous, and intelligent.
Ur growing on me i hate to say it

>>34738439
nigs aren't smart enough to bait this is just pure unfiltered 60 iq jabbering and if that grows on you I'd recommend moving to the south side of Chicago

>>34738448
>60 iq jabbering
my responses are not supposed to be at academic level. i say what needs to be said and that is it. im not trying to appeal to anyone here. i have written on behalf for Bill Gates, Donald Trump, Tom Cruise, and other highly intelligent and successful white men. My IQ is 135. Do not try me. I am an academic scholar and loved by the white men in power.

>>34737643
There are no people in the data who have shared any mental illnesses. I will not play psychologist with the matchmaking pool because that is a little too much from an ethical point of view, but I will add notes from matches that have proceeded to be in contact and failed to connect. Such notes may include that one of the matches thought the other was not mentally stable enough.
Those notes are interpreted with a grain of salt and operate on a strike system to avoid the kind of people who try to attack/ban profiles they didn't like, for example.

I can share that there are 3 profiles that will have a particularly hard time getting matches due to personality, quirks, or requirements, however.

>>34737657
I don't discriminate against "famous posters" and I will not reveal if, who, or how many there are in the pool. All assumptions are made exclusively by the users and will never be confirmed or denied.

I also want to be clear that I only share key details of an application, not the whole questionnaire (so that people can break the ice this way, and to prevent identification before a match is performed). This means typically ASL (where L is the greatest common location, never the finer location that may have been shared), a few traits that match the desired profile, and a few traits that differ.

In case of a good paper match including dealbreakers that can classically be interpreted as negotiable, I open with only those and amend the profile data if the dealbreakers are indeed immutable. I also use this information to refine the scoring function I use for match finding.

File: 4788rg.gif (1.22 MB, 190x190)

1.22 MB GIF

>>34738545
>i have written on behalf for Bill Gates, Donald Trump, Tom Cruise, and other highly intelligent and successful white men. My IQ is 135.

The girl I'm talking with is so dry how can I get a refund?

>>34739631
I recommend, in chronological order, until the issue is addressed, to:
>chat for a little while longer to see if that changes
>communicating that you are not enjoying this
>agreeing that you are not a good match and moving on

Not all matches that look good on paper will be good in practice. My goal is to first reduce the amount of impossible/terrible matches to 0, second to improve the likelihood of a successful match as high as possible.
To do so, I rely on your experience through my services, and your feedback to refine the process, identify characteristics that could have predicted undesired outcomes, and improve the system's efficiency. This will, obviously, take time.

If you decide that you are not a match, I encourage you to reach out to me with feedback so that I can start the improvement process.

>>34739631
>how can I get a refund?
Your time will be refunded and deposited into your quantum bank account within 3 business light years. Have a nice day!

Here comes today's update. I will be less active for the rest of the day and will be back tomorrow.

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 37
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 2
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 24
...of which haven't answered yet: 11
...of which incomplete: 0
M:F ratio: 5:1
Age range of cohort: 18-40
Most common location: Eurozone
Most common education level: Highschool (college degrees a close second)
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Extreme right

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 8
People considered for matches: 11
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 4
Matches succeeded (i.e. contacts were exchanged): 2
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches awaiting confirmation: 1

Most common reason for match rejection: not in preferred age range, not of preferred ethnicity (exaequo)
Most common reason for otherwise matching profiles to not be matched: not in preferred age range. In one case it was off by 2 years.

I would still like to improve the M:F ratio further and I'm thinking about how to go about it.

>>34739877
>Eurozone
>US
Are Euros asking for Americans or is there something happening like Euros asking for specific EU countries?

>>34740431
A lot of people are open to LDRs. When they aren't, they're more likely to be US based and require a fellow american. So someone in the US would be able to fit into most location requirements, whereas Europeans often get filtered this way.

>>34739877
How are you scoring people?

>>34742523
I use a simple scheme based on a weighted sum of match attributes, with highly negative guardrail components to allow for soft-scoring through otherwise dealbreaking factors either through inadvertence or for trials when attempting to adjust the function.

I will share a new set of statistics soon, and am currently proceeding through profile processing and a new round of matchmaking.

>>34742655
I don't understand a fucking word you said, but you seem fucking intelligent as fuck desu. Can we trust your big computer brain to find us true love?

>>34742790
Every shot at love is less than a single digit % chance at best, anon.
No, you can't trust any one method, you just gotta try and most of the time it won't work, then keep trying. This is just one more option.

Here comes today's first (or only? We shall see) update.

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 48
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 41
...of which haven't answered yet: 4
...of which incomplete: 1
M:F ratio: 5:1
Age range of cohort: 18-40
Most common location: Eurozone
Most common education level: Highschool (college degrees a close second)
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 8
People considered for matches: 11
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 4
Matches succeeded (i.e. contacts were exchanged): 2
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches awaiting confirmation: 1

Most common reason for match rejection: not in preferred age range, not of preferred ethnicity (exaequo)
Most common reason for otherwise matching profiles to not be matched: not in preferred age range.

I focused on going through the profile backlog, if you have posted your questionnaire answers and did not receive my confirmation that I have processed your answers and have no followup questions at this time, please ping me so I can get back to you.

You may notice the match statistics have not yet changed. I am going to focus on a round of matchmaking when I have time throughout the day, so look forward to it. In the meantime I will be slower to process profiles.

>>34742790
It is ultimately as >>34742985 says.
My goal is to make the process as smooth and likely to work as possible, but I am not a telepath, nor a magician. I believe it should be possible to make 1/5 matches work right off the bat, and maybe 1/3 of these should be able to develop into the desired relationship type (e.g. long-term, short-term, marriage...) with a well-optimized process.
The current process is still early, so this is just a pie in the sky for now.

Updated match statistics.

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 20
People considered for matches: 23
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 4
Matches accepted: 2
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 10
Matches failed: 1

There is now just enough data to give an idea of the average profile for the M and F in the cohort.

Average M:
26/M/US or Europe. White with brown hair and eyes, average weight. 179cm (5'10''). Looking for long-term, eventually to marry and have children with a white or asian woman. Shy, introverted, into videogames and anmie. Drinks sometimes, doesn't do drugs or smoke. Highest education level was highschool, currently works in tech. Lives alone or looking to do so. Politically a left-leaning centrist. Looking for a relaxed, openminded, caring partner with a positive attitude who shares some interests in common. On average, had 1 previous relationship. His ideal date is one where he can have a great time simply talking together, and he wants a partner he can share a good chat, interests, and life events with.

Average F:
22/F/Europe. Brown hair and eyes, 165cm (5'5'') tall. Average weight. Looking for a masculine, clean, white or asian man at least 5'9''. Glasses a bonus. 2 previous partners on average. Wants to be taken on a coffee or restaurant date and expects to share a lot of affection with a partner.. In it for the longterm, but not sure about having children. Into anime and videogames. The ideal man will obsess over her, and be mature and calm. She is shy and introverted, so he needs to be confident to take things forward. Politically, she is a left-leaning centrist. She has a highschool degree and is currently enrolled in college, living either at home or in the dorms.

Pretty standard I would say, but a lot less crazy than some of the claims I've seen posted around sometimes.

>>34743867
>Average F:
>Looking for a white or asian man at least 5'9''.
oh kek I'm screwed lmao omg I'm fucked hahahaha

>>34743867
White women were a mistake. White men have realistic expectations while women want a chad with glasses because they themselves are nerdy while being whores without much value themselves (more than 1 partner = used up whore). I pitty most men for being cucks or having to stay alone otherwise.

