Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 173
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 157
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 11
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 3

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 64
People considered for matches: 64
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 68
Matches rejected: 19
Matches accepted: 15
Matches not considered: 3 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3
Matches still going strong: 4

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted, and an unknown number (estimated at around two dozens) that have added me and never answered the questionnaire.

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: 1/7 men in the pool are either OK or actively looking for a transsexual partner.
Furthermore, 1/12 men in the cohort are bi or pansexual. There are, however, very few homosexuals of either sex, and virtually all women are exclusively straight.

>>34815505
"of which have answered" should be 162 and not 157, which was the old figure. Rest is actual.

Well damn. Now I know why you didn'y participate in the anonmade thread, m9k you've been busy!!

>>34815505
So when do you plan on doing another matching round?

>>34815713
I will do another round tomorrow evening. I had originally planned to do it yesterday, but as very few people came in between the previous round and now, likely on account of a lack of thread, I have elected to delay the round a bit. I will perform it tomorrow even if, for example, nobody else joins the round though.

>>34815505
>M:F ratio: 7:1
Which are MtF trannies counted as here?

>>34815769
Oh shit that ratio includes trannies? Oh fuck that's fucked

>>34815505
>Interesting fact
1/7 men are straight up fags and 1/12 are faggots that swear they're not fags (but they really are just homosexual). ivr said this before, and ill say it again and again: if you like to put penis into your mouth and or butthole, you are gay. there is no such thing as a "bi sexual" male, only straight and homosexual. same thing applies to (biological) women (trannies fall under homosexual male catagory).

>>34816402
Prision gay you uncouth swine. They want women but will settle for less.

Quick PSA: please stop claiming to be slightly chubby when you have a BMI of 46.7. For the record, Arnie at his peak had a BMI of 30.2. You are not Arnie. BMI does in fact accurately apply to you. You will get the highest quality matches if you are accurate and outward about anything that could be a problem: this means you will be matched with people who won't waste your and their time for days or weeks before one of you reveals a dealbreaker and everything falls apart.
Also note that you will be soft-banned if you "deliberately" lie about your characteristics. If you give me your weight and height, I will correct your assumptions about your body type and there is no ban risk. But if I match you with someone and that person reveals to me that you had been lying in such a way that a dealbreaker could not be identified in advance, you will be deprioritized.

>>34817322
Should people who have submitted the old questionnaire adjust their info for the V2? If not but in case anything like that is required would you be sending a general copy+paste message or would you give a heads-up ITT?

>>34817418
No need, the main purpose of the v2 questionnaire is to make data entry more efficient (except for the addition of the sexual expectations question). I am still evaluating if that question is redundant with personality questions or not. If it turns out to be different and a good predictor of match success, I will ask in these threads that people who have answered a previous version also answer directed questions that I can use to upgrade their profiles. In the meantime, there should be no issue.

>>34817322
Hambeast frauds btfo

How many of the, supposed, women are 25+, resides in the US, and Catholic? Because your blog posts hint at this thing being a time waste

>>34817742
Of course this is a time waste
1:7 F:M right now means that there are more likely 98% males 1% trans that want to feel like girl and the rest are trolling

"Matching" can only really work if there are enough people and datasets with both genders participating equally and a way to block trolls
None of those are given.
This is nothing more than a bad US Gaydar

>>34815505
grim stuff. submitted to make the m/f ratio worse

>>34817322
How many fatties and uggos are in the pool?

>>34817978
Uggos are probably too well hidden to make a good judgement call about, unless Matcher starts forcing face verification. But there's probably a good amount of fatties.

>>34817755
>1:7 F:M right now means that there are more likely 98% males 1% trans
Phenomenal math skills you got there

>>34818256
kek

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 182
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 171
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 11
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 1
Hard-banned profiles: 3

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 67
People considered for matches: 67
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 68
Matches rejected: 19
Matches accepted: 15
Matches not considered: 3 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3
Matches still going strong: 4

>>34817978
About half of the cohort is chubby or fat (but not very or morbidly obese). The vast majority are above average in looks.

>>34818454
>About half are overweight
Damn, time to get more serious about losing weight then.

