The average ball in play time in tennis is 20% compared to 30% in badminton and 55% (FIFTY FIVE) in squash. I really don't get why this pussy ass sport is so big when it's not even the best racquet sport, personally I'd argue it's not even top 3 but I'd understand if you put it above pinpong.Squash covers more ground, it's more explosive, there's less rest time (tennisfags sit down every two games lmao), it requires less stamina and cardio AND more importantly it's just far better to watch. I'd bet on any top 10 women's player to completely mog whoever the male GOAT tenniser is, that's how bad it is
>it requires less stamina and cardioI meant more obviously
It's a white people thing, you wouldn't get it.
Squash developed from hitting a ball against a wall in prison yards. Tennis was created in the royal courts and lawns of Europe. To each his own. (I like both and can beat the fuck out of you at both)
>>154877720Squash is the superior racquet sport we all know this.
For me, it's racquetball
>>154878659Pleb shit
if you watch tennis just for ball in play, it's probably not your sport to begin with.
Tennis just looks way cooler than the other two, sorry
>>154877720Because its the most physically intense. Squash is exhausting but tennis will kill your muscles. The slower surface, longer distance, heavier ball make it far rougher.It also helps that it has a 400 year legacy of being the elite’s posh sport that doesn’t require horses.
Stop malding
>he reads percentages on a chart to decide if a sport is good