>>34743952
>>34743996
Both the M and F version are an amalgamated average and does not represent any person. Some of these properties are linked at some level. For example, someone who lives independently is more likely to want likewise of their partner, but this isn't captured in this kind of portrait.

>>34744004
>makes generalized statement
>t-that's just a generalized statement
Yeah no shit illiterate.

>>34743867
I am now understanding that the things I want are not normal. I keep not submitting an application but if I'm this far from the norm in my desire then maybe I should
Question:
Do you worry that posting average profiles like this will allow bad actors to lie about themselves more easily and game the system?

>>34743867
I love them and wish they have many wasian babies together.

>>34744083
I avoid providing too many statistics about extremes because I am worried those extremes could be targeted. I am not as worried about averages like these because the likelihood of an average profile matching a real person is very slight (no individual is average, and matches are between individuals and not between populations).
Moreover, I use a strike system to reduce bad actors. This will only become relevant at scale, but also it is only at scale that bad actors can deal real damage.

File: IMG_2182.gif (3.3 MB, 286x374)

3.3 MB GIF

>>34732638
Just submitted my answers, thanks for the effort Anon.
>>34743867
Literally me, except I got rid of my glasses some time ago.

Just going to leave a quick note that I will be less available tomorrow. I will do some more profile processing in the morning, especially to get through the queue I have received in the past couple hours as well as to approve the new adds overnight.
I will be able to return after 7pm CET or so at my usual pace.

My priority will be:
>processing ongoing matches
>processing new profiles
>pinging adds who have not answered the questionnaire
>performing another matchmaking round

In this order. I will post updates to the thread, as any other day.

I'm done for the morning and will come back to continue processing profiles tonight. I will also post complete stats then. In the meantime, here are some quick key figures: there are now 50 filled profiles in the database, and 59 non-retracted, non-filled profiles. A total of 5 accepted matches vs 9 rejected. The main rejection reason has become: match partner too fat. 3 of the matches seem to be doing well so far and I will be continuing to collect feedback to improve the process.

If I did not send you a message this morning where I confirmed that your answers have been processed, and explaining validation to you, that means you are still in the backlog and I will get back to you tonight.

>>34746027
>match partner too fat
So which of the two sexes are the one making the rejections here anon?

>>34747145
So far it has been roughly equal between both.

>>34743746
>Highest match score: 63
I'm curious about this number. Is it on a scale of 1-100? Or is it theoretically uncapped? At what threshold do you currently strongly consider someone for a match?

>>34747366
It's theoretically uncapped. In practice, the current minimum possible score is -445 and the maximum possible score is 73.

>>34747434
>the current minimum possible score is -445
This the point where if you left the two alone in a room together you'd come back to find one of them dead I imagine.

Today's current stats:

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 64
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 56
...of which haven't answered yet: 3
...of which incomplete: 2
M:F ratio: 13:2
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: USA
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 0

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 20
People considered for matches: 23
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 8
Matches accepted: 6
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 1
Matches failed: 1

Most common reason for match rejection: body type a dealbreaker.
Most common reason for otherwise matching profiles to not be matched: not in preferred age range.

>>34747453
I process matches in a 2 phase process. First I perform filtering based on dealbreakers, age, location, etc. Then I perform scoring of surviving match candidates. Any score above 0 is then proposed (the threshold will shift overtime as I understand better which properties are more indicative of a successful match, as will the score ranges, indicator factors, and their weights).
The reason why it can go that low is purely for safety reason if I missed a dealbreaker in the filtering phase. It's basically a way to flag this despite the mistake to really, really not perform the match.

>>34747469
Do you tell applicants what their relative scores are at any point?

>>34747487
No, that information wouldn't have any meaning even if I did, because the score can be updated over time and my internal scoring system WILL NEVER align with that of the individuals which I match, as it is designed and being optimized for a totally different purpose.

I will sometimes note that a match is a borderline match, especially if I present more than one match, but I will never reveal which, and I will avoid mentioning that fact if there are less than 3 matches.

While mentioning that fact can cause bias in the selection process, it is my belief that the direction of the bias is productive to forming a good match pair because the person being matched will use their own internal evaluation to decide. Moreover, ultimately, all matches are matches. It is best to go for what seems best to you on its face and go down the list if it doesn't work out.

I have now processed all profiles in the queue. If you have sent me a questionnaire and I have not yet told you that your responses are done being processed, please let me know and I'll get right on it.
Otherwise I will now be reminding people who have added me but not yet posted their questionnaire that their application is still pending, and proceeding to a new matchmaking phase.

>>34747469
>Soft-banned profiles: 1
damn who was that lol

>>34747604
A profile who was matched and then stopped responding to both the match and to me.

>>34747606
don't you also want to find love matchmaker?

>>34747617
No.

>>34747641
why not?

>>34747901
There are too many people who want to find love and can't. I am tired of watching. I can't wave a magic wand around and fix it, but I can try.
That is what I care about.

>>34747469
>M:F ratio: 13:2
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH worse then any dating app, waste of time to even try anything here. I have no idea why so many men try to play in a market where women have the absolute buying power.

Can I pay like 4 dollars for 2 day shipping? Thx

>>34747978
I promise if it were 1:1 no one would want you anyway

>>34748032
anon doesn't understand you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Statistically some people will get matched, and women especially are likely to get some kind of match, unless they don't want to date guys in the states or over 25 I guess.

>>34748032
Are you a woman by any chance because your entire argument is very feminine trying to insult me by denying me access to women by proxy
>no woman will give you access to her holes
Who says I want any woman from here?

>>34748075
if you see the truth as an insult, you definitely need to look inward, not outward

>>34748082
Okay you are a woman good to know. I pitty every single man who even wastes a single second filling out this form and doxxing themselves to this guy just for the "chance" to talk to some entitled bitch.

>>34748092
Are you on the wrong board anon? It's fucking /soc/ sharing your info is kind of the point.

>>34748092
>everyone who disagrees with me is literally hitler: incel edition

File: 1766233954908402.jpg (431 KB, 1080x1119)

431 KB JPG

>>34748119
Again denying access to your hole or any other by proxy is not a real argument or insult. Most women don't have that much value.
>>34748110
It is a waste of time in that case.

>>34748082
>>34748151

hii when r u going to find Cassie a match? she has been waiting patiently for you to match her with her dream white man. please hurry up the process. she wants the gift of love please and do it quickly.SHE IS THE NEXT WOMAN TO BE MATCHED PLEASE EBONY GODDESS CASSIE

>>34748440
Each person in the match pool has equal priority and matchmaking rounds are performed routinely. If you have not received notification that more matches are available, it means there are no suitable candidates at this time. This can be for multiple reasons, such as failing age or location requirements, or due to either potential match expressing a dealbreaker that clearly applies.

Please do not submit fake or duplicate profiles yet. Creating a convincing fake profile is difficult. As my strategy is to always err on the side of caution, I only annotate fake profiles instead of disqualifying them. However, please note that all associated profiles will be challenged simultaneously if any of them is found to be a bad actor.
A bad actor means someone who has applied with no intent to actually pursue a relationship, such as to attempt to mine data, to insult or mock users, for the purpose of scamming or demanding money, or any other such purposes. In particular, while ghosting a match will result in a note in your file and may result in being deprioritized if done too often, so long as you remain in the process in good faith (e.g. by continuing to share feedback), you may remain in the pool.
If anyone encounters a bad actor, please contact me directly so that I can add the appropriate annotation and deprioritize or ban the associated profile.
Beyond bad actors, everyone else is welcome to apply, and you can always reach out to me if you would like to update your profile.