>>34815490
>>34818454
Why not put us all in a discord server so we can directly talk to each other ?

>>34818589
I have thought about this option either as a secondary channel or as a main channel (using threads as secondary).
However, I think the current format allows for more privacy especially as data is exchanged. This reduces the likelihood of a malicious match dumping info on the server for everyone to see, for example.
Additionally, this gives me more visibility in the process, which has pros and cons. Pros are that I can tune the process based on the data and improve it over time, so the match success rate should increase as time progresses. The cons is that it requires significantly more involvement, of course.

Also, another PSA: if you no longer want to be part of the match pool, you can request to be retracted. Please do not add me, answer the questionnaire, and then unadd or block me. Doing so will result in a hard ban (whereas a retraction has no penalty).
I would like to understand the behavior of the people who have added me, answered, and immediately disappeared or asked to retract. Some of you have found partners through other channels: congratulations. As for the others, could you share if that was also the case? Most of these kinds of retractions happened within 3 days of the profile being processed, often less.

>>34818454
>The vast majority are above average in looks.
kek

>>34818612
>As for the others, could you share if that was also the case?
Personally, I felt like the odds of getting a match were slim to none and I decided it was not worth it to stay in the match pool.

>>34818454
>above average looks

I'm above average fitness (not like that takes much effort), but I never sent you a pic. Is that an issue?

>>34818689
No need to send any documents in advance. Validation happens at the behest of potential matches. When matches are available, both parties get the option to match, pass or ask followup questions to decide. Among the questions, either party may request some information to be validated. This is where pics, voice, and other such documents come into the picture. After that, I tag your profile with which features have been validated and by which method (but the documents used for validation are never saved or shared).

>>34818697
I'll validate through a voice call if I get a match.

>>34818668
Thanks for your answer.
I will repeat publicly what I recommend in this case: so long as you are in the pool, your chances of a match are non-0, no matter how slim based on your profile. You also don't have the visibility I have in the pool to determine how likely you would be to match. Therefore, it is more beneficial to stay in the pool but not count on a match, than to retract yourself from the pool (which guarantee 0 matches through this service).
After that, the decision is always up to the users. I process retractions for any reason (or no reason), my question itt was to try to figure out if something could be improved.

>>34818646
>m9k is a gay architect
This man gets a little more based with every update.

>>34818454
>Most common location: US
How many euros? Can you give as a number?

>>34817742
I am but I only got two matches and only one responded and then fizzled out fast. Matcher can’t screen for chemistry unfortunately.
Discord?

>>34817742
>resides in the US, and Catholic
ICE deported them all. Sorry

>>34820854
Woah woah woah, there’s a lot of us who are white, right wing recent converts who have accepted the one true Church

>>34821828
You've become orthodox?

File: 20260218_183205.jpg (223 KB, 1080x1142)

223 KB JPG

I gotta be the only applicant to these things that's ever from or anywhere close to Luxembourg.. It's something you get used to, though

>>34818589
I’m technologically illiterate but someone who knows how to make a public discord with bots + rules, please make an unofficial m9k fan club singles discord

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 187
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 177
...of which haven't answered yet: 6
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 12
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 3

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 66
People considered for matches: 66
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 68
Matches rejected: 19
Matches accepted: 15
Matches not considered: 3 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3. Matches failed in more than 2 weeks but less than 1 month: 1.

A new matchmaking round is planned for tomorrow.

>>34823067
It has to be expected with such a small applicant pool for such a small country. Your requirements are not so strict as to block you on the level of location, though, and there are a few people nearby Luxembourg. However, your age has made matching a little tricky (you're too old for the young ones, but too young for the older ones). That said, you almost got a match in the previous round (there was a dealbreaking issue that was on the cuff though).

>>34820450
Between 1/4 and 1/5 of the cohort are in Europe, ex-UK.

>>34823719
>Between 1/4 and 1/5 of the cohort are in Europe, ex-UK.
lol why did you exclude the UKians

>>34823804
With UK included, a bit less than 1/3 of the cohort are in Europe.

