Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 173
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 157
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 11
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 3

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 64
People considered for matches: 64
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 68
Matches rejected: 19
Matches accepted: 15
Matches not considered: 3 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3
Matches still going strong: 4

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted, and an unknown number (estimated at around two dozens) that have added me and never answered the questionnaire.

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: 1/7 men in the pool are either OK or actively looking for a transsexual partner.
Furthermore, 1/12 men in the cohort are bi or pansexual. There are, however, very few homosexuals of either sex, and virtually all women are exclusively straight.

>>34815505
"of which have answered" should be 162 and not 157, which was the old figure. Rest is actual.

Well damn. Now I know why you didn'y participate in the anonmade thread, m9k you've been busy!!

>>34815505
So when do you plan on doing another matching round?

>>34815713
I will do another round tomorrow evening. I had originally planned to do it yesterday, but as very few people came in between the previous round and now, likely on account of a lack of thread, I have elected to delay the round a bit. I will perform it tomorrow even if, for example, nobody else joins the round though.

>>34815505
>M:F ratio: 7:1
Which are MtF trannies counted as here?

>>34815769
Oh shit that ratio includes trannies? Oh fuck that's fucked

>>34815505
>Interesting fact
1/7 men are straight up fags and 1/12 are faggots that swear they're not fags (but they really are just homosexual). ivr said this before, and ill say it again and again: if you like to put penis into your mouth and or butthole, you are gay. there is no such thing as a "bi sexual" male, only straight and homosexual. same thing applies to (biological) women (trannies fall under homosexual male catagory).