>>154967868
>the person who gets fouled needs to take the shot
I agree, there is really no counterargument to that, right? It is so obvious it should be that way

>>154967868
just don't trip zambo ngumbu

>>154967897
Yeah. They are already imbalanced because more often than not the chance was nowhere near as good as the one your being provided with the penalty. Choosing the player is the icing on the cake.

>>154967868
I agree. The fouled player should be required to take the shot. It's a bit iffy for other situations, though
If it's a penalty resulting from a handball after a blocked shot, the player who took the shot should take it. But there may be the rare freak event of players fucking up in the box without opponent interference ... I guess then it's the player who was the closest and would have profited the most from the situation? That might be tricky. But still, they should go for it
Also, we need to be less autistic about keepers having to stick to the line while the shooters can basically do everything they want until the last step. Fortunately enough, this gay stutter run-up seems to lead to missed penalties often enough despite being an advantage on paper

you fools. the penalty is supposed to be a deterrent, and you want to make it softer? it sure won't convince players to commit less fouls.

>>154967868
Oh yeah? What if one of the 6 stadium snipers thinks the fouled guy looks like a terrorist and shoots him dead, what happens then?

>>154968893
There simply are way too many. How many goals were scored via penalties 30 years ago? The least you can do is make it less of a deciding factor by not allowing each team to give the chance to a single statpad master. If the conversion rate goes from 78% to 70% that way, it's objectively a success and also clears up various statistics regarding individual achievement. Refs should also be a bit more lenient when it comes to physical contact in the box, or at they should be even stricter when it comes to (potential) dives

File: 1774905337672869.png (107 KB, 866x567)

107 KB PNG

>>154968994
>There simply are way too many.
I agree with this desu, Fernandes comes to mind as he became their all time pen scorer in no time

>>154967868
I agree, would make the game better as then you won't have their best player taking up the pens. Would probably have lowered Mbappe and Penaldo's stats desu

>>154967868
just one of those obvious changes football should adopt but won't because the people in charge and the elite clubs are terrified of any sort of improvement
same reason they won't get rid of extra time and make it so the clock stops when the ball is not in play. it would instantly solve the gay ass timewasting bullshit that plagues the sport, but apparently that's somehow not desirable

>>154969061
and messi's stats at the wc. :)
surely the officials wouldn't want that

>>154969070
a clock is stupid. at least with the usual 90 minutes you know when a game roughly ends, the difference of length between two games could be too huge, why do you fucking JEWS always want to change what works?

>>154969193
because it's obvious it doesn't work when stats say that on average anywhere between 30 to fucking 50 or 60% of game time is wasted and lost with faggots taking three years to inbound, faggots pretending to suffer fatal injuries for another five years, and then faggot refs taking an entire century to check something on the var screen, instead of, you know, time spent playing football

>>154969070
I agree that net playing time is a good idea in principle. But implementing it is relatively hard, I don't see clubs agreeing to it unless there is a definitive technology available. They won't just accept a dude with a stopwatch; this would feel too arbitrary for most people. A real technology is available nowadays, I think. However, it would only be possible to implement in a handful of top leagues. It would cause some rifts between pros and amateurs and top leagues and other leagues. Also, there is a bit of a "tradition" aspect to overcome, of course
Still, I would go for it - if I knew they wouldn't use this to shove ads into breaks. Let's be real: they will. And personally, I think that is not acceptable. It's a matter of principle

>>154968893
by this logic they shouldn't even have to take the penalty shot, just give them the goal

>>154969366
Many other sports do it and it is no problem at all there

>>154967868
this particular shot reminds me of that flash penalty game i used to play as a kid

Instead of penalty shots, make it so fouls inside the box are awarded instead free kicks from within the half-circle of the box (taker chooses placement, minimal wall)
At the 3rd foul it becomes a normal pen
This would bring back free kick specialists to the spotlight while also balancing the atrocious penalty advantage of the current game

this sport is full of disingenuous cherrypicking and counting penalties as goals has to be the worst one

>football is ... le bad, thread no. 2718373
go back to your containment board and take all other tourists with you

>stop pointing out the flaws in my only sport
acquire additional sports fag