>I'm a retarded fat nigger

The user didn't work, you need to go back and copy what appears on the profile, it should have some numbers at the end if it's a new profile.

>>34912375
try now

this is why you (the participants) need a server. the middleman experience isn't feasible

Not again...

>>34912063
This concept is quite amusing, has anyone actually matched? And what was the experience like?
I'd submit my answers if I didn't strongly prefer Latinas, and I have a feeling those aren't browsing here.

>>34912420
Why has nobody made a matchmaking dc server anyway?

>>34912470
oh I tried this a while ago and specified any race but indian. nigger ass op matched me with an indian and is just farming information kek. lo and behold they've never been effective.

>>34912420
>>34913643
I might make a server, depending

>>34913697
wtf thats awful fuck that guy ig lmao i'm the cooler replacement

>>34913835
die

File: 1774601532718526.jpg (53 KB, 720x720)

53 KB JPG

and now we wait...

Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 13
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 0
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 11
...of which haven't answered yet: 2
...of which incomplete: 0
...of which retracted: 0
M:F ratio: 11:2
Age range of cohort: 18-23
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 0
Hard-banned profiles: 0

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 1
People considered for matches: 2
Lowest match score: -90
Highest match score: 40
Matches rejected: 0
Matches accepted: 0
Matches not considered: 0
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 0
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 0
Matches still going strong: 0

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: Most men so far have been younger, while the women skew older

Oh boy lets try this again

Nah, I'm done with this shit. I've done all the cupid threads, and even that Matcher9000 guy. He hasn't found me a match for two months now. And now he's fucked off somewhere to jerk off to some math numbers or whatever his nerdy fucking ass wanted to do with our data. Fuck... this... shit.

File: 1774898393611297.png (2.62 MB, 1365x2048)

2.62 MB PNG

>>34919077
he got all the hot girls for himself :3

>>34919077
You know what they say anon, third time's the charm! Haha, totally not coping.

Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 24
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 0
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 17
...of which haven't answered yet: 7
...of which incomplete: 0
...of which retracted: 0
M:F ratio: 13:6
Age range of cohort: 18-35
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Bachelor's
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 0
Hard-banned profiles: 0

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 2
People considered for matches: 4
Lowest match score: -90
Highest match score: 85
Matches rejected: 1
Matches accepted: 0
Matches not considered: 0
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 0
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 0
Matches still going strong: 0

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: Most women are from the U.S. whilst most men are from Europe.

bump, more updates coming soon

Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 35
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 1
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 27
...of which haven't answered yet: 8
...of which incomplete: 0
...of which retracted: 0
M:F ratio: 2:1
Age range of cohort: 18-55
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 3
People considered for matches: 6
Lowest match score: -90
Highest match score: 85
Matches rejected: 1
Matches accepted: 2
Matches not considered: 0
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 0
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 0
Matches still going strong: 2

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: An indian scammer attempted to enter

>>34924619
>M:F ratio: 2:1
did you miss a key or something?
I'm genuinely surprised it's that close, all the other matchmaker attempts had like 10:1 ratios the whole way through

>>34924621
The main driving factor is the small number of adds currently. I wasn't expecting a large number of women either. The actual ratio is 18 men to 9 women.

Fun fact: A large minority of men are Hungarian.

>>34924619
What’s a hard or soft ban?

>>34924911
A hard ban is where I just block the person (in this case, a scammer) and a soft ban is where I don't consider them seriously but may still use their profile (in this case, two lolcows)

>>34919077
Why did the matchmaker guy just ghost anyway?

>>34924619
What was the scam?

>>34925549
I'm not sure, but he was using chatgpt for every sentence and was definitely not from where he said he was. If I had to guess, it was something relating to pictures because he kept begging for pictures.

>>34925507
No real stated reason, but he was always a busy guy and then suddenly got enough people responding to him that he wanted to "automate".

If I had to take a stab in the dark, the original matchmaker might've gotten overwhelmed and is at least taking some kind of unplanned hiatus to catch up with his personal life.

>>34925572
How’d you catch the filthy pajeet?

>>34927549
His usage of chat gpt was blindingly obvious

Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 51
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 1
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 46
...of which haven't answered yet: 4
...of which incomplete: 0
...of which retracted: 1
M:F ratio: 8:1
Age range of cohort: 18-55
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 7
People considered for matches: 14
Lowest match score: -100
Highest match score: 85
Matches rejected: 2
Matches accepted: 5
Matches not considered: 0
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 1
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 0
Matches still going strong: 4

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: Zero females have added me this Sunday, skewing the M:F ratio once again.

