I always knew that with a few more black players and a hint of rigging that we could become one of the top contenders
>>155563026US should be in the dark horse category. Still hasn't payed a decent team and even Canada scored more.
>the assassin of australia>the pulverizer of paraguay
>>155563026USA will get knocked out against the first elite team they faceMorocco is overrated and cant finish to save their lives.Netherlands and England are historical chokers.Spain is still a top contender.Brasil is Brasil,even if they are not at their best they can still beat anyone.Top contenders are Argentina, Spain, FranceContenders are Germany, BrasilDark Horses are USA, Norway, Belgium, Colombiaif Portugal drops Ronaldo they can join thew Contenders rank, otherwise they suckthe rest of the teams have literally 0 shot at winning the WC
>>155563026>Mutt in top contendersTwo months and a half too late for an April's fools.
Make another tier for the ones who will NEVER, EVER have any sort of shot at the championship at this cup.
>>155563026This is either bait or is the kind of chart created by someone who has been watching ball for a grand total of 2 weeks.
>>155563026like the actual accurate version is thisthe rest of the countries are there just to sell tickets
>>155563026• Demote Netherlands and Morocco to Contenders• The US all the way down to In the hunt• Mexico, Switzerland, Cote d'Ivoire, Belgium, Norway to In the hunt too• Czechia, Paraguay, DR Congo, Canada, Egypt to Dark horses• Japan promoted to In the hunt• Idc about sorting out Dark horses and Long shots, so I'll stop there
the USA is going to win it all
>>155563221>midget ronaldo obsession
>>155563563huh?have you seen him play?Portugal plays with 10 players when they field himhe is detrimental to the team...if they want to have a real shot at winning they have to bench himthey have a really good team and can be an actual contender to win the WC, but they need the full 11 players and the full pitch to be able to do so
>>155563221England is winning the World Cup, you absolute retarded sudaca
>>155563026>Morocco6/10 bait
>>155563626its coming hometm 1966england have lost 2 finals and 3 semi finals wince 1966they are full on chokers, same with netherlands
>>155563659Argentina were serial chokers before 2022. Messi literally lost 3 international finals in 3 years and quit the NT like a KWAB.
>>155563659Hang on a minute. We are still celebrating your racisms. Don’t behave like that until we play you You white nigger
>>155563026lol no you suck
>>155563026shit tier chart
>>155563026Honored to see us mentioned but we have no chance against the top 3 if we suck at scoring that bad!
>>155563681yeah, we had a dry spelland it took the best player in the history of the sport to break thatyou guys have Kane and Jude Bellingam, good luck with that60 years without winning shit>>155563714if we play, in semis im 90% sure you guys winbut then you guys would lose against either France or Spain in the final
England has won 1 (one) game against a middling team, and suddenly people want to put them as favorites.
>>155564152Yes.
>>155564207Enjoy watching them lose to someone like Ghana, I guess.
>>155564250You sound like a bitch
France is by far the most likely one to win. Some insane golden generation they have going for them.Spain is overrated imho, they are going to choke against the first strong team they face.Imho France, England and Germany are the strong contenders here.
>>155564302Have you watched England at a world cup before? They always do well at group stages and then lose to Iceland or something.
the only real teams this year: Germany (obv), england, netherlands, france, usa (decent for quarterfinal but i think fifa will rig them to the semi)
>>155564350Now they have a german coach, obviously choking is in their DNA but we'll see, i saw something different this time
>>155563483this is the more accurate version. when's the last time a team other than Argentina/Germany/France/Spain/Italy/Brazil won?I'm sure one of Croatia or Netherlands or maybe an African team will go to the quarters or semis, but they probably won't win, and deserve dark horse at best
>>155564437>they have a german coach>england still played like absolute shit the first half of the croatia game
>>155563026>flag>topic
>>155563483>brazil
>>155564468well Croatia is a decent side at least. Germany (today), spain, Portugal suffered against micronations
>>155564595To be fair Cape Verde never lost a WC match
Shitholebros it's not looking good
Serious chances: France, Argentina, maybe GermanyIf stars align: Netherlands, maybe, and it is a big maybe, Brazil - even then probably notGood campaigns, cant win this wc: England, SpainCan reach semis: all but middle eastern and I highly doubt africans except Morocco Do not argue with me, this is the absolute truth
>>155565398>Can reach semis: all but middle eastern and I highly doubt africans except Moroccowait wait, you're giving middle eastern teams a HIGHER chance than african teams?
