>fifa confirms that the decision fifa made is correct based on an investigation carried out by fifa

>>156220344
FIFA investigated FIFA and found no wrongdoing.

Oh good. I just wanted them to confirm that it was correct. Now I don't have to worry anymore. I guess I was wrong.

>>156220344
>we have investigated ourselves and have found nothing wrong

>B-but the rules said
Blow it out your ass

>Bill Clinton: Bill Clinton investigated Bill Clinton and can confirm that he did NOT have sexual relations with that woman

>>156220344
>just trust us bro

time for croats to apologize?

>>156220344
>watch with my own eyes live ball doesn't touch him
>continue watching slow mo replays ball doesn't touch him
>continue watching post game analysis ball doesn't touch him
>but FIFA said their magic sensor said it did because Penaldo must move on
And you dare tell em this shit ain't rigged?

>>156220344
They need to do something about these rugpulls, people only remember those parts.

>>156220449
>that depends on what your definition of "is" is

>>156220344
Why are we still on this when the croatian player himself admitted he touched the ball?

>Epstein: Epstein investigated Epstein and can confirm that he did NOT sex traffic minors and adult women.

>>156220554
kek

File: 1778351626940281.png (1.25 MB, 1280x720)

1.25 MB PNG

In 2022 where did you stand on the sensor? Did you trust the science or decide that it doesn't count?

>>156220698
Pissidogs definitely trusted the tech on this one

>>156220639
He said he wasn't 100% sure.

>>156220639
In Croatian, he said "I think I felt I small contact with hair"
The way he said it with such a degree of uncertainty, it easily could be the sound of a ball flying past your ear and the air it moves causing a sensation.

But that aside, according to FIFA itself hair touches shouldn't be counted unless they significantly alter the movement of the ball, like hitting a hair bun and such.

>>156221158
imo the way he worded it implied he sensed a change in velocity and direction

>>156220344
If we're all being honest, it's only people that dislike Portugal (and very likely hate Ronaldo) that are arguing it was the wrong call
Correct call, simple as

>>156220449
>getting impeached because some slut sucked you off
Cringe

File: 1775361278383392.mp4 (3.98 MB, 1280x720)

3.98 MB MP4

In the last angle you can clearly the see the trajectory of the ball change slightly
Either way he made himself part of the play
Correct call

>>156221533
I still haven't gotten a good explanation why the next hit off the head of #13 didn't matter.

>>156221615
doesn't count if it's "unintentional touch" or something

>>156221615
Because touches by the defenders that aren't intentional don't invalidate offside

>>156220344
Welcome to 2 days ago bro

>>156220698
Saw both with my own eyes. Bruno scored and this one was an OG.

Not letting jew tech tell me what I see is wrong.

>>156221158
That's the rule yet thrown out for Cristiano. FIFA wants a finale to be Portugal vs Argentina for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

I think the rig will be in for Portugal vs Spain soon too

File: images (58).jpg (32 KB, 678x452)

32 KB JPG

>>156220344
>body behind rigging says rigging was legal

Crohoes mad

>>156221690
>>156221678
I am only able to assume a defender in this situation is doing everything possible to play the ball out of in front of his keeper. Also his body (head) is moving directly towards the ball.

>>156221690
>ducks correctly to head the ball following its trajectory
>merely fucks up the header
Yeah, "unintentional", I can call the striker grazing the ball "unintentional" too then

>>156221822
>>156221886
Wtf are you on about? He literally ducked out of the way
You're 100% supposed to clear the ball of the box in that situation, not pass it back
Ronaldo derangement syndrome

>>156221690
>>156221678
So, another bullshit decision then. The defender obviously crouched to get into the ball's trajectory.
This bothers me more than le science call because at least it was equally autistic when denying both teams goals due to microscopic offsides

>>156221917
>He literally ducked out of the way
He literally ducked his head into the ball during a situation where you'd expect him to be doing everything possible to clear the ball.
Do you have another reason why or is this the best you have?

>>156221937
>>156221937
>>156222067
>The defender obviously crouched to get into the ball's trajectory.
So instead of making himself bigger he makes himself smaller to get in the way of the ball?
Take your meds please
Correct call, keep seething

>>156221917
#13 would have to be intending to allow that ball to land on the ground right in front of the keeper for your explanation to be consistent. He is clearly aiming his head toward the direction of that ball. He made a bad play and it was called back. It cost the game.

>>156222110
He is making himself smaller to get low enough to put his head on the ball.