File: 1735856256948x.png (623 KB, 680x1069)

623 KB PNG

>Catholics still think they're the most traditional religious sect with half of their holy order being open pedophilic homosexuals and the other half protecting said open pedophilic homosexuals
>also commiting more heresies than the most progressive Protestant churches
never change, christcucks, never change
also
>people looking for and expecting attractive partners on 4chan
no words but picrel. actually can barely comprehend how stupid you have to be. probably the same people who are unironically catholic.

>>34824251
>people looking for and expecting attractive partners on 4chan
meh ugly to you is attractive to me so... whatever

>>34824251
I am attractive, just a sperg.
I am aiming for someone in the bittersweet spot that's spergy enough to end up in 4chan but not enough to be utterly disfunctional.
Basically a unicorn, yes I know.

>>34824904
Are you a female sperg?

>>34824920
Nonexistent concept, cease your searching

>>34824251
>>people looking for and expecting attractive partners on 4chan
Lots of people here arent ugly, just asocial or very shy

>>34824920
Of course I'm not.

Quick update: there are now 195 profiles in the pool, with 2 new retractions. I will proceed to a matchmaking round later and post statistics appropriately.

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 195
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 185
...of which haven't answered yet: 6
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 14
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Most undesirable vice: 1. use of hard drugs, 2. use of any drugs, 3. smoking.
Most undesirable appearance characteristics: 1. fat 2. black 3. tattoos
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 3

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 69
People considered for matches: 68
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 68
Matches rejected: 19
Matches accepted: 15
Matches not considered: 3 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 2
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3. Matches failed in more than 2 weeks but less than 1 month: 1.

Matchmaking has started, but it will take a bit more time to complete and to execute.

>>34827135
What percentage of females are mtf?

File: 1000021773.jpg (26 KB, 360x794)

26 KB JPG

>>34827135
>tfw fat and black
It's over for nigcels

>>34827135
>Most undesirable appearance characteristics: 2. black
Ah fuck me, see I knew it was because I'm black.

>>34827135
>Half the applicants are fat
>Most undesirable appearance characteristic is fat
lol
lmao

>>34827847
A lot of these fucking people are single for a reason

>>34827847
>Most common location: US
Also,
>Matches failed: 9
Hiw many of those do you think were women that got the 'ick' vs men goin '2/10 elbows too pointy'?

Place your bets, Anons.

>>34828292
There is only one case where the man had trouble with the woman's appearance as far as recorded, but that was because I interpreted a statement as a preference when it was in fact a dealbreaker. In all other cases, it is about even on who stops the conversation on account of lack of chemistry. Usually it's because the two simply aren't a good match, so they have trouble keeping conversations going. It is the correct decision to try for a few days and then stop if it doesn't work in these cases, regardless of who decides to stop the exchange. Otherwise, there were 2 cases of failed matches due to mental issues. These profiles have only been annotated to that effect, and the issues in question will be communicated to further matches.

Matches:
There are now 88 matches past the filter, involving 78 unique persons. I have about 1/3 more people to clear at the filter phase. After that I will be able to perform scoring, and finally execute on matches.
This round is taking far longer than anticipated because of a large increase in potential matches per person in the pool, i.e. we are getting to a point where more regular matches can be identified.
I will have to start working on automation before I will be able to perform the next round and will have to adjust profile processing schedules to make room for this.
There are currently 3 people waiting to be processed.

>>34828658
>I will have to start working on automation
Time to call in a favor from your buddy, ChatGPT.

Another PSA: if you would like to be removed from the matchmaking service, please let me know. If I do not receive word from you, you will be part of the matchmaking pool and I will be spending a lot of time and effort on matching you for no reason. You will, of course, be banned as a result.
So far, there have been 3 profiles that received match options only for me to discover they have unadded me within a few days of having provided their profile details.

>>34828658
So what does this mean in the long run, shorter and more scoring/matching periods now that you're introducing some automation into the system along with a larger pool in general?

>>34829771
It means matchmaking should not take more than an hour, whereas right now it has taken over a day. I'm almost done, about 90% are processed and executed, but will have to finish tomorrow for example.

As more automation is built up, only the core functions that must be handled by a human can take up my time, which means being able to handle significantly larger pools of applicants in the same time budget.

are matches sent out as they're executed or when the matchmaking round is over?
i assume former right...?