>>155564964>didn’t even qualify>life is good
>>155563626UHMMM... BASED??
>>155564152England had the highest ranked opponent of any big team and bumraped them. Your next cope?
>>155565540It makes sense when you realize Brazilians don't watch soccer, which makes sense given the absolute state of their team.
>>155565636>England had the highest ranked opponent of any big team and bumraped them.Croatia is not the highest ranked opponent of this WC group stage and Modric should retireAlso, your pattern is overperforming at the start then choking at the end
>>155564448>Argentina/Germany/France/Spain/Italy/Brazil won?>when last did a team win other than the six teams that won the last six tournamentsGreat intellect mate
>>155565636so?you could beat a team with gods and the monstars in them by 999 to 0 in groups / ro16 / QFand you guys would still choke against a team of cripples in the finals or semisyou guys are chokerssame story as the netherlands
>>155564448Past performance does not guarantee future results
>>155565979last 15last one that wasnt one of those 6 that won was England in 1966
Apologise.
>>155565636>old folks team was high rankedholy copeola you guys really are seething lol
>>155565979dating back to 1970, retard. and if you include england and uruguay, no other team has ever won it>>155566084obviously, you can't guarantee anything. but there's a pretty high chance the winner is from one of those past winners, and those teams just happen to be the best teams in general
>>155566117>>155566215But those are also the same six teams that won the last six. Which means that the game is far more competitive than it's ever been.If you include the 7th tournament then two of those have also been new winners.
>>155566215In the 90s, people were saying that to explain how France and Spain could never win a WC, they were the perennial losers… until they won
>>155565540Im saying middle eastern teams wont reach semis, and that I doubt africans can reach, with the exception of moroccoIn english, A but B means A with the exception of B. It is funny that the burger poster didnt get the correct meaning of the sentence. It is even funnier considering brazilians are well versed in football tendencies and history, while burgers are notoriously averse to the sport, which they call soccer and know very little about. The chef's kiss is anon's ignorance of the fact that I established that I was telling the absolute truth, which cant be contradicted. It is the absolute truth, after all, and saying it is false would trigger the principle of explosion in logic, and who would want to open this can of worms? Have a nice wc, and remember to take burgers statements on football with a grain of salt
>>155566573yeah and in 98 they had Herny, Veira, fucking Zidane and the level of the tournament in general was subparin 2010 they had Xavi, Iniesta, etc and were easily the bestto have a new winner that would mean they would have to have better squads than France, Spain, England, Germany and Argentinaim sure Gakpo and Netherlands qualify in that rightor the geriatric team of Belgiumor Portgal playing with 10 because they start with Ronaldo in the fieldand the rest of the torunament is even at a lower level than thatthe odds of the winner not being among France, Spain, England, Germany and Argentina is almost non existent
>>155566573anything's possible sure. but both Spain and France's teams in their WC wins were insane roster-wise. I don't think there's any non-past winner who can claim to have as many stars as those 2 teams didCroatia's roster is probably the best in terms of names, but they're all past their prime
>>155566929like not even counting the lower tier shittersPortugal would have to beat Argentina, England / Brasil and France / Spain to be championsNetherlands would have to beat France, Spain / Belgium and Argentina / Brasil / England to be championsBelgium would have to beat Spain, France / Netherlands and Argentina / Brasil / England to be championsis it possible? of couse, even Panama has odds at winning, albeit astronomicaland compared to the odds one of the previous winners win this WCnot just from a squad power perspective, but also from pressure and most importantly knowing how to fucking win it allthe odds of a non winnner to win it this year is neglibleyou need a superb golden generation to be able to do it for a first timeBelgium and Croatia were close, but this tournament there is noneonly Portugal, but theyd have to leave CR7 at the hotel for that to be possible
>>155563026>USA>top
just wait... you will see...after we fucking destroy senegal, no one will doubt us
>>155567646>after we fucking destroy senegalI wouldn't bet money on that
>>155563221>if Portugal drops their best player they can join thew Contenders rank
>>155567646I know we were playing friendlies but still, we manmarked your star and completely neutralized him. Senegal is doing the same but using one of their super ngubus. Can you actually defeat Senegal without Haaland?