>>156222147
this stuff didn't exist before in football btw, it used to be that any kind of touch like that from the defender plays the attacker onside. this "deliberate" and "non deliberate" bullshit was added to the rules only recently, and yeah it's retarded as fuck.

>>156222190
Prove it
The second half shouldn't even have had 10 min of extra time + tip btw

>>156222253
>Prove it
lmao I am demanding you do the same. I am not the one doing mental gymnastics to make the goal disallowed.

>>156222110
Sure, sure ducking to move out of the way of the ball is what you would expect of a defender in this situation. He must have read the script in advance

>>156222337
What mental gymnastics?
The sensors and the referee said it was offside, the replays show it's offside.
You're the one saying it's not, the burden of proof is on you.

>>156222436
Did the script demand disallowing Ronaldo's goal and giving all that insane extra time too?

>>156220344
>rigger denies rigging
no way

>>156222474
I am focusing on #13 aiming his head toward the incoming ball, now you are moving the discussion back to ball sensors. I am telling you that #13 fully intended to play that ball because that is his job, not to get out of the way from it.

>>156222572
It makes no sense to make that ducking movement to get to the ball
You'd know this is you ever played football in your life fatso

>>156222474
Yes it did because time extensions are based on pure vibes just like your interpretation of that defenders intent.

If you asked me I would have allowed both Ronaldos and and that Croatian guys goals too.

>>156222668
tell me why it makes more sense to get out of the way of that ball for a defender. who did he want to have play that ball if not himself? He was just letting it drop in so the keep could make the play?

>>156220344
Football is saved

>>156221258
why are you arguing the intent of croatian words with a croatian when you're a swede

>>156221533
01-07 seconds in the webm shows the clear fact #13 was doing what you'd expect a defender to do, aim his body in whatever way possible to play the ball based on it's incoming direction. Otherwise he is allowing the ball to drop in, but who else is he expecting to clear it if not him?

>>156222765
He likely thought he could let the ball pass and the teammate behind him would clear the ball

>>156222474
The script was referring to somehow knowing a Croatian would touch the ball, but so barely it wouldnt even change course, and with that it would get to another Croatian right behind you who was offside. Knowing all this is the only where crouching would be the correct play in this situation

>>156222925
Take your meds please
He was likely letting the ball pass for Nuno Mendes that was directly behind him and could clear the ball easily
The ball bouncing like that was a detriment if anything

>>156222910
Would you say that is a common thing defenders do this close to the goal?

>>156221158
This is stupid. Hair shouldn't count. What's next, sweat? That also comes out of you

>>156223083
It's risky, but it happens

>>156223055
In what universe would a defender rather let the ball past him backwards in the box, hoping one of his teammates is behind, and would actually be able to clear it, instead of clearing it himself? Additonally consider the time which is 90+13 and your team is defending for their life.

>>156223256
Just so you know, what you are telling me here is what I am calling mental gymnastics. I see three players, one blue two white trying to play that incoming ball with their heads. All three are trying to head that ball in some direction.

>>156223527
actually its two blue and two white trying to head the ball away.

>>156223464
Hoping? Why wouldn't he know the other player was there from the beginning of the play? Is he blind?

>>156220344
Based on what, the ball touched a couple of hairs on his head?

>>156223593
So we are back to reading the script in advance, unless the guy is growing eyes out his ass

You know I would rather Portugal had won 2-0 outright (which is what I honestly expected because their team is better) than think about this bullshit and read your delusional takes. It ruined everyones experience of this WC, no matter if they were emotionally involved or not

>>156223891
Bro no cares, you made it to a final and a semi-final in the last 2 World Cups and you're always acting like you're underdogs that got reballed
In the end, the referee made decisions that benefited both teams and you can keep seething or accept it

>>156224224
you'll do anything to get the last word to land on your feet with your mental gymnastics.

>>156220363
jejejejj

>>156224224
The only controversial decisions benefited portugal
You people keep whining about the added time but portugal scored a goal after the 90th, with celebrations and everything of course they're going to add more than originally intended, it's standard

>>156221690
>>156221678
If a defender plays the ball on purpose you don't get called for offside so what difference does it make? Fifa rules that the croat hair touched the ball, it doesnt matter what the defender did.

>>156225373
Ronaldo disallowed goal
Second half didn't have near enough stoppage to justify 10 minutes, let alone go past them
Keep seething though

>>156221370
ackshually, it's because he lied about it. if he said "hell yea big willy got little willy wet" nothing would have come of it

>>156225373
>It's standard
It sure as fuck wasn't standard last night lmao