[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sp/ - Sports


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3690.jpg (35 KB, 712x500)
35 KB JPG
Who did it better??
>>
Turks did it over 2 games

Ecuador didnt have many chances in their 1st game
>>
Turkey's was worse because Paraguay was literally playing down a man for most of the game. Not to mention the ref drawing out extra time for no reason, it was like the whole universe conspired to give Turkey a goal and yet it just didn't happen.
>>
>>155570358
Asspain.
>>
>>155570358
Curaçaos GK saved a lot of certain goals, Paraguays GK didnt save anything at all, Ecuadorians can say its unfair that their gk had a Buffon + Neuer + De Gea + Schmeichel + Dida night and that he will never do a performance like that again, but Turks cant even blame the keeper, they just kept shooting/heading wrongly.
>>
>>155570394
Ecuador hit the crossbar/posts like 6 times the first match.
Turkey was still more comical though.
>>
File: turkroach_genocide.gif (2.29 MB, 320x214)
2.29 MB GIF
>first team mathematically eliminated
hahahHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHA AND THEY WERE SO COCKY AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAA
>>
>>155570358
Give the KEK to Turki
>>
>>155570358
Ecuador hit way too many posts in 2 games
Turkey's downfall was more dramatic
>>
>>155570358
Ecuador was actually shooing a lot on target, the goalie was just too good.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.