>>34830007
Are you still accepting friend requests? I sent a request a few days ago but it hasn't been accepted.

>>34830155
Typically the former.
>>34830636
I freeze friend invite adds while matchmaking rounds are in progress, because the volume of messages I tend to receive these days means I unfortunately lose track of whom I'm processing or which matches aren't done executing if I mix and match these activities. I will resume profile processing today after matchmaking is done.

Some stray matches waiting for confirmation from followups are still queued, but for all intents and purposes the matchmaking round is over. I am switching back to processing profiles.

>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 195
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 185
...of which haven't answered yet: 6
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 16
M:F ratio: 7:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Most undesirable vice: 1. use of hard drugs, 2. use of any drugs, 3. smoking.
Most undesirable appearance characteristics: 1. fat 2. black 3. tattoos
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 4

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 83
People considered for matches: 77
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 70
Matches rejected: 29
Matches accepted: 21
Matches not considered: 4 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 6
Matches awaiting confirmation: 14
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3. Matches failed in more than 2 weeks but less than 1 month: 1.

>>34817422
>(except for the addition of the sexual expectations question). I am still evaluating if that question is redundant with personality questions or not.
I've thought about this one a bit, and I don't think it's gonna be really relevant with how this is set up. Since it's likely not something that will come up until later in the relationship, probably a few months ahead, and by that point the two are likely a comfortable match and can work things out on their own.

>>34831847
I am divided on the issue. On the contrary, this can solve the issue of people getting to know each other for weeks and months only to find out they are too incompatible to satisfy each other in the bedroom. Is this a dealbreaker? Is it not? Many people know this is a problem (especially e.g. 2 doms or 2 subs).
Moreover, this question could reveal a facet of personality not entailed by other questions, and thus correlate with the likelihood of compatible first contact.

At any rate, I am currently not using the answers from this question. The goal is to check match data later and adjust the match function and determine then whether this question should also be used.

Do you keep match scores on every profile? I'm curious what my highest and lowest match score is with all the profiles. What other information do you keep on people?

>>34832269
Match scores are computed on pairs of profiles and are computed based on a match compatibility "feature vector" that involves the answers from both people in a given match.

Hey OP, just out of curiosity, feel free to not respond: do you have a gf/wife, and if so, how did you meet her?

>>34831405
for 21 matches accepted, i expected to see more replies in the thread talking about it

>>34832957
Happy people don't tend to report back because why should they? Even reviews online are more often than not people who had a not good experience.

>>34832993
That's basic psychology really. Have a good meal and friendly service? That's just what a restaurant is supposed to be. Have awful food that gave you food poisoning and rude servers? Instant 1 star review on Google listing every detail of your poor experience.

File: 03efef05ad68f6dd3259fa78a(...).jpg (1.38 MB, 4096x2924)

1.38 MB JPG

Is there some plan for a semi-automated match report for each of the participants at the end of each round? Especially for those who didn't get matches, would be interesting to know about things like near-misses (match existed but too far, age preference mismatch, etc)

Why hasn't anyone usurped OP and started a server? He isn't doing anything aside from getting off on excel "data"

>>34834342
He got me a match a couple days ago. Granted the woman was a walking red flag and declined, but I did get a match.

>>34834421
>red flag
How so?

>>34834714
>18 years old
>Wants to be "coddled"
>Wants to move in with her match nearly immediately
That just feels like it's going to blow up at any second.

>>34834738
yes it sounds awesome

>>34834738
I think the only red flag is wanting to move in immediately but I'm mentally ill.

File: ltg stare.gif (2.78 MB, 498x281)

2.78 MB GIF

>>34834738

>>34834342
What do you need a server for? So the 2 mentally ill e-girls can dominate the entire thing while 50 weirdo simps all try and dance like a jester for a crumb of their attention? There's a million of those already.
The point of this is the anonymity, and not being spammed by 50 losers who can't even spend 2 minutes reading your post before spamming your contact info asking for feet pics.

>>34834765
The last two are the big ones and would be fine on their own, but all three mixed together is absolutely a volatile combination.

