Thrash ass new money club with cargo cult like fanbase.
>win trophy>proceed to shit all over your cityI don't understand their fans
>>154955621>fans
>Third worlders who hate their old colonial masters proceed to destroy everything whenever they get an opportunity due to neo liberal society and natives being goyball cucks
>>154955621They are new third world fans.Real PSG fans were white skinheads from 1970-2010. They left (rightfully) when the club was bought by arab oil money in 2011.The club new name is QSG, Qatar Saint Germain.
>>154955621It's not their city, they don't care.
>>154955621Algerians and nignogs from the banlieues aren't parisian lol they don't care about Paris or PSG, they just wante to destroy, loot and fight cops
>>154957091Okay then>win trophy>chimp out and set stuff on fire wherever you areWhen my team wins something I just have drinks with my bros and have fun, we don't feel the need to riot and cause millions in damages
>>154955621These people unironically are feral brownoids, they just want an excuse to riot. They will take anythingNot every PSG fan is like that, of course, but they are a really really high share
>>154957091It's their city, just not their country
>>154957132There's a difference.You are Spanish.Your friends are Spanish.Your favorite club is Spanish.PSG is a Qatari business in Paris with nafri customers.
>>154955467Trvke
>>154957060To add even more context, PSG first and historical stand called Boulogne was white skinned and so politically far-right, brownoids were not allowed in the stand.Another stand called Auteuil was created in opposition and was multiracial.As a result, conflicts between both stands/kops grew over the years until 2010 were Auteuil nafris killed a Boulogne fans.All fans were banned over this and Auteuil (nafris) sucked Qatar's cock to come back in the stadium.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Xx3C0OUwtk
>>154957210They own the suburbs (banlieue), not the centreprotip: do NOT take the RER B, especially at night
The Al-Nassr of European football
>>154955621they have zero empathy for what isn't them and they want to experience an adrenaline rush
>>154957339why are there nafris in france? you don't realize they will ruin everything?they again killed someone and put two in come and burned a shit ton of carsfor reference finland won the iihf world cup and there is market celebrations going on this is how you're supposed to do it in a white country, with white people having fun getting shitfaced nothing gets destroyed and certainly nobody gets killed or cars get burnedyou need to get the nafris out or you will never be able to enjoy your home anymore
>>154955621they are browns its same as BLM they just take excuse to destroy shit and be violent feral animalsa pic rel of what paris could have and should have been
>>154958664fuck the germansthey ruined it all with their shitty autism
>>154958696>boohoo, its da jerminsYou were niggerlovers before that already, and you fought for the side of niggerlovers until the very end. You can be mad at us, but start looking at yourself firstMatthew 7:1-5 comes to mind
>>154958738dumb fucking idiot, you ruined it all. europe lost all its power to the usa and the soviets because of you. what a fucking disaster.
>>154958791You were butthurt over losing Elsass, WW1 wasn't our fault and every single serious historian agrees that everyone was equally retarded. You were foaming at the mouth. And back then already, Germans knew you were niggerloversThen you all went apeshit on us and basically begged for Hitler to come to power and wreck everything. Could have just allowed Germany and Austria to unite. Or not come up with a dozen rigged referendums like the one in Eupen-Malmedy. But no, you wanted to humiliate us - and yet you idiots didn't bother checking on us? Tough shitWere the Nazis retarded? Yes. But that's not all there is to it. You'd know that if you were honest. It also has nothing to do with you guys being niggerlovers. You fought for Jews and Americans to bring you even more niggers, and to end the German idea of an ethnos as the column of the state in favor of your and America's idea of a diverse demos. Congrats. You were the ones playing a stupid game, and you won a stupid price. And typical for a Frenchman, you are unwilling to see it and instead blame it on us at all costs. I unfortunately can't say that I am surprised
>>154958791lmao blame the people that actually fought them gave millions of their men so that soviet kikes wouldn't steamroll the entirety of europe as they had planned(You) should have fought on their side, as would have UK. Had you both been on the right side of history the USA kikes couldn't have joined the war on the communist side they couldn't have sold it to the american public no matter how retarded they arethat being said, you are merely a side story in wwii, yes for france that used to be such a military power in all previous european wars it must sting but its the truth. so your decisions really didn't matter, it all ultimately rested on the traitor churchill had he not get the british propagandized on his side the world war would have not happenor rather it would have become known as the war when europe defeated communism and ushered in an era of national socialism that brought the golden age of europe of unimaginable prosperity and peaceimagine having all the productivity of your people actually used by your own people and not a penny would go to kike bankers nor to feed and house browns
>>154958913shup up, they fucking ruined the balance of power twice, every time europe lost power because of it.