>>155567811a 41 year old has been that rathers get in the way of their teammates for a low chance of scoring instead of letting another player shoot for a higher chance of scoring is detrimental to the team
>>155563060>welol
>>155563026Really? Damn. Thanks?
Almost nobody in the USA expects our team to go anywhere. Getting two tournament wins and winning the group lead in our least important game is already satisfaction enough, and if our team got sent home right now they'd still be cheered for trying. Anything else they can do is just another cherry on top of the cake.
>>155567920>without Haalandnopebut I dont see how that matters as we'll be playing with haaland
>>155568821I do.
>>155568821I think I'd be disappointed if they were eliminated before the Round of 16, considering that they'll face some sad sack in the Round of 32. That being said it wouldn't surprise me if it happened.
>>155568821You sound like a fag. They either win the World Cup or they're fucking deported.
>>155563539Netherlands have the best midfield of this WC. They'll reach semis minimum
>>155571530Netherlands midfield isnt even top 5 this WC....England, Portugal, Argentina, France and Spain all have better midfieldsand you could make the case for Germany and Brasil as well
>>155568142my jersey number is 20 and I'm the striker
>>155571584>England, Portugal, Argentina, France and Spain all have better midfieldsEngland could rival with it, the rest lmfao absolutely not, especially France and Argentina. Rodri and Pedri are cooked. Portugal should be the best on paper but they're dysfunctional for some reason. Gravenberch-de Jong-Reijnders is peak and they've been setting tempo in both games
>>155571767Netherlands plays Gravenverch, Reijders and DejongBe for fucking real...Argentina has Enzo Fernandez and MacAllister alone France has Olisse, Rabiot, TchuameniPortugal has Bruno Fernandes, Vitinha and Nevesidk you dont know shit about football or you are trolling, bc all of them put netherlands midfield to shamethen again, you are canadian, so its expected for you to know jack shit about ball
>>155572343I take for granted you didn't watch the Netherlands games so keep it with your headcanon retard vilero >Argentina has Enzo Fernandez and MacAllister De Paul carried in 2022 but he's not what he used to be anymore and you know it and these two are not as good as you think they are>France has Olisse, Rabiot, TchuameniOlise isn't a midfielder dumb chimp, and Rabiot-Tchouameni gotta be France's worst midfield in ages, no finesse, and no Griezmann anymore but they'll compensate for that with their attack anyway so my point still stands>Portugal has Bruno Fernandes, Vitinha and NevesBest midfield on paper but was awful and dysfunctional for some reason, they can prove me wrong next game if they somehow get their shit together but Dutch midfield was more impressive in terms of possession, vertical passing and technical quality>idk you dont know shit about football or you are trolling, bc all of them put netherlands midfield to shameYou're slow and retarded
lots of delusional people in this topicI know more about football than every single one of youhave been to more games than all of you combinedthe favorites to win are Spain and PortugalGermany, France and Argies are strong contendersBelgium, Brazil and England are dark horses
>>155563026that Japan game was pure magic and they deserve to be higher.
>>155563026>mutts>top contendershumor thread?
>>155563105This, Turkey was just that bad, one can argue the worst team of them all
>>155567811>Dominican insight
>>155579624Based Canadian, first you guys liberate our country and now you defend our NT
>>155563026Beyond retarded.>>155563483>brazil that high>spain that high>france above argentina>no japan, which should at least be in dark horse>all the dark horses being actual non-contendersMarginally better than OP's retardation.
>>155567811>best playerstick to baseball guyronaldo isn't the best player on his club