You can't tell me anyone in group G is better than Italy, Poland, Peru, Chile, or Venezuela.
>>155605172Why didn’t they qualify then
>>155605172Qualification isn't perfect, autismfriend. If you're mid you may or may not qualify.
>or venezuelanice try yonaiker
Don’t forget Denmark, Cameroon and Nigeria
They could have simply qualified instead of not qualifying
you underestemate lewandogski choking abbilities
>>155605172they're all much better than us
>peruAbsolute dog shit
>>155605172We easily beat USA 5-2 a few weeks ago, Iran is just much better than you
>>155605172>or Venezuelanot a soccer country
>>155605431>not hiding their tactics for the WCWe didn’t even have half the team. We would booty blast you guys
There simply aren't forty-eight national teams out there good enough to provide some entertaining or high stakes matches at the World Cup. It's not like there's been some disgregation of a huge football country in the last years either (as was the case with the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in the nineties). Contract the number of teams at the World Cup. Can you imagine a rugby or cricket world cup with over twenty teams?
>>155605172>Peru, Chile, or VenezuelaSouth America has been especially exposed this WC.
>>155605172Peru mentioned!
>>155605172Ireland would rape all those shitters
>>155605494far more people care about soccer compared to rugby or cricket. the only 'world class' rugby nations are England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, and France. the only 'world class' cricket nations are the above, with India and West Indies substituting for France.