>>154958929balance of power? you mean you french and anglos giving jews more power as time went on?im not saying the germans were on the right side on ww1 as they took all the help they could get they sided with the turk roaches of all peoplebut it had been over for you since the "french" revolution aka the jewish revolution against the people of franceand the british were arguably fucked from the 17th century already after cromwell brought the jews in there and allowed them to create the bank of englandnapoleon was the last frenchman that actually fought for france taking it back from the jews that instigated the revolution and were the revolutionary government, and he made the infamous decree that jews were not to lend money anymore or otherwise earn money through any practices except from their own labor, which is the reason the banker jews of europe financed the 7th coalition to topple himin a way napoleon was the hitler of his time and while its framed as if they both "attacked everyone else", its rather that the jews put everyone else to the task of attacking thembut i'm no statesman, so i'll rather quote a much smarter man than myself:
>>154959077>The Jew begins to replace the political idea of democracy with that of a dictatorship for the working class. In the organized masses who follow Marxism, the Jew finds he is holding a weapon that allows him to do without democracy and permits him instead to conquer and rule the people through the iron hand of a dictatorship.>The Jew works systematically in two directions for the revolution: economically and politically. Any nation that violently resists his internal attack is surrounded by a net of countries which fall more easily. This ring forms a network of enemies around his target and incites the nation into war, and finally, if necessary, when the troops are on the battlefield, he raises the flag of revolution, right when the country is least prepared.>Economically, the Jew shakes the State until its social services begin to sway. They become so costly that they are transferred away from national control and put under his financial control. Politically, he blocks funding and denies the State access to the resources it needs for self-presevation, he destroys the foundations of any national resistance or defense, he destroys faith in the government leadership, he ridicules the nation's history, and he drags everything that is truly great into the gutter.– Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
It's sad that people compare Manchester City to this soulless, astroturfed club. City had won a major European trophy before the French government even founded PSG.Plus, proper clubs like St Etienne and Marseille get overlooked
>>154959127City were fine until they got taken over. Depending on the perspective, you can call it better or worse. It is better because they have a respectable history that goes way back. PSG does not. But you can say it's worse because PSG never bothered to use history as a veil, they were shockingly honest about their interests. Meanwhile City got hollowed out and completely redefined. And now that history, which is completely overshadowed by the new era in terms of success, serves as nothing more but a defensive mechanism to say these Arab owners doing the same shit as PSG are not so bad after all - because of what was before them. Isn't that cynical and flawed?
>>154958878>every single serious historian agrees that everyone was equally retardedNot really no, Germany does harbor a major part of the blame for giving Austria the infamous blank cheque when they were retards who couldn't get on with the times and let go of their empire in the Balkans
>>154959488No one says we're not at fault at all. But saying only Germany is to blame for what happened in the summer of 1914 is beyond retarded. It does not work, and that's the dominant historian view on it as well nowadays. Not only among more pop-focused scholars like Christopher Clark
>>154959565Christopher Clark's view isn't at all the dominant one, some historians even call him a neo revisionist
>>154955467You don't know what cargo cult is.
>>154959627>>154959615>>154959565>>154959488>>154959162EVERY single video I’ve seen shows white people writing
>>154959666Rioting*
>>154959615That's why I said "not only". What the fuck are we arguing about here? The Fischer hypothesis has long since been rejected or at least deweaponized considerably. And yet - to be fully clear again - no one denies Germany bears a major responsibility for the outbreak. It's just way more complicated than "uhh, Germany started it out of nowhere for no reason, they are at fault"
>>154959705The Fischer hypothesis hasn't been deboonked, it was just overstated in its extremes (e.g. the idea of a war of aggression planned years in advance), but ultimately no historian today claims that everyone shares an equal part of responsibility. The real consensus is that Germany gave Austria the blank cheque, and escalated the July Crisis more readily than others since German leaders were betting on a localized war that could achieve strategic gains.