>>34738545
You are so boring.

>>34749381
>Please do not submit fake or duplicate profiles
I can understand fake profiles, but what the fuck is the point of a duplicate when you're personally vetting and inputting everything yourself? It's not like cupid's attempts which were depersonalized google forms and something could get lost in the noise. You have to personally speak to and confirm every possible applicant.

>>34747978
>M:F ratio: 13:2
>HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH worse then any dating app
Better than dating apps, actually.
No one cares to bot the /soc/ matchmaker #4 to get dudes to pay for premium.

Today's current stats:

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 83
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 67
...of which haven't answered yet: 14
...of which incomplete: 2
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: USA
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 0

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 21
People considered for matches: 25
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 9
Matches accepted: 6
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 3
Matches failed: 1

Most common reason for match rejection: body type a dealbreaker.
Most common reason for otherwise matching profiles to not be matched: not in preferred age range.

>>34750406
Correction:

>Match statistics
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0

>>34750406
>not in preferred age range.
Been wondering about this one, how far outside of the preferred age range are the potential candidates on average?

>>34750411
It varies quite a bit. In a few cases, it's very close (1 or 2 years). Sometimes it's quite far (15 years in one case).

>>34750413
I guess it would be worth asking the women if they're okay with a partner who's only a year or two outside of their preferred range. Especially if they have high potential as is (unless you're already doing that)

>>34750441
I probed this pattern a few times and consistently received a consistent 'no' answer. For efficiency's sake, I now take a hard stance on age ranges. I am using the same logic to harden the matching logic regarding different kinds of dealbreakers (e.g. dealbreakers related to personality, appearance, or otherwise), i.e. I start with a flexible stance and harden them over time.

>>34750450
that is a lot of work, why do all of this for /soc/?

>>34750812
Because >>34747958
It is in my nature to want to improve things. There is no reason.

>>34750450
>consistently received a consistent 'no' answer
Truly, life is pain for the anons in their late 20s.

>>34750073
HOW THE HELL AM I BORING? YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ME CUNT. UR A RUDE ASS BITCH. IM NEVER BORING. IM THE MOST ENTERTAINING MOST SOPHISTICATED MOST FUN PERSON EVER. DONT TRY ME

>>34750450
What's the average preferred age range for men vs women?

File: shocked-face-dude.gif (216 KB, 220x258)

216 KB GIF

>>34750912

>>34751192
Average minimum is 22. Many have no upper bound, but among those with a bound, the maximum average is 34.

>>34752669
Clarification: this is for the women.
For the men: average minimum is 21, average maximum is 35. Unbounded cases are rarer.
As of today, the average age for men is 26, while for women, it is 21.

>>34752669
>>34752695
Honestly surprised the age limit is so high. I feel like many places (especially things like reddit) people make a huge deal of age gaps, while as a man I always thought it was kind of silly.

My sister acts like I'm a pedo for thinking girls in their mid 20s are hot.

>>34752669
My max is 64 F. HMU

Tg Martin Coombs

>>34753462
The reality is that there is no pattern. With 67 highly biased entries you might as well get your data from TV static. Drawing conclusions from statistical means is fruitless, there's barely anything there to begin with while outliers poison the data.

>>34753545
Thank you Mr. Coom.

>>34753546
That is overall correct except that most of the data is concentrated around the average when it comes to limits. When it comes to age, however, there is a clear bimodal distribution (one clustered around 19, one around 26 for men; 18 and 30 for women).
As you say, ultimately with so little data it's not very robust, though it exceeds statistical standards for these kinds of data.

>>34753710
So why publish these metrics at all if they don't give any meaningful indication of anything? All you're doing is risking people's privacy by making it possible to profile them.

>>34753813
He has to entertain himself somehow with this totally useless flavor of the month data mining spamming then catalog recently.

>>34753813
There is more than enough information that there is 0 risk of any kind of information leakage from these statistics. It is also why I have updated the kind of statistics I have been publishing over time as more data becomes available.

The primary purpose of these statistics is, nevertheless, entertainment.

>>34753834
Want to make a bet on that? You've already profiled people yourself.

>>34753813
To show people there's stuff going on in the background they're not privy to other than OP lmaogettingFadds.
Also for number nerds.

>>34753840
Given that people have been matched, there is always the possibility that you are one of the people who got matched and will be using this information as a ploy.

That said, if you can point to the data origin in this thread and add profile data that matches something reasonably unique, I will adjust the data reports to avoid such leakage in the future.

Today's current stats:

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 91
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 76
...of which haven't answered yet: 12
...of which incomplete: 2
...of which retracted: 1
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: USA
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 21
People considered for matches: 25
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 9
Matches accepted: 6
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 3
Matches failed: 1

Most common reason for match rejection: body type a dealbreaker.
Most common reason for otherwise matching profiles to not be matched: not in preferred age range.

A new round of matchmaking will start soon.

>>34753926
hard banned?

>>34753978
One person was apparently just there to spam dick pics and refused to elaborate. As a result, the profile was banned with no allowable recovery.
By comparison, the soft-banned profile will not be prioritized in future matches, but is welcome to come back (and sufficient good behavior will remove the soft-ban).

>>34753983
most well adjusted soc user

There are now 85 total profiles with 5 new applicants overnight, and 82 filled profiles. This excludes the 3 who retracted before answering and the 1 who retracted after answering.
There was no update on matchmaking yesterday, but I am hoping to get a match or two today.
In a few days, I will also be checking in on the previous successful matches and update those who decided they did not work well together. During this process, the matchmaking score function and personal files will both be updated to improve the quality of matches across the board going forward by collecting feedback from the people who got matched.

Today's current stats:

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 94
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 88
...of which haven't answered yet: 3
...of which incomplete: 8
...of which retracted: 1
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 26
People considered for matches: 28
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 10
Matches accepted: 7
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 5
Matches failed: 1

>>34756775
>7:1 M:F Ratio
Does the "female" count include trans people as well? That's surprisingly decent all things considered.

>>34756775
What's the LGBT:straight ratio looking like so far? Given how the M:F ratio is 7:1, surely a lot of those men are at least bi.

File: IMG_0322.jpg (78 KB, 860x547)

78 KB JPG

CASSIE STILL HAS NOT BEEN MATCHED SO WE CAN ALL SAY IN UNISON THAT THIS MATCH GAME SUCKS. I WAS FULLY EXPECTING TO FIND MY WHITE HUBAND VIA MATCHER9000. I AM DISAPPOINTED AND WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS TO ANYONE. WHERE IS MY MATCH? IM CURRENTLY SICK AND SWEATING AND IM JUST WAITING ON MY MATCH PEACEFULLY.

>>34757222
Stfu you dumb bitch, get back in line and wait up like everybody else.

>>34757320
i am THE Cassie so i deserve FIRST PRIORITY OVER ANYONE ELSE. I AM A FAMOUS QUEEN ON HERE. IF I DONT GET MATCHED, THEN NO ONE SHOULD GET BANNED. I DEMAND THIS MATCH GAME TO BE DESTROYED IMMEDIATELY. AND NO I WONT GET IN LINE FAGGOT DONT TELL ME WHAT TO DO

>>34757222
The main issue for you is that the vast majority of white men explicitly do not want to match with a black woman. There has been a few match candidates here and there, but they weren't located in the US. Unfortunately, your criteria are too stringent for the current pool.