>>34834738
Fuck... that's the perfect match for me. Too bad I didn't get matched with a girl like her cause I'm black and they don't want niggers.

>>34831405
That gender ratio is dire

>>34834971
It's always gonna be bad, being limited to a single board like this; to say nothing of potential lurking women being thrown off by various horror stories and posters in this thread.

>>34834785
This summarizes the overall premise behind the design of my application process pretty well.

>>34834738
Please avoid revealing information about the matches you have received in these threads. I editorialize the blurbs I provide to matches to avoid major issues, but out of respect for everyone involved, I encourage you to think about the kind of information you will share publicly.

This of course does not apply to any message exchange between me and you that does not involve a 3rd party: feel free to post these if you think they may be of public interest.

--
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 206
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 4
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 191
...of which to be processed: 5
...of which haven't answered yet: 6
...of which incomplete: 4
...of which retracted: 17
M:F ratio: 8:1
Age range of cohort: 18-45
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 4

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 83
People considered for matches: 77
Lowest match score: -117
Highest match score: 70
Matches rejected: 32
Matches accepted: 21
Matches not considered: 4 (due to low score)
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 6
Matches awaiting confirmation: 11
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 5
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 3. Matches failed in more than 2 weeks but less than 1 month: 1.

We have achieved a new milestone, with over 200 profiles now looking for matches!

>>34835002
>Please avoid revealing information about the matches you have received in these threads.
I'll try to be more careful about it in the future.

>>34834765
Being coddled is often code for 'be a human genie to tend to my wishes first, human wallet second, relationship partner as a distant third'.
This is enhanced by her being young.

>>34835071
That's why she's perfect for me. Why wasn't I matched with this person? This is bull doodoo.

>>34835177
Hey buddy, I think you got the wrong door. The findom meetup is two threads down.

>>34835225
You will never be matched because
>you are retarded
>you are disgusting to look at
>you are a whore
>you are autistic
All traits that wh*te m*n ignore

>>34835225
Meds now

>>34835002
Could we get a delta in these updates? To get an idea of how many new people are coming in each round, new matches being formed? Separate m/f stats would be interesting too

matchmaker hates me.. they leave me on read and don't match me with anyone... I AM A CIS GIRL WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT FROM ME

File: 1766172077830019.jpg (75 KB, 640x640)

75 KB JPG

>>34837712
>>34835225
Striking out on 7:1

>>34837712
>left on read
>Discord
what is this bizarre tourist post
what compels a tourist to do this
women are so bizarre

>>34837895
Ratio is now 8:1

>>34834785
bants with the lads. the current state is data porn at it's core. a place to shoot the shit and pass time isn't a bad thing anon

>>34835225
Imagine being a dude waiting for a match and you get fucking Cassie, lmao. Listen up you dumb bitch. Anyone visiting this board has seen your posts spammed all over the place. If they wanted you they'd contact you.

>>34837956
Anon just explained why that would suck though. Best case scenario is the place is just all the men getting together and moaning about not getting matched. I like the concept, but the prospect of attention whores puts me off the idea.

>>34837895
I'm going to be generous and assume the other girl just has very narrow location/age criteria.

File: homerbat.jpg (34 KB, 489x488)

34 KB JPG

>>34837712
You know you could just... ask? I asked why I got no matches, and the matcher was kind enough to tell me why

Due to unforeseen circumstances, I will not be able to post stats updates today. Very few profiles were processed as well. I will continue as usual tomorrow.

>>34838232
I don't want to ask because I'm scared to hear the answer

>>34838036
so some anons get overwhelmed at e-dating, well not even that; possible e-dating, so that means everything should be decided on their fragility? consider this: matches could increase when it's out in the open some of these fellas can't even stand on their own in an Internet chatroom. just on here queering around jerking off

>>34838503
Some anon is always welcome to try it out I suppose.

>>34815490
Do you have any stats on political views? How many men are right wing or far right compared to women?