Stop larping as countries, in a couple generations those niggers will be as french as not showering
>>154955621Paris is full of niggers and sandniggers.
>>154959733>>154959733That's no consensus, that's just a fact. But it's equally a fact that France was very revanchist and that Britain also felt confident enough if push came to shove. And it's also a fact that there was a chain reaction waiting to happen. Neither Germany nor Austria were completely on the war train before Franz Ferdinand got ACK-ed, and the last thing they wanted in such a case was a full-scale global war. And yet shit had to go down because everyone pulled others in, and all of these great powers felt they could win somethingBerghahn lays the multitude of structural causes (internal policies of A-H, European alliance system and bloc formation, arms race between all great powers) down quite nicely, for example. He places most of the blame on the small leadership circles in each of these nations, but highlights that Germany got the entire thing rolling once and for all by supporting Austria and then miscalculating up to the point where the only option was "okay, fuck it, it's all fucked anyway and we might win this if we get ahead early". That's just very different from "Germany started WW1 because they wanted to be the big guys, everyone else did nothing". That's just some /his/ meme at best. Germany's crucial involvement in the formation of this war was more of a structural one than an ideological one, and their commitment was towards a logical ally and without a global war in mind
>>154957339your context is lacking- auteuil had plenty of whites, much more than arabs. 95% of bougnoules in ile de france used to support marseille before colony sold the club- lutece falco were former KOB- tigris and boys used to hang out and travel together- karsud occupied a central position in auteuil, hunged the french flag there, were cool with boulogne, doing nazi or serbian salute and shit- the guy who died in 2010 were a part of mob who stormed auteuil and got there asses handed to them- only the former supras survived the qatar era, mostly because they did not took part of the kob/bb85 vs. tigris warin any case none of the rioters actually support PSG, go to the game... and they will loot the same at the end of the month for the fâte de la musique, and the next one for the 14th of july...
>>154957339>>154960016Bonne santé !
>>154957339>To add even more context, PSG first and historical stand called Boulogne was white skinned and so politically far-right, brownoids were not allowed in the stand.this is pretty big exaggeration
Germans are the elite human capital of gentiles, and rightfully stood against the anglo jew historically.Now it's the most geopolitically cucked country. Brutal.
>>154958913>so that soviet kikes wouldn't steamroll the entirety of europe as they had plannedIs there any evidence that Stalin wanted to expand westwards past Poland? When Stalin received reports that Germany was invading the USSR he didn't believe them at first. >(You) should have fought on their side, as would have UKFrance and the UK basically let Germany get away with remilitarising in 1936, annexing half of Czechoslovakia in 1938, annexing the ENTIRETY of Czechoslovakia a few months later, invading and annexing Austria after a phoney referendum. If anything, France and the UK were TOO lenient with Germany right before WW2 started, if Hitler had stopped before invading Poland he would have gotten away with dominating central Europe. >ushered in an era of national socialism that brought the golden age of europe Except for Slavs, it wouldn't be a golden age for them.
>>154955467In France if you don't cheer for PSG's victory you are deemed "clubist" (I didn't know this word). All hail the diversity fandom !
>>154968881>clubisttop kek
kek /sp/ hates PSG now? This board was rooting for them last year. What changed?
>>154958696>>154958791Versailles was pure treachery. The 3rd Republic deserved to be crushed, and would have brought you to the same point you're at now had it persisted.>>154959488>>154959615Niall Ferguson is an unabashed Atlanticist, globalist, and Rothschild apologist, and even he blamed Britain in The Pity of War. (for needing to get involved in a continental conflict which was none of their business because >"hurr, we cannot allow a leading power to emerge on the continent, durrr").
>>154969185I've always hated them because of what they are. But they did get less insufferable after abandoning the big money superstar approach. Still, hard to root for them in earnest. But I think plenty of people rooted against Arsenal instead, I don't see a big difference in sympathies between now and last year. Last year just seemed more obvious
>>154969240Versailles was much more lenient than whay happened to Germany after WW2. And Austria-Hungary was punished much more harshly than Germany by Versailles(even though thr Hungarian government didn't want to go to war, Hungary was punished the hardest).