>>34757216
Interestingly, the LGBT:Straight ratio mirrors the M:F ratio (it is 1:7). This is mostly due to bi and pan men.

>>34756775
>Age range of cohort: 18-45
Guessing most of those are on the very low end, many of the women I’ve talked to on here in the past are usually early 20s so I could see being late 20s like myself as a barrier. Very interesting to see the data regardless I will say

Hi, I'm new to this. Can you give me the link to contact you on Discord?

>>34758011
Why are you allowing racists?

>>34758579
I do not discriminate in any way except for one: people who join must genuinely want to form a relationship of these type.

I use the criteria and the answers to avoid matching non-compatible people, such as a racist man with a black girl, or a girl who hates nerds with a videogame addict.

Beside this, it is up to the matched pair to see if they are what they were looking for or not. I update scoring functions and profiles based on feedback from both parties to improve match quality over time.

Other than that, I provide matching that should be as unbiased as possible.

you should probably hard ban cassie, that bitch is crazy

>>34759023
Cassie has not yet misbehaved in any way. There is therefore no reason for her to be banned in any way.
The same rule applies for her as for anyone else.
Additionally, in connection to my earlier post, I also do not discriminate based on people's personality, mental state, sanity, or other parameters, so long as these characteristics are reasonably provided.

>>34759023
>>34759032
LOLOLOL IMAGINE HATING ON ME AND TRYING TO GET ME BANNED FROM MATCHER9000 JUST FOR HIM TO SAY HE WILL NOT BE BANNING THE CASSIE. LOLOL YOU LOOK LIKE A FOOL NOW. THERE IS NO REASON FOR ME TO GET BANNED. OKAY I TAKE BACK WHAT I SAID, MATCHER9000 IS BASED AND EVERYONE SHOULD PLAY THE MATCH GAME. I AM SORRY ABOUT THE WORDS I SAID ABOVE. YOU ARE ACTUALLY VERY PROFESSIONAL AND RESPECTFUL AND I LIKE THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ONLY REASON I HAVENT BEEN MATCHED YET IS BECAUSE IM A SEXY BLACK QUEEN AND A LOT OF WHITE MEN CANT HANDLE ME SO ITS OKAY. ANYWAYS IF I DONT GET MATCHED ME AND MATCHER9000 WILL GET TOGETHER AND BECOME THE ULTIMATE COUPLE SO SUCK IT LOSERS. MATCHER9000 IS AWESOME GUYS I LOVE HIM SO MUCH YAYY!

>>34759067
i really like reading your comments cassie, i know its just a bit but thanks for playing the character anyway, its really fun, i hope you find someone you like

File: D35E7CA8-4774-4F32-A070-4(...).gif (922 KB, 500x220)

922 KB GIF

>>34759093
AWWW I LOVE ALL OF MY FANS. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALL OF THE SUPPORT. THIS IS NOT A BIT BUT I APPRECIATE THE KIND WORDS. THIS IS TRULY WHO I AM AT MY CORE. I HOPE I FIND SOMEONE I LIKE TOO.

We've reached a milestone today! 100 adds so far!

Today's current stats:

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 100
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 96
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 6
...of which retracted: 1
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 26
People considered for matches: 28
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 10
Matches accepted: 7
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 5
Matches failed: 2

>>34759269
Damn, and still no woman in the USA wants to match with my perverted degenerate ass? :(

>>34759752
At least you're just looking in the US. I'm going worldwide and I still haven't gotten matched.

>>34759752

foid here who has been burned by these threads tempted to just start collecting contacts of guys who werent matched like pokemon and find my own match. though it does occur to me that there may be a REASON these individuals havent been matched, whats the worst that could happen?

>>34759970
matter of fact im just going to make a matchmaking thread to collect moid contacts for myself. women in male dominated fields or whatever

>>34759970
Why do you think you haven't been matched is there something horrible about you please tell me

>>34759980

considering the excuse everyone gets is “i havent found a good match for you yet” i think these threads are run by turbo autists who dont understand nuance and are a bit too rigorous trying to filter through potential dealbreakers and incompatibilities

>>34759988

i will say out of maybe five or six i applied to i have been matched in three of these threads. in all three instances the person running the thread matched me WITH HIMSELF and admitted to it shamelessly. after that i stopped giving these dudes my info

>>34759988
It takes a true autist to run a thing like this, no offense to OP. Still, if you're not getting matches from any of these threads as a woman I have to think there's something in your profile that's not working given the gender imbalance. What are your dealbreakers?
>>34759995
>matched me WITH HIMSELF
lel. I wanted to make one of these threads but only match people who were clearly incompatible but that's too much work

>>34759995
>the person running the thread matched me WITH HIMSELF
What a nigger thing to do. I hope OP isn't like this.

>>34760004
i have VERY FEW strict dealbreakers but in my applications i mentioned which non-dealbreaker traits would be undesirable in a partner, which is why i worry that nuance was lacking and that anyone who had one or two of these undesirable traits might have been thrown aside.

my hard dealbreakers were: Black, Indian, More than 15 years older than me, Under the age of 18, Lives on a different continent, Believes in feminism, Fat and doesn’t want to lose the weight, or Wants to be a NEET for the rest of his life

>>34760048
actually now that i think about it im pretty sure believing in feminism and living on the same continent werent even hard dealbreakers they were just things i said i wouldnt prefer

>>34760048
That's weird, I was under the impression there were a lot of right wing / trad guys here who couldn't get matched due to their political beliefs. I assumed someone like you would get matched faster than other women.

>>34760048
>my hard dealbreakers were: Black, Indian
LOL I'm one of those. What do you have against us? We're not all the same, ya know!

>>34760064
i mean, every time i got accosted by matchmaker anons, it was because the matchmaker anon himself was right wing and couldnt find any girls who shared his beliefs. so there is a chance 50% of the matchmakers are racist and the other 50% are determined to stop racist people from finding love

>>34760048

I can't speak for anyone else but I don't fit any of those dealbreakers. I'm White, work full time, doubt I'm 15 years older, not fat. Maybe different continent? I'm from the US.

>>34760076
okay well every single Indian I have ever argued with without fail repeats one of the same three comebacks (Your mom is a whore) (American kids get shot in schools) (India is #1) so im almost certain they are all the same

and with how high the violent crime rates are and how freakishly strong the average black man is compared to the average white woman i dont think im obligated to risk my life by opening my dating pool to black guys whether they actually ARE one of the good ones or not. plus i am not sexually attracted to black men

>>34760084

i meaan if matchmaker anon drops the ball on you you can always drop your contact. im in the us too. i wont be posting my contact for what should be obvious reasons. maybe a burner email if youre really finicky about posting yours

>>34760093
my contact is
discord: yuta_2932

I have an email if you'd prefer that too.

|'m also not a believer in feminism even remotely. lol So yeah i check all those boxes.

>>34760103

anon i hate you and youve ruined my life. the friend request i sent you was the straw that broke the camels back for discord thinking i am a bot and now theyre demanding i link my REAL ACTUAL phone number or lose access to my account permanently.. you will hear from me when this is resolved, maybe even from a shiny new discord account

>>34760115
I'm sorry anon. I mean I didn't intentionally do anything but sorry none the less. lol

>>34760115
my burner email is : shinhayata54@gmail.com


if that helps at all.