>>34839656
>apolitical or centrist*
M:50% F:43%
>left
M:16% F:17%
>right
M:17% F:13%
>extreme left
M:7% F:17%
>extreme right
M:6% F:7%
>libertarian
M:4% F:3%

*centrist does not mean "in the middle", but "agrees with a mixture of ideas from both "sides"". The distinction is important. A radical centrist, for example, is someone who believes (profound) change is required at the policy level, but who does not agree with "packaged" representation as in the left/right dichotomy.
This view, as well as others, has been mostly inferred from the complete answer in this questionnaire question rather than self-labeling, but not always.

Furthermore, stances are normalized on the american idea of stances (which is sometimes the opposite labeling as is done in other countries).

Note that %s may not add up to 100 because they are rounded individually to the closest digit.

Also, note that political stance is never a dealbreaker, unless explicitly stated. Otherwise it is only a preference (it affects match scoring, not filtering).

I have finished accepting all friend requests up to this moment, and will not be accepting any more until the next matchmaking round. I will perform the following activities next:
>profile processing
>matchmaking: initial automation work
>matchmaking: execution
>statistics overview
I will resume profile processing after this. There is no fixed timeline on the above items, as automation work can take a bit of time, but I am currently at capacity with the current cohort size without these tools.

>>34839713
Any reason why there's slightly more extreme right women? Is it just because there are very few extreme right people as a whole?

>>34839832
The M:F ratio is 8:1. From this you can tell that a single woman ascribing to a view will shift the distribution far more than a single man.

>>34839779

Can I still send a friend request or will that get auto rejected until you open back up?

Also what's the odds for a hetero Australian guy in his 30s lol, this board seems like way more of a sausage fest than I remember.

Cool concept btw.

>>34839896
I don't reject friend requests, I just let them pile on. When I am ready to process more profiles, I accept all pending friend requests at once.

>>34837956
As a gay ftm I wouldn't mind this

>>34839960
>Gay
Lmao, straight with extra steps

>>34840018
>catty teenybopper moment

>>34837712
What's your age and location?

>>34815490
do you have to answer every single question to use this?

>>34840176
it's probably chickn

>>34839960
I would still fuck you only because you have a pussy.

What waste of time, you haven't done shit.

>>34815769
Are troons included in this number? Can we get a seperate number for them?

Automation work is still ongoing. Updates will follow.

>>34846521
Take your time mate we are all grateful for your work

>disc friend request to matcher still pending
It was over before it even begun

>>34845815
>troons
kek

>>34844810
oh kek

>>34849238
kek

>>34849012
matcher has been very communicative throughout the whole process. if you read his past few responses, you'll find the reason why he hasnt added you yet. out of all the matchmaking threads, this guy is doing it the best. he's thorough and scientific in his approach. just gotta be patient

ngl I'm running out of hope, lads

File: Knight Kissing a Lady in (...).jpg (628 KB, 1199x1862)

628 KB JPG

>>34854192
You can't do that.
Once upon a time I played the field a lot and I think I got farther than some people who say they did.
The truth is for every person I got I probably got rejected hundreds of times. That's just the nature of the game.
Finding a real match isn't easy - it's harder.
But the same rules apply and I think that's something people just don't get.
You're gonna get rejected a load of times before you find an actual match. That's just the nature of it all, bros.

>>34854219
I just turned 31, it's over. I don't have hundreds of dates left in me. My brain knows it's a numbers game and my odds aren't good to begin with, that it's like trying to pay off your mortgage by sitting at the roulette wheel until you double your money. At this point, even if I win, will I even win enough to get back in the black? Will it even matter? Will it even satisfy me after loss after loss after loss?

I just wish the rest of me would get with the program already. I hate that I was raised to expect this out of life, like it's a given thing everyone gets to experience. That eventually I'd have a place of my own or a family or kids. I was born to just distract myself with bullshit until I eventually die. That's my lot in life.

File: The Lookout, 1887.jpg (1.49 MB, 2045x2401)

1.49 MB JPG

>>34854248
We all were raised this way, Anon. None of our Boomer parents were actually malicious. They genuinely believed shit was working the way it was when they were kids. Believe it or not, they weren't malicious.
The trick is honestly just finding peace with and being happy with yourself.
Try to figure out what you're doing because of other people's influence on you and what you actually want to do - it's a lot harder to do than you think. Many things we think we are doing for ourselves, we're just trying to prove a point and heal past trauma.
Always remember: women are a side-quest. They're something you do when everything else is done that you are about and taken care of.
If it happens, it happens. If it doesn't, it doesn't..
That's the real last RedPill about all this.