>>154969335I don't disagree, but I'm addressing FranceAnon's claim that Germany ruined Europe, when the "liberal democracies" were more culpable.
>>154969335Austria-Hungary got punished the hardest because it was impossible to keep together anyway. It was the epitome of a dying concept, becoming obsolete in the face of nationalism. There was no way it could hope to continue to exist after the war. It had to break apart. That's why the entente didn't even bother with them in the treaties when it came to the assessment of the war and just added a paragraph placing the blame on GermanyHungary is even more glaring. That land they held was granted to them by Austria, the Austrians were still calling the shots as push came to shove. And most of that land wasn't realistically Hungarian, it would have broken away. It's not comparable to Germany in that way, where Germans lived, with the exception of a thin strip of land in northern Schleswig, the furthermost tip of Silesia, and Posen. Still, there were plenty of Germans there despite not being the majority. Hungary should have kept the south of modern-day Slovakia, and you could have tried to draw a different border with Romania, but that one was always going to be a clusterfuck
>>154969503I mostly agree with you about the viability of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but the autistical insistence on nation-states has also been a problem for Europe.
>>154969593You'll have to explain that last part to me in more detail before I can say anything about thatA-H didn't only have the issue of being multinational, of course. Given where this area came from, it was bound to fall apart at some moment. It's not comparable to a clean slate (in that regard) like the US either
>>154969937I can comprehend and recognize that. And yet I think it is impossible to deny regardless. It's just who we are. I am a German, and my loyalty is to my people first and foremost. The state exists to serve these people; it is no quality of its own. What else do I need? This is the truest to ourselves we can be. Isn't a multinational entity more prone to being either a faceless artificial one or a construct dominated by a select group? I'd say so, at least. Europe cannot be wiped clean in that regard, there is too much history. I don't believe this has to lead to more war.We Germans have plenty of cultural diversity on our own already as well. There is, of course, a certain level of division that makes things all too ridiculous. My personal ideal of Germany is admittedly not 100% identical with the borders of the Federal Republic of Germany, because that's a state much younger than our people
>>154969632I wasn't speaking specifically about the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but it can be applied there as well.The insistence that the people comprising a state need to be uniform. It fragments larger countries into weaker ones less able to assert themselves internationally; it eradicates the (actually good) diversity that can sometimes arise from coexistence; it eradicates the variation that naturally exists within a people in favor of a "national standard; it elevates the mass-man to the ideal, with a resulting flattening and degradation of culture; it creates constant irredentist inter-state bickering ("This is rightful clay of our people, look at map of old kingdom!! No, please ignore map of even older kingdom!!")Blame goes to both sides: the central faction demanding everyone bow down to them, and peripheral factions demanding their GLORIOUS separation because they have a slightly different pronunciation of the word "dog.">>154970009fug, needed to fix typos
>>154970009Germany does have less of a problem with internal homogenizing, due to the legacy of the HRE and your present federated structure. >Isn't a multinational entity more prone to being either a faceless artificial one or a construct dominated by a select group?Yes, although that's more a symptom of modernity; a state can derive its legitimacy from other sources than the people at large (for better of worse). You can also have a confederated state organized around a common principle. I'd also posit that any society is inevitably dominated by a minority faction, even if 100% ethnically uniform (you just want to make sure you're in that faction, or that they're on your side), and that "the people's state" is an illusion.I'm not opposing nation-states, but the tendencies they can enable, and the idea that they should be the model for all of Europe.
>>154955621pajeets=arabs=blackies
>>154955621French tradition. You wouldn't understand.
they monke
>>154959077Based Finn, sorry for my fellow countryman's retardation, the role France played as a Jewish foothold in Europe is a nightmarish matter indeed, and I'm afraid we've gone too far to turn back>>154974368Based Jano Garcia lmao
>>154969503>Austria-Hungary got punished the hardest because it was impossible to keep together anyway.Retards always say this and it's a meme that needs to be debunked. A-H was perfectly stable as a state - the various nationalities rose in support of the state and for four years, despite massive casulties, hardships and the general strain of war, the state did not collapse like so many expected. It only broke apart because Emperor Charles I basically let it. You could make very strong arguments that both France and Russia were much more chaotic states than Austria-Hungary (and most of the problems in A-H were due to the Hungarians, so they got what they fucking deserved).