>>34760119

okay i made a new discord account and i decided i dont hate you and you didnt ruin my life so i added you please accept my request

>>34760115
What's wrong with using your phone number? I used my phone number when I created my discord account. No problem.

>>34760048
I had fat, black, antisocial, and severely mentally ill as strict dealbreakers and he tried to match me with Cassie so idk maybe he's just clinically insane
I also do not fit any of your dealbreakers unless you're 5 years old or not in the US, unsure what is happening here. Unless you put you're bpd or something similar

File: 1743525201686504.gif (936 KB, 230x140)

936 KB GIF

>>34760252
>I had fat, black, antisocial, and severely mentally ill as strict dealbreakers and he tried to match me with Cassie so idk maybe he's just clinically insane

>>34760234

the Jews. i will not elaborate

>>34760252

the only real red flags i mentioned are that i have autism and i am kind of racist, but also i didnt apply to this one so i cant speak on my match potential with the people in this thread. i originally popped into this thread just to joke about my real experience with these threads being used to collect foid contacts for the supposed matchmaker

>>34760343
oh you made it seem like you applied to this one and never got a match and was wondering why
the only other one I tried was cupid but he just ghosted, pinnacle of soc

>>34760352

i can tell you with 100% certainty that Cupid anon matched himself with AT LEAST three women who all rejected him and there may be more that we dont know of

>>34760364
lol, always thought the train of thought that "they're just collecting tags" was retarded because obviously they'd be rejected, but I guess some people are that dumb

>>34760366
itd be one thing if they put in some effort and made PRETEND matches with themselves that look like they happened naturally, but multiple matchmaker anons have messaged me FROM THEIR MATCHMAKER ACCOUNT to shoot their shot

>>34760343
You would have matched with me if you applied. Unfortunate, cause I only had 1 match and got rejected because someone slightly better than me came along I guess

>>34760383

its okay anon youre #1 on my list when i make one of these tarded catfish threads to collect moid contacts and i will treat you better than that wench did

>>34760252
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU? WHY DO U BITCHES KEEP BRINGING ME UP FOR NO REASON. YOU GUYS ARE SO OBSESSED WITH ME. BITCH. IF YOUR GONNA OBSESSES OVER ME AT LEAST SHOWER ME WITH COMPLIMENTS. STOP PRETENDING TO HATE ME. WE ALL KNOW YOU SECRETLY LOVE ME U FUCKING FAGGOT SO BEHAVE. GOODNESS GRACIOUS. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH ME SO IF YOU DONT WANT TO GET MATCHED WITH ME THEN THATS GONNA BE THE WORST MISTAKE YOUVE EVER MADE IN YOUR LIFE BC IM UNIRONICALLY THE BEST WOMAN ON PLANET EARTH AND THE BEST FUTURE WIFE ON PLANET EARTH. YOU WILL NOT FIND A WOMAN AS GOOD AS ME OR BETTER. ALL OTHER WOMEN WILL BE JUST “MEH” STOP HATING ON CASSIE BC SHE IS PERFECTION. THE ONLY PART I DONT FIT IS FAT AND BLACK BUT ALL OF MY FAT IS IN THE RIGHT PLACES U CUNT. AND IF U CANT HANDLE A FAT BLACK LADY THEN UR JUST A FAGGOT WHO NEEDS HELP. YOU WILL DIE ALONE IF YOU KEEP THIS UP BC THERE IS NO WOMAN WHO WILL WANT A TWINK LIKE YOU BITCH. UR AN ASSHOLE AND THATS THE REASON WHY U HAVENT BEEN MATCHED YET. YOU WHITE MEN PRETEND THAT U DONT LIKE BLACK WOMEN YET ARE THE SAME ONES WHO JERK OFF TO BIG BEAUTIFUL BLACK WOMAN GETS BLEACHED BY BWC. STUPID CUNT. IM HUNGRY AND I WANT TO EAT BUT INSTEAD IM RESPONDING TO HATE COMMENTS THAT I SHOULDNT BE GETTING. IF YOU DONT LIKE ME THEN KEEP IT TO YOURSELF BOZO BUT THERES NO REASON TO PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE UR HATRED TOWARDS ME. I RECOMMEND YOU GO TO A FUCKING THERQPIST AND SEEK HELP BC ANYONE WHO DOESNT LIKE ME IS MENTALLY ILL. YEAH THATS RIGHT UR THE ONE WHO IS MENTALLY ILL, NOT ME. I HAVE 135 IQ PLUS NO MENTAL ILLNESSES EXCEPT FOR NARCISSISM BUT THAT IS A MISDIAGNOSIS AND THEY SHOULDVE DIAGNOSED ME WITH BEING A BEAUTIFUL CONFIDENT BLACK EBONY GODDESS INSTEAD. ALSO NO HATING ON MATCHER9000. HE DID HIS JOB AND TRIED TO MATCH US TOGETHER TO TRY TO HELP U GET A BEAUTIFUL BLACK QUEEN BUT UR DUMBASS TURNED IT DOWN. WORST MISTAKE OF UR LIFE BTW. BUT THATS OKAY. YOU DO WHATEVER U WANT BC AT THE END OF THE DAY UR THE LOSER.

>>34760461

Cassie, black women are bottom of the barrel, and so are fat women…. be real

File: 1765072794749844.png (14 KB, 1164x1080)

14 KB PNG

>>34760400
Ms. Foid I don't want to be collected like a moid yugio card for some discord harem. I just want love. Fuck my autism chudcel baka life

File: 6f8.png (247 KB, 760x572)

247 KB PNG

>>34760364
>>34760382

>>34760252
>I had fat, black, antisocial, and severely mentally ill as strict dealbreakers and he tried to match me with Cassie
S tier trolling.
If dozens of Anons giving him their data over a week was the setup for this punchline I'd kneel.

>>34760674
The OP for this particular one is probably the most autistic of all the wannabe matchmakers. So I wouldn't be surprised if he just genuinely thought Cassie would be a decent match, somehow.

>>34759970
I recommend that you join the system and contact me if you have poor outcomes and would like to understand why.
While I will not deanonymize members in the service, I am willing to share key indicators at any rate.

Otherwise, if you are willing to deal with the risks that are entailed, you are welcome to post contact details in these threads and let people contact you. I will not add you to the service unless you explicitly ask for it by adding me on discord and providing your answers there.

>>34760252
Cassie does not count as mentally severely ill nor antisocial.
Your other requirements were strongly aligned with cassie's profile, which is why I clearly outlined in the match profile overview that despite this, it might be a dealbreaker that she is fat and black.
The purpose of this match attempt is in line with >>34759988
Namely, testing exactly how strict dealbreakers are.
Based on the information I obtain from these random validations, I update the matchmaking process and annotate profiles to better guide the matching process.

>>34760679
Overall, except if posters deanonymize themselves, I do not reveal any information about match details.
However, I make it a point to work with the profiles given to me and to ignore any information that may be assumed, or that is presumed by other posters, from e.g. previously known identities.

>>34760064
For information, there are very few very right wing or trad guys in the current service. While it causes a couple harder matches, generally speaking that hasn't been the blocker for them either.

