its funny how deluded soccer cucks will tell you their game is the fairest, most egalitarian sport in the world, but in 100 years only 8 countries have won their world cup and in the biggest domestic competition (the EPL) only 7 teams have won it, making it one of the most unbalanced, uncompetitive national competitions in the world. they made up extra fake trophies to hide this fact (things like 'shields' that no one really cares about.) Even outside the EPL every other soccer tournament is more or less the same with maybe four competitive sides then a bunch of who gives a fuck where you have to go back to ye olde dickety-two when they were actively competitive but technically playing in a completely different competition.what all the winning teams have in common is the money backing them, its a game of 'may the best billionaire win', not an actual sport.the definition of globalized soullessness.
Soccer = globohomo
>>154840559None of this are real problems btw the real problem is all the ngubus playing for european teams
>>154840559I like how the world cup you've gone 100 years and not 25 or however many editions and then for the Prem you've decided all the English champions before 1993 don't count.
>>154840559>tell you their game is the fairest, most egalitarian sport in the worldI don’t know a single person who says that. The number of people complaining about the football business being ridiculously unfair and unbalanced however is very large.You may be retardedI am not quite sure about how the World Cup is supposed to be unfair in this regard, though. Sure, some countries are richer and some are poorer. And then some care more about the sport than others, some have better facilities. But that’s not fully comparable to modern club football
>>154840559>and in the biggest domestic competition (the EPL) only 7 teams have won it???are you really so stupid that you aren't counting pre-EPL league titles?also our league, which i'm pretty certain is the league with the highest amount of different champions in the world (or at the very least on the top 20 premier leagues) has, as of today, a grand total of 30 different champions and if you posted this yesterday it would've been 29 because we just got a new onealso, the world cup has been going on for almost 100 years but in total it's been played only 21 times, 22 this year, since it happens every 4 yearsjudging by that the WC is very competitive
>>154841260>also our leaguenobody cares about shitty farmers leagues where everyone good gets stolen from you by not just europeans but even BRAZILIANSmight as well go watch children play a sportor worse, women
jesus, england and spain only have one title apiece
>>154840559you dont watch basketball when lakers or celtics are playing then, because even with other systems players still want certain clubs
>>154841442Jesus' win was spectacular to be desu.
>>154841260The Basketbal World Cup, running since 1950 (30 years less than the FIFA World Cup) and also with an 'every four years turn around' (the standard turn around for an international sporting competition) has already had five champions. The World Baseball Classic, which has only been running for twenty years, has also had five. The Rugby World Cup, running less than 40 years, has also had five. The Cricket World Cup, running from the 70s, has had six.The FIFA world cup, running twice or even sometimes three times as long as most other global sporting competitions, with the same four year turn around, has only had 7 winners ever.
>>154841935now let's compare the amount of different world cup winners there were on its first 50 years>6 championshow curious, almost exactly the same as all of thosethe teams that establish themselves as winning teams earlier keep getting support and focus, which in turn makes them win more over time
>>154840559>only 7 teams have won itThat's still more unique world championship winners than any other international team sport except cricket which is also tied with 7 (and they count the entire West Indies as one country) but outside those seven countries it isn't even remotely competitive. Most team sports are dominated by only three or four countries and have been for all of history.
Baseball already achieved half that parity in 20 years and was inches away twice from making it three quarters.
Brazil should have won even more WCs imho.Don't care about pipo that only like to watch Football but are not willing to put their entire nations on the line
>>154842978>Baseball already achieved half that parity in 20 yearsBy completely twisting the rules of national eligibility to the point of making the whole event pointless. Every single country outside of the top ten are completely made up of mercenaries. Jazz Chisholm Jr played for Great Britain because he is from the Bahamas and his parents lived there before it got independence from Britain. Any MLB player with an Italian sounding last name got to play for Italy.
>>154843120Haramball and dictators prevent Brazil from winning
The list of English football champions is as follows:LiverpoolManchester UnitedArsenalManchester CityEvertonAston VillaSunderlandChelseaSheffield WednesdayNewcastle UnitedBlackburn RoversHuddersfield TownWolverhampton WanderersLeeds UnitedPreston North EndBurnleyPortsmouthTottenham HotspurDerby CountySheffield UnitedWest Bromwich AlbionIpswich TownNottingham ForestLeicester CityFootball didn't start in 1992, Lachlan.
>>154841680Hehehe
>>154840612This tbqh
>>154840559the best winning is the definition of fairness
>>154845468The vaunted English pyramid, praised how potentially hundreds of teams have the potential to work their way to the title, has fewer different champions than Major League Baseball despite a 15 year head start and the latter having no more than 30 teams, only 16 for about half its history.
>>154841935Is the basketball and the baseball world cups kinda like hockey, where the US and Canada never sends their best because they're busy with the playoffs?
>>154841680
>>154848834I don't think treating your league and teams like franchises is any better. Americans have a god point when they point out the disparity in power and money in football. But I'm not sure how anyone manages to root for teams like Dallas Stars or Las Vegas Raiders considering the fact that they just got moved to your cities for money-earning potential.
>>154840726this, op is a faggot as usually
>>154840559Name me a more democratic ball sport
>>154840559>soccer cucks will tell you their game is the fairest, most egalitarian sport in the worldnobody says that though??
>>154840559>(the EPL) only 7 teams have won itfuck off 1992 customer
So what's Chik*ner's deal now?
Our game is the fairest, most egalitarian sport in the world.
>>154848834Yeah but what's the format? Is it a round robin league? If not you're comparing apples with oranges.The FA Cup, the foremost competition in english football until the marketing machine got everyone's attention, has 45 different winners.
>>154840559Why would the number of different winners be something that anyone gives a fuck about? Also the Spanish league is the top league in the world, England and Italy tied for second. You would make a better point if you brought up the European Champions League where you can see all of Europe competing for the most important club title.