File: plantation boss pepe.jpg (45 KB, 529x667)

45 KB JPG

I got in too late to take advantage of this last time it was up. Excited to maybe finally get in on this.

>>34924984
Who were the lolcows? Cassie and chickn?

>>34929153
The male to female ratio is 8:1 I wouldn't get my hopes up

File: Smoking Chewbacca with Su(...).jpg (125 KB, 1360x768)

125 KB JPG

>>34929182
That's just the normal ratio on this board.
Every time we do get a real woman actually looking for a partner usually some chuds run her off. Or she eventually reveals herself to be a whore and basically self-deports.
Me? I'm optimistic. I've had good experiences with /soc/ and even the bad ones are at least exceedingly memorable.

>>34929197
You know what? I like your spirit, Anon

File: Patton Salute.jpg (36 KB, 400x320)

36 KB JPG

>>34929225
Thanks Fren. I just got added this morning and sent in my questionnaire. Best of luck to all of us!

>>34928000
>Matches considered: 7
>People considered for matches: 14
What's the real difference between these two numbers anyhow? Obviously matches considered is the number of considered pairs, but is "people considered" just the number of unique people considered for a match?

Like if A, B and C were all capable of matching each other (and are the only people in the data), would that mean there's 9 matches and 3 people considered?

>>34927992
Using ai to scam for pics, why are pajeets this way?

>>34928000
(potentially) 16 men shifted the ratio from 2:1 to 8:1??? the fuck are you talking about

>>34930437
Who gets matched and why?

>>34930472
>why are pajeets this way?
Jugaad and izzat. It's baked into their culture

>>34931640
In my example I was assuming all three people were capable of matching with each other.
So A could make with B and C, B with C and A, and C with A and B. Mostly just so I could make sense of "matches considered" vs "people considered"

Bump

File: Stained glass depiction o(...).jpg (959 KB, 2236x2060)

959 KB JPG

Dropped in to say Matchmaker is in fact working. I got a match through him today finally - wish me luck!

>>34939846
Hope it goes well for you anon.

Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 70
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 1
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 60
...of which haven't answered yet: 9
...of which incomplete: 0
...of which retracted: 2
M:F ratio: bleak
Age range of cohort: 18-55
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 1

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 12
People considered for matches: 16
Lowest match score: -100
Highest match score: 85
Matches rejected: 5
Matches accepted: 7
Matches not considered: 0
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 3
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 0
Matches still going strong: 4

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: There has only been 1 add from a female since Sunday. The situation is unfortunate for now.

>>34940063
POST IT ON CRYSTAL CAFE IMMEDIATELY

>>34917263
>M:F ratio: 11:2
lol, lmao, rofl even

these threads are a bigger scam than battlefield 6

>>34940063
>banned profiles

the fact you banned any profiles at all means you're a fucking fraud and don't actually care about matching people..

>>34940481
chickn and cassie must be gatekept

>>34940444
That's just indicative of this board. Made especially worse because every other matchmaker has either ghosted or tried using it as a pretense to collect the contact info of what few girls there are on here.

File: thumbs-up-rambo.jpg (29 KB, 620x454)

29 KB JPG

>>34940013
Pretty great so far! Assuming the thread is still up I'll check back in a few days if there's updates. Here's hoping I can drop some White-Pills for folks feeling down and out.
Always remember, Anons: rejection is a part of the game. It's not about whether you get thrown off the horse, but if you get back on it again.

>>34940481
One of the bans was an obvious scammer.

>>34940481
Someone claimed to be an 18 year old Indian male living in Texas but used ChatGPT to write all the messages and didn’t know anything about Texas.

>>34940063
>M:F ratio: bleak
That made me chuckle at least

>>34912063
>A/S/L
31 M Germanistan
>Status
Retired (Unable to work due to not conforming to the wageslave system)
I though 'work' for spreading awareness, understanding and higher consciousness
>What are you looking for
Compatible people that share my mindset without delusions. Ideally someone local to meet and interact with, although when it comes to intimate things I'm definitely
not into hairy, beards, masculines and chubbies. I'm an androgynous male that some mistake for a women or fetishize. I don't like gender roles but I submit to this
avataras biological destiny to some extend. I seek for the advanced knowledge and those that seek it too. Those that dare the transgression and are not afraid.

For physical meetups I might have a garden area that requires a lot of effort as no one helps me and my ex relationship left me with immense fiancial burden I have
been working in no-money style for years and adapted very well to it. The garden is making progress but a mere blueprint for my future, one without (human) neighbors
is certain. You can become part of this process and we see where it will lead. Just do not force interaction if you do not geuininely resonate with my wording and
seek for a superficial relation or someone to exploit.

