Dime a dozen underage prototroon.
>built different
Lol, lmao.

>>34848904
Thanks for the laugh.
Now to hide the thread.

2M7BE94VE
20m
looking for fit or decently buff tall gamer cute dude for erps or send porn stuff to me I don't mind being forever friends or more than that if you are around 20yo
(Not into black or Russian, don't be super weird or creepy)

>>34848868
What state?

>>34848868
No homo but how's your crypto portfolio?

Pseudointellectualism? I love being a pseudointellectual.
All hitherto methods of analysis in the domain of the sexual have fallen short of a truly satisfactory method which utilizes the realities of evolutionary psychology to form moral judgments about sexual behavior. I know that evolutionary psychology is a pseudoscience, but in every way that it is indeed pseudoscientific, so too is evolution itself or anything that posits and intentionality or "telos" behind design. For instance, why do human beings have eyes? It is not enough to say "to see." This implies that there is some teleological end to the possession of eyes, when eyes are simply a happenstance result of evolutionary pressures which resulted in the formation, over millions or billions of years, something we call an "eye." It is not necessary that "humans" "evolved" "it" "to see," (extensive scare quotes very much desired) only that it exists and it operates in some empirical way, but there is no "reason" for its existence. Nevertheless, we can (and ought, perhaps) to make the assumption that it exists "to see." When we have finally abandoned the irrational fear of partaking in pseudoscience, then we can begin to describe reality as it is, rather than as abstract models fail to describe it.

The femboy is a phenomenon not at all unique to 21st century libertinism. Rather, it is a very natural variation on male sexuality that results from a boy experiencing an insecure, disempowering, or helpless environment in which his sexuality not only had no opportunity to find relief, but was so far from the possibility of relief that his situation came to resemble that of a slave in a primitive polygynous mating environment. Males in such an environment of constant disempowerment (a word I would like to more technically explain) experience a shift in psychology, pushing them to signal to the dominant males within society that they are not a threat, not sexually, not physically, perhaps not even intellectually.

>>34855699
There is nothing conscious about this process of total sexual surrender. To stimulate such a total destruction of one's own masculine sexuality and autonomy, it is necessary that the male truly seek this role, and to this end, the mind continuously stimulates an erethism of hopeless frustration and vulnerability. The world is very large and stressful and dangerous and confusing, and you're a total failure, a loser, and worthless; now wouldn't it be easy to accept it, get on your knees, and receive some sort of validation? It is no coincidence that this process allows a disempowered male an opportunity to ingratiate himself with the dominant sexual males within his hierarchy, and it is further no coincidence that males are born with a prostate, an organ that defies traditional accounts of sexuality.

The question for me is always whether to fuck the femboy, considering he is already sexually destroyed, or protect him and curse the unjust oppression that even he does not perceive; perhaps he is "proud" of his identity. This pride is also an interesting topic of discussion, as it is the result of an increasingly stratified sexual system socially engineering the most vulnerable males into a state of such total sexual disenfranchisement that they come to accept their own sexual emasculation as a fundamental component of their essential being. But I think this is too much pseudointellectualism for two posts.

>>34855699
>and intentionality
an* intentionality
>behind design
to design*
>formation, over
formation of,*
>we can (and ought, perhaps) to make
we can (and ought, perhaps) make*

sloppy.