>>34761115
>Cassie does not count as mentally severely ill nor antisocial
who the fuck does then if not the person who sits on 4chan for hours each day trying and failing to grasp for attention in every unrelated thread possible while spam adding every person she sees

File: IMG_0392.jpg (80 KB, 960x720)

80 KB JPG

>>34761258
BTW IM NOT FAILING TO GET ATTENTION. I LIVE RENT FREE IN YALLS HEAD UNIRONICALLY. ALL OF YOU HOES ARE OBSESSED WITH ME. IM SHAKING ASS IN THE CLUB WITH MY HOMEGIRLS WHILE IM TYPING THIS. ALSO THE THINGS YOU LISTED ARE NOT SIGNS OF A MENTAL ILLNESS. IM JUST THE QUEEN OF SOC SO I NEED TO MAKE SURE I ENTERTAIN MY FANS ALL DAY EVERYDAY. ITS NOT EASY TO BE SOC FAMOUS, BELIEVE ME. IT TAKES DEDICATION AND PASSION TO CARRY THIS COUNTRY. AND I ABSOLUTLEY DO NOT SPAM. IM JUST ALLOWED TO POST WHEREEVR I WANT BECAUSE I AM THE QUEEENNOF SOC I DO NOT HAVE ISSUES I DO COMMIT AT LEAST I CAN ADMIT ILL BE GOOD LOVE TO YOU. IM GOOD IN BED TOO. ANYWAYS, LEAVE ME ALONE FAGGOT. IM PERFECT WITH NO MENTAL ILLNESSS EXCEPT FOR THE MENTAL ILNESS OF BEING A BAD BITCH AMD A KING IM BAD BLOOD. im the CASSIE IM THE CASSIE. HOLD UP GIVE ME A MINUTE , I AM THE CASSIE AND IM ALLOWED TO DO WHATEVER I WANT. WHATS SO BAD ABOUT ME BEING A HAPPY GIRL ON SOC. IM NOT MENTALLY ILL OR ANTISOCIAL. IM ACTUALLY VERY SOCIABLE AND IM 135 IQ AND A CLEAR MIND.

>>34761258
To clarify, Cassie would only count as antisocial or severely ill if one of the following conditions are met:
>She wishes to amend her profile with this information
>She is matches with someone who provides this information as feedback, then gets matched with someone else who also provides this same feedback
In Cassie's case, the situation is a little sketchy because she is a known poster, which means that matches could deliberately give this feedback on account of being matched with Cassie as opposed to because this is what they found to be true. However, I remain committed to apply the same rules to all members in the system by default. I will adjust rules on a case-by-case basis only if strictly required.

>>34759970
>collecting contacts of guys who werent matched like pokemon
least machiavellian woman

>>34760048
How old are you?

>>34761282
At this point i dont even know if this is someone roleplaying as a retard or an actual skizo, we are at a level worse than chickn and mike combined at this point...

File: 1753219397045624.png (201 KB, 600x445)

201 KB PNG

>>34761282
>IM 135 IQ AND A CLEAR MIND

Today's current stats:

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 111
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 99
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 3
...of which retracted: 1
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 26
People considered for matches: 28
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 63
Matches rejected: 11
Matches accepted: 7
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2
Matches failed: 4

Due to other obligations, I will unfortunately not have time to do a matchmaking round today. However, I will do one tomorrow.

>>34762306
>7 accepted
>4 failed
it's so over

>>34739145
>I can share that there are 3 profiles that will have a particularly hard time getting matches due to personality, quirks, or requirements, however.
I'll be number 4 for sure, and I would personally love to see how similar I am to the other 3 to see if I'm better or worse

I'm assuming those 3 are all men, right?

>>34762306
>7 accepted
>3 not yet failed
we're so back

>>34763119
As a matter of fact, no.

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 115
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 3
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 105
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 1
...of which retracted: 2
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 43
People considered for matches: 43
Lowest match score: -62*
Highest match score: 63*
Matches rejected: 11
Matches accepted: 7
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2*
Matches failed: 4

I am processing a large number of matches today, so it will take some time for me to get through them. I figured I'd post an update to give an idea of what's on the table. I have done the match filtering phase only, no scoring or execution yet, therefore items with * will update later.

>>34765069
Hey anon. Can i still join?

>>34765076
There is no time limit or anything. I am just focusing on the current matchmaking round, so I will process your profile at a later time. There are a few other profiles in the queue also waiting for processing at the moment.
I perform matchmaking rounds on an ongoing basis iteratively with processing new profiles. I aim to perform at least one matchmaking round every 3 days. As for profile processing, I do it on a continuous basis based on my availability.

>>34765069
>gets excited
>then realizes that it's been over a week
>and will probably never get matched

>>34765176
Feel free to reach out on discord and I can have a look at why you might not have been in a match yet.

>>34732638
just a reminder that "matchmaking" is "forcing pairs" and not genuine relationships.
The "break-up" rate of a 'first pairing' is 100%
though after the break-up you could technically take your "matchmaked" ex back from the "exes" pool and start an actual relationship.

itt. only use matchmaking if you are fine without the entire emotional aspect of dating.

>>34765457
The point of matchmaking is to improve the odds of a relationship working out and to see if building a relationship with the person you were matched with is plausible or not.
Otherwise I am not sure what you are trying to say. But it is true that just because you are matched doesn't mean you will build a working relationship.

>>34765457
>The "break-up" rate of a 'first pairing' is 100%
>though after the break-up you could technically take your "matchmaked" ex back from the "exes" pool
What?

>>34759970
>>34760343

Not gonna lie, just from reading this thread you seem like someone who I would love to get in contact with to just talk to as a friend if not date or match or whatever. Assuming you read this.

Add me on discord: gatoractual554

Daily reminder that y'all fuckin' retards to keep breaking into smaller and smaller groups and should be just encouraging people to all go to the same damn places already established, like Duolicious, which was built specifically as a 4chan dating site.

30 people on yet another fuckin' discord or a new Google spreadsheet by yet another data-miner ain't doin shit.

>>34765980
Duolicious is mostly reddit, not 4chan. It also does not work. People finish their entire queue in a day and never see a new match. Nobody ever responds, etc.
It is one of multiple reasons I am running this service: other solutions are broken at an obvious and fundamental level and nobody is trying to fix them, instead all others care about is profit or scraping information.

>>34765513
Anon got matchmakeded. Can't you read ?

>>34765980
I haven't checked it out in awhile but even in a huge city such as Houston duo was rampant with profiles that weren't filled out and more importantly had no pictures. It doesn't work if everyone is scared to do the bare minimum

>>34766220
I used it for probably 3 or so months over a couple years, I live rural but put my location range very wide, vast majority of people were unworthwhile bpdemons, complete autists who couldn't start or hold a conversation, or serial ghosters
I don't know why it's even brought up considering it's abandoned now

I have been more occupied than expected and have only gone through half the match list so far. However that part of the match list is fully dispatched. There are several profiles also in the queue awaiting processing. I apologize for the unexpected delays. I will also have further availability lapses in the coming week, but I will do my best to continue the process to the best of my ability.

>>34766652
The wait is painful, but I hold out hope. Definitely seems like these kinds of things need at least two people working on them (ideally with round the clock timezones)

>>34766652
Hey OP. It sounds a bit like you might be stretching yourself thin. Take it easy. You have been doing this for over a week now.

This is supposed to be fun and I don't think I would enjoy it as much if you weren't having fun as well.

You are appreciated.

