[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sp/ - Sports


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: cruyff.jpg (32 KB, 399x501)
32 KB JPG
We all know that in the 76-year history of this sport since Maracanazo, only three players have stood out from the rest by a considerable margin: Messi, Pelé, and Maradona. That said, determining fourth place is more than complicated. For me, the candidates would be Cruyff, Di Stefano, Ronaldo Nazario, and Cristiano Ronaldo. Ronaldinho, Zidane, and Beckenbauer are a step below. Cruyff and Di Stefano seem like the most likely choices, being global players. Ronaldo could be another option, being the best attacker and the one who comes closest to Messi in offensive aspects. The portuguese, therefore, is the weakest link in this equation and, for me, is destined for seventh place. But anyway, I think I'll go with Cruyff.
>>
>>155543698
probably me
>>
>>155543759
Hristo Stoichkov?
>>
>>155543698
Kill yourself
>>
>>155543698
Cruyff didn't even get a sticky, he isnt relevant
>>
>>155543873
nah
>>
>maradruga
>top 3
Lel
>>
>Pelel
>Top 3
Kek
>>
>>155543698
Ronaldo (9) in terms of sheer ability, Cruyff for legacy.
>>
File: IFFHSMessi.png (789 KB, 759x720)
789 KB PNG
>>155544411
Yes, none of the other players in the top 10 and outside the top 3 have played better than Maradona. He only trails Pelé and especially Messi. Until Messi emerged, it was widely agreed that Maradona and Pelé were the best players of the century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHckmCHEDuU&t=339s
>>
>>155544581
It's very difficult to determine. For me, Ronaldo is better in attack and physically, while Cruyff was better as a complete player, a playmaker, and more cerebral.
>>
>>155544499
Until Messi, he was widely considered the GOAT.
>>
>>155543759
this guy
>>
>>155544196
Once again, the angry sweden cuck, just because people here don't consider his portuguese.

4. Cruyff
5. Ronaldo
6. Di Stefano
7. Cristiano Ronaldo
>>
If we’re considering overall impact on football (player, coach/manager, …), then surely Cruyff is the goat right? Unless I’m missing someone very obvious.
>>
File: 28.jpg (57 KB, 194x286)
57 KB JPG
>>155546165
I'm talking about the ranking for football players.
Anyways, Di Stefano was a great coach too. He even was the coach of River and Boca. Even Real Madrid.
>>
>>155544883
Absolutely, and Ronaldo could take a ball from one box to the other leaving rivals behind. A center forward like that can break any tactic.
>>
>>155543698
Globohomo and FIFA wants to censor the White Race and us all.
>>
luis suarez
>>
Messi and Cristiano are the best. You have footage of everything they have done. From the other ones you only have highlights and whatever some old boomer makes up to convince himself football was better 70 years ago
>>
>>155550048
For Maradona you have everything, except the Argentinos Juniors era. You also have everything of Ronaldo Nazario, and they are better than the portuguese.

>From the other ones you only have highlights and whatever some old boomer makes up to convince himself football was better 70 years ago
I agree with this.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.