>>34854248
My father was on the cusp of 50 when he met his current wife, who is 20 years younger than him. He is a bitter, abrasive, racist, alcoholic. He might have been a master carpenter, but he's not good with his money so he didn't even have a house for himself. If a man like that could get married and have another kid, I'm sure you'll be fine anon.

>>34854248
> I just turned 31, it's over.

No it isn't, not because you're 31 anyway. It's only over if you have nothing going for you and aren't willing to change that.

>>34854334
>The trick is honestly just finding peace with and being happy with yourself.

That's only partially true. The real goal is to work hard become the best version of yourself physically and financially. I'm in my late 30s and I made out with a girl who was more than 15 years younger than me recently, and have gotten plenty of attention from younger girls in their early 20s. You're correct though, to treat women like a side quest and look for the ones who are chasing you. Of the ones who are chasing you, decide which ones you find attractive enough to engage with.

>>34840206
Thanks Cassie

>>34854961
>look for the ones who are chasing you
>implying women chase
Kek

>>34856266
>implying women chase

Most don't. But if you're a high value man, then some will. The point is to get to a point where you're a high value man, then put yourself out there in a way that gets their attention. If a girl isn't actively trying to engage with you, move on. You're wasting your time orbiting.

The women I've been with have engaged with me and often start conversations (at least until they lose interest) and will do attractive things if you respectfully show interest in those things.

Many don't, and if not, that's fine too. Just delete them and move on. You should be high value enough to get the attention of at least some women, and also high value enough that you don't get upset if a woman isn't into you because you're content with who you are and what you've done with your life.

If you're orbiting and hoping she someday notices or appreciates you when you're not getting any signs of that, you're wasting your time. Delete her and move on.

>>34856344
See but this supposes that we live in a meritocracy, where a man providing value attracts female attention. The reality is that there are scores of fat, jobless, abusive retards who have no problem getting women. Serial killers get so many marriage proposals that it's practically a cliche at this point.

Dating is purely a numbers game, you can somewhat affect those odds if you're exceptionally tall or good-looking or you make over 6 figures, but for the vast majority of men it is just pure "right place right time" random chance.

>>34854248
I just turned 31 and it's far from over, you idiot. I started dating a few years ago and it took me a while to learn the game, but now I'm pretty good at it. OP didn't give me a single match either, even though I've met countless of women on here who wanted to marry me. Don't let one retard put you down.

>>34856732
>The reality is that there are scores of fat, jobless, abusive retards who have no problem getting women.

Yes, and yet they're still fat, jobless, abusive retards who are losers. Almost like getting women isn't the most important thing in the world because too many women lack the ability to recognize value when they see it. No man should let a woman's opinion deter them from working hard to improve their lives, because it will pay off in every other way. And there will be women, even if it's not the majority, who will be drawn to men with value. The trick is filtering out the unattractive ones with baggage, but that's not hard, just ghost them like women do to men they're not interested in.

matchmaker is dead

Sorry for the rarity of updates. I am still working on automation, which is taking significantly more time than originally planned.

File: U Sure.jpg (54 KB, 632x810)

54 KB JPG

>>34856266
They definitely do. Most dudes just never experience it.

>>34858661
Yeah I came in to check on this. Sent a request and didn't get added back yet.

File: automation-344403367.png (26 KB, 404x408)

26 KB PNG

>>34859092
classic

>>34859092
What are you automating?

>>34864431
I'm working on automating both the matchmaking itself, and the data normalization so that it can be calculated. Basically quick-list the viable matches so I can focus on double-checking and writing blurbs instead.

Bump

>>34815490
is it still active or am i too late? added on discord anyway

>>34868378
He's still going, but focusing on restructuring and streamlining the process. He won't add any new profiles to the pool until he's finished with that.

I haven’t had my request accepted yet.

>>34861061
Nice prediction
At least they're trying

>>34869936
he's been offline for a long time, (on discord) and it looks like he's busy writing a program to automate users together, so I would say just be patient (I guess)