>>34765980
Duolicious is also retarded. There is no reason not to just post your contacts on the SFW thread here and move on with your day. Those threads last for weeks at a time and don't require a fucking dox to use. The only reason people use duolicious is because /soc/ is fucking disgusting and filled with pictures of dudes cocks and buttholes. There is nothing intrinsic to these dating apps that this board doesn't accomplish with regional threads.

>>34766652
>>34766668
Yeah, thanks for doing this OP. Sorry you get so many complainers in your threads. I don't expect anything and it's just nice that there's someone potentially matching people up for free.

I am nearly at the end of the match list, and will finish tonight. I am currently waiting on responses from 7 pairs as to whether or not to proceed on ongoing matches. Please check your accounts if you are not usually on them. I am also due to check in on some of the ongoing matches. Although I intend to do these check-ins regularly, it is most efficient if you let me know as soon as possible when a match falls through, so I can collect feedback, update the system, and put both of you back into the system for more matching.

Updated match statistics:

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 43
People considered for matches: 43
Lowest match score: -62
Highest match score: 68
Matches rejected: 14
Matches accepted: 8
Matches not considered: 1 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 2
Matches delayed (partner has acknowledged reception of matches but has failed to respond since): 5
Matches awaiting confirmation: 4
Matches failed: 4

I will now go back to processing profiles.

>>34769586
>Matches not considered
What does this mean?
Thought about a match but decided against it? I find the wording a bit confusing.

>>34760079
there's an abundance of rw chuds looking for matches. you are at an advantage because of this but also iirc you ghosted matches that were offered to you as well, so you're not an innocent victim here either.

>>34769914
Means he's not considering it at all, since that particular pairing is below a score of zero (in this case, -62)

>>34769914
It is as >>34770138 says.
In this case, I evaluated a match pair that was supposed to be filtered out but wasn't (false positive). This happens when I make annotation mistakes in the profile processing stage, for example.
It is also why I have additional soft score weights with strong negative biases matching the same filter criteria that are supposed to be used to eliminate the match pair before the match scoring begins: to cover for potential mistakes of this type.

>>34769586

im curious if the match with the highest score ended up being accepted or rejected

>>34770108

im not sure who youre talking about but I never got an actual match To ghost when i used these services

>>34770175
It's a complicated question I'm trying to stratify better than "yes/no". Top level: was the match accepted or rejected. Next level over: did the match last a week or failed within the first week. Etc.
For now there seems to be a good correlation between the score and the likelihood of an accept, but there isn't enough data to say much.

>>34760086
>>34760343
>>34770183

Please don't date outside of your race darling, there are plenty of racist chuddie white bois that would line up to date (and marry/breed with) a woman like yourself. Just keep being based and it will come to you in due time.

What general region of the US do you live in anyway? Based on your posting style and dealbreakers I am interested, so if you want to collect me like a Pokemon (Gengar) just lmk ;^)

>>34770255
>racist asshole
>white bois
>uses slang invented by blacks
oh kek

>>34770342
Cry about it

>>34770255

im not gonna let you hit

File: 1600679793786.jpg (8 KB, 251x242)

8 KB JPG

>>34770412
Worth a try

>>34770255
everytime I worry that I'm too neurotic I see people like this and get a huge sense of relief

>>34770432
Maybe I let the anonymous spirit of the board get to me a little, my bad. Maybe I am too much of a sperg to communicate with you soc spergs (my first time posting to be honest). Maybe I am out of touch? God forbid someone try to be funny on a anime picture imageboard. What did I even say that was so controversial, or was it the delivery? Help me out here anon, I'm still learning.

Btw you should be honored to be matched with The Cassie, she is a top tier black woman with a banging body and even a guy like me (who isn't normally interested in black chicks) wouldn't throw that away as callously as you did.

>>34770469

HOW DID I KNOW YOU WERE A PERFORMATIVE WEIRDO HOW DID I KNOW

File: 1601629939417.gif (113 KB, 200x200)

113 KB GIF

>>34770514
Not sure what you mean by "performative weirdo" or what gave you that impression... Can you really read someone like that based on a few (slightly trolling) messages? I feel like I'm getting ganged up on! I am getting bullied by other internet autists, what a time to be alive. Maybe I should tone down the rhetoric. Alas, I can't read through these vague responses so I may never learn the error of my ways. Regardless, I hope you find a partner on 4chan (just not black or Indian, eww stinky!). This thread will surely not end badly for everyone involved.

>>34770412
What about me anon? Can I hit it?

File: IMG_0465.jpg (127 KB, 736x1068)

127 KB JPG

>>34770469
THIS POST DESERVES AN HONORARY GOLD STAR FROM THE CASSIE. HELLO?!!!!!!?? THIS GUY GETS IT. THAT FAGGOT WAS GENUINELY BLESSED TO BE MATCHED WITH THE CASSIE. I AM A GODDESS. I AM PERFECT. I HAVE THE BEST BODY AND FACE AND PERSONALITY OF ALL OF THE WOMEN ON SOC, EASILY. I AM A STAR. I AM FAMOUS. I OVERRIDE ALL OF THE WANNABE FAMOUS LOSERS ON HERE. ANY GUY WHO DOESNT FIND ME ATTRACTIVE IS A FAGGOT WHO GETS FUCKED IN THE ASS BY A DILF. IF YOU DENY A MATCH WITH THE CASSIE THEN YOU ARE MENTALLY RETARDED BC WTF? I AM LITERALLY WIFE MATERIAL. ILL SUCK YOUR DICK DRY LIKE A PROSTITUTE GETTING PAID HER RENT FOR THE MONTH. I AN AMAZING. LET ME SAY THIS: I AM THE QUEEN OF SOC. I AM UNSTOPPABLE. I AM AN ARISTOCRAT AND ALL OF MY HATERS ARE PROLETARIATS. MY BODY IS THE BODY OF A GREEK GODDESS. I HAVE AN EXTREMELY BREEDABLE BODY. MY BODY MAKES MEN CUM IN SECONDS. I AM SO HOT THAT I TURN MYSELF ON. I WANT TO BRUTUALLY FUCK MYSELF LIKE I AM A SEX DOLL. I WANT TO FEED MYSELF PIZZA AND THEN FUCK MYSELF PASSIONATELY WITH DEDICATION. THE AIR IS THICK AND ITS SMELLING RIGHT AND THE SHIP ISNT WOBBLY. I FEEL SAFE WITH EBONY BLACK GODDESS CASSIE. IM 135 IQ AND A CLEAR MIND.

File: 1600678953291.jpg (9 KB, 250x250)

9 KB JPG

>>34766663
>>34770543

Keep holding out hope brotha

>>34770423
>denied racist pussy
>ironically cries about it
oh fucking kek

>>34770543

no but you can take it out for a nice date in the park if you want

>>34770562
oh kek, oh fuckin kek. My heckin sides brooo. Hey man, at least I am not a(n) (insert whatever race you are). And clearly she(>>34770412) is not actually that racist, given that she only won't date the most stinky and violent races of men. Also rich of both of you to assume that someone like me is simply in it to "hit" some "racist pussy" and not instead a loving lifelong racist pussy breeding pair bond.