We might play video games excessively together or if you are into gardening you could help me in my projects to gain experience on your own. Someone for no-money camping
and illegal freedom would also be nice as that is one of the things I intend to do in the future. We could spend a lot of time in the forest together, maybe get high,
do duties, hunt for mushrooms, look out for cute spiders and possibly other things.

File: 9700xc24.jpg (265 KB, 3840x2070)

265 KB JPG

>>34942801
>More about you
I'm 170 cm 66 KG (wanting to get to 55 again), long haired, very pale as I'm nocturnal, permanent NEET with infinite time but their own place in some magical forest hills
in western Europe. Don't bother for anything physical if you are not local or do not possess a valid identity to be here. I have been through all of that already. My
lifestyle is adaption to extreme poverty, if you are into money and worship the system its definitely not for you. I cannot be bought, but I'm attracted to those that
disobey and resist like I do. Interest in plants, nature and psychedelics would be ideal, as these are the main parts of my existance beside my computer systems. I have
a genuine F84.5 diagnosis that also allows me to become pensioned in such early age. I see it as a blessing not as a disability, as it allows me to see things more clearly,
but that is for you to judge yourself.
>Contact
endzeitromantik @ emailn . eu

>>34942806
>>34942801
oh great now this guy's just shitting up the thread

>>34941865
Not

>>34941865
Not true
18/m/tx disc: matchtossaway

bump for the saturday crowd

>>34940063
what the hell is a soft ban and what does one do to get soft banned

>>34946391
Soft bans are people who get bumped to the bottom of the priority list, usually through ghosting matchmaker when he has a match for them or through behavior.

bump

>>34912420
This is why you retards should stop fragmenting into smaller and smaller groups and just encourage people to get on an established site like Duolicious or Tagmap that had already got all this shit working.

We've gone from yet another fucking discord to a damn Google spreadsheet and you wonder why nobody gets a match.

>Tagmap
is that site even active?

>>34953638
I've never used either site, but they usually get brought up in threads like these and people who still use them say they're even worse than the matcher threads and you end up getting like the same dozen or so people.

bump

>>34943434
really?

>>34953638
kek

Current statistics
>Cohort statistics
Total adds: 88
...of which retracted before answering the questionnaire: 1
...of which have answered the questionnaire: 65
...of which haven't answered yet: 20
...of which incomplete: 0
...of which retracted: 2
M:F ratio: bleak
Age range of cohort: 18-55
Most common location: US
Most common education level: Highschool
Most commonly requested minimal education level: Highschool
Most desired location for a partner: US
Most undesirable political stance: Any extremes
Soft-banned profiles: 2
Hard-banned profiles: 2

>Match statistics
Matches considered: 15
People considered for matches: 18
Lowest match score: -100
Highest match score: 85
Matches rejected: 7
Matches accepted: 7
Matches not considered: 0
Matches delayed (partner already in another match): 0
Matches awaiting confirmation: 0
Matches failed in less than 1 week: 3
Matches failed in more than 1 week and less than 2 weeks: 0
Matches still going strong: 5

There are currently 0 additional adds awaiting to be accepted

I believe I have processed all questionnaires. I may have missed someone, so if you haven't received confirmation, please ping me.

Interesting fact: The recent significant slowdown in adds has begun to slow matchmaking to a crawl. Apologies for the delay.

>>34956527
So how do we know when we get matched up? My questionnaire was received but I haven't heard anything back yet

bump

>>34958627
I will notify you when someone is found

bump

bump

>>34956527
Wonder how the people who have been matched are getting along

bump, we need more applications. so far i've only gotten maybe 5 in the past week and none have been female, I strongly encourage any and all females to apply as there is a massive pool of males from all backgrounds and regions

>>34976828
think you can give a list of regions who have applied rto matchmaker so far and the count of users in each>?

>>34953638
It's active, I've had a bunch of people add me from it but those conversations go nowhere. One seemed like a really cool local I though I'd get along with but she ghosted during our first talk lmao.

>>34912063
>Desired interactions with a partner?
>Sexual expectations?
Can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by these?

>>34977632
i will work on this

>>34977729
it's stuff like, what kind of things do you want to do (i.e. outdoorsy stuff vs homebody) and if there are any specific sexual expectations (i.e. i am high libido so i want a lot of sex, or i am low libido and do not want a lot of sex, or i am super into x kink and want to do that)