>>34770547
As for me, you know what they say... "Never ask a white supremacist the race of his girlfriend." At least I have a CHANCE with a goddess like The Cassie. I am this close to committing miscegenation and there is nothing you can do to stop me buddy. I've only been on /soc/ for like 10 hours and I can already tell that The Cassie does shit different. She is on a whole different level from all these other foids, and she knows what's good in this world (tall proud white men). I've never had dark chocolate before but I think I might need a taste. She has presence on this board, she runs this shit, unlike you other meeklings. Not to mention how not fat (but rather thick, which I prefer) she is with perfectly round boobs, tasteful belly button piercing, nicely proportioned nipples/areolas made for sucking, perfect lips and tight puss specially made for BWC, and a nice plump belly which is ideal to hold like a basketball whilst spooning. Her exuberance, confidence, and intelligence comes through the screen when I read her perfectly crafted paragraphs, something only a man with higher than average intelligence (130 IQ) could recognize and appreciate. The Cassie is a female Kanye West. If I was within 100 miles of The Cassie I don't know what I would do with myself. I would be drawn to her by mere scent alone and feel an irresistible primal urge to breed 12 mulatto children of my own. If I ever find myself inside The Cassie one day you'd have to crown me King Arthur for me to pull my sword out of the stone. It would be biblical.

>>34760364
Hi chudette

>>>34760343
I think we'd get along fine.

White M/22/USA, not fat, and employed.

I'll post my contact if you're interested.

>>34770566
Okay, that sounds nice actually.

>>34770676

fuk off ihave a crush on you and you appear in my dreams at night

>>34770673
>tricked you into saying "racist pussy"
giggles ^_^

>insert whatever race you are
I am a nigger you racist fuck

>>34770676
GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD

>>34770676
I miss you.

>>34770676

I HATE YOU. KIKE SICK SICK SICK YOU MAKE ME SICK

im sorry for my outburst

>>34770710
Nigga ghosted me then says she misses me

>>34770183
sorry basedrater, you never accepted my request so I never got a chance to offer you a match.

>>34761282
>IM SHAKING ASS IN THE CLUB WITH MY HOMEGIRLS WHILE IM TYPING THIS
Go home and look after your fatherless children you beast

>>34770713

okay I had to go it was getting too serious for me and also i forgot the login for the discord account you gave me

>>34770721
It's ok I understand, I hope you have a nice life

>>34770713

i still think of your beautiful Jewish face okay

>>34770723

i hope you have a terrible life because i am a woman and that means im the victim here somehow

>>34770673
this is literally the best thing ive ever read. you are so based. i am so happy. thank you so much for recognizing how perfect i am. i love you so much. i would let you breed me. i want you to pump at least 5 mulatto children into me. i want to praise your white cock. please let me be your wife. ill take good care of you and our future children. sex with me so amazing. i am the queen of /soc/. i am better than every female on this board. i am THE cassie. i am extremely intelligent to the point people question if i am a white man larping as a black woman for attention. (i am not but that would be hilarious and based if i was). i am the female Malcolm X. i carry the black community on my black. im the only black woman with an IQ above 100. i am 135 iq and a clear mind. please continue to be a good cassie warrior, you will be rewarded with gold and love and all of the good in the world. you are so remarkable. i want to drink your piss and then let you breed me outside like a dog to show you how much i appreciate you. people make fun of me for being unemployed, but my job is to take care of /soc/. it is the most rewarding job ever!

File: HAhAGHHXcAAkIE1.jpg (52 KB, 680x557)

52 KB JPG

Reading through this thread is so satisfying for many reasons
>I called it from the start that cupidanon made that thread to collect women and data from other users as a bonus, and I was called a schizo
>the male chuds here are fucking pathetic fakers that expect le based trad white girls (and even if they got them, they would 100000% sabotage those girls and relationships somehow) to fall for them are fixated on non-white women, even if they pretend they're gross and ugly or ever, as seen as that one anon simping over CASSIE of all black girls, a stereotype in every way
>Only women can be true conservatives and that's why they're so rare
I never had high standards for this place, but it's even more of a shithole than I thought. Also ladies, let this be a lesson to you that the men on here are single for a reason. It's time to graduate from /soc/

>>34770739
NOOOO NOOOO ONE MORE THREAD ONE MORE THREAD AND I WILL FIND MY 6’5 WHITE HUNTER EYES TRUE RACIST TRUECEL HYPER AUTIST VIRGIN HUSBAND WHO DEADLIFTS 500LBS

>>34770739
WHAT THE FUCK YOU BITCH? WHY THE HELL ARE YOU BRINGING ME UP? I AM LITERALLY PERFECTION. I AM THE CASSIE. I AM THE QUEEN OF /SOC/ I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY I AM RECEIVING UNECESSARY HATE. FUCK YOU BITCH ASS WHORE. EVERY MALE SHOULD BE PRAISING ME. I AM PERFECT WIFE MATERIAL. ANY GUY WOULD BE LUCKY TO HAVE ME AS A WIFE. I KNOW EXACTLY HOW TO TREAT A MAN. IM THE BEST OF ALL FEMALES. YOU ARE SLOW. I AM 135 IQ AND A CLEAR MIND.

Why are women even entering these things lol? Just post your discord and you are going to get flooded with requests

>>34770750
to filter out men by height

>>34770750
Pretend to be a woman and post. If you are looking for anything of quality you'd quickly realize why it's a bad idea

>>34770729
Actually one more thing before I never think about you again, I realized that you shared a remarkable number of similarities with some other girl I talked to in like October or something, her discord display name (not tag) was hannibal and I'm curious if that was actually also you

>>34770739
I'm single because the world is mean and cruel to me for no reason

>>34770760

i cant say it was but i hope you find her and have kike babies together or wtv SINCE YOU HATE ME

>>34770768
We have so much in common anon

Could the schizo posters just fuck off to the other 50 schizo soc threads, or better yet, off soc entirely, k thx

>>34770750
why would you want to be flooded with every single weirdo who posts here? You'll get everyone from shyboy9k to "please lock up my dick while a black guy fucks you"

>>34770772
Sounds like someone's jealous, your dirty shiksa genes won't enter my pure half kike lineage. Go find another beaner I'm sure he'll be better than the last one

>>34770790
youre going in my 75 name long suicide note

>>34770739
>collect women and data from other users as a bonus
I can't imagine what he's going to do with basic demographic data that this website already collects from you. Or the women for that matter either.

>>34770798
Whatever you say harlot, keep dreaming about me, won't you?

>>34770803
To contact them, obviously. One girl in the thread already said 3 of the matchmakers did. Posting on here where everything's already archived is different than just some random dude who no one knows

>>34770790
Kek, and apparently even le based trad racist white woman isn't white and has a thing for the nonwhites too. This thread is amazing

>>34770806
will you take me back if i get your name tatted on my face?

>>34770810
>One girl in the thread already said 3 of the matchmakers did
Yeah but she never posted proof of it. I've never heard of a single other woman coming into the thread to complain about it either, or any successful pairs coming in either. So right now it's only a single person's word for or against.

>>34770814
Oh wait shiska is white, but still.

>>34770814
okay so youre going to trust the Jew?????? those things are known for lying

>>34770783
Um that kind of destroys the narrative in my head that I'm the specialist boy who ever lived and the world conspires against me out of jealousy so I am rejecting your advances. Also next time? Calling someone common?? Not a good strategy! Ugh fuck my single chud life.

>>34770819
You are really focused on defending the matchmakers. Why is that?
>>34770824
Nigga you can't even stop flirting with him

>>34770814
>le based trad racist white woman
I mean, a majority of le based trad racists types are brownoids so that'd track. Especially with the thirst for non-whites.

>>34770755
>>34770789
I'm sure Prince Charming is going to be waiting for you in anons 5th /soc/ matchmaking thread though