English bros... our noblewomen willingly became concubines for Viking BVLLS... not like this... Norway already defeated England genetically and spiritually... viking cum flowing out of every english hole...
>>156604186BVRTAL
>>156604186>cucking for another mans countrywhat has Norway got to do with you Mohammed?
>do cuck shit like washing and combing your hair to appeal to sloots
>>156604216>incomprehensible screeching from our former colonial subjectskek
The vikings actually had very little genetic impact on the country. Like most of the invasions, very few came over and even less had sex here.
>>156604270We impregnated your women and left... Our paternal ancestry is present among you...
>>156604279I1 is a Scandinavian haplogroup and a genetic marker for paternal Scandinavian ancestry. Unsurprisingly, it is highest in the Eastern coast of England where there was the highest amount of Danish settlements. Very cool to think 1/3rd of the men there have paternal Scandinavian ancestry...
>>156604270What? Isnt like the entirety or northern england + your royal bloodline pretty much all viking dna?
>>156604186Anyone that really understands women knows the Vikings didn't have to rape most of them to reproduce. A woman sees her own men get hacked to pieces she will want to fuck the invaders, it's not that complicated. Not saying rape didn't happen, I'm sure it did, but I'm sure the bulk was consensual.
Anglo woman being whores, nothing new.
>>156604213>bathing every SaturdaySee that's where we differ, I bathe Fridays.
>>156604186british slags have always been lusting for BVC
>>156604186>Norman chronicler writing 400 years after the factseems legit
>>156604232imagine how foul bongs must have smelled when this is all it took for the Great Replacement to take place
So fruity little nordcucks did all these tryhard rituals just to appeal to women while proper english lads just walked outta their bog bath and just gave their missus a quick pounding no questions asked
>>156604186Women are attracted to 2IQ nigger baboons example number #18199304736614793001165378392020163637383
>>156604327But then did that come across with the Anglo-Saxons? We can see the high percentage of I1 in Ger/Denmark.
>work in HR in any reputable company in Britain>go through job applications and only invite candidates with Norman surnames for an interview, throwing the rest of the applications into the trash>start interviewing your applicants and notice they display civilized mannerisms while having a strong Norman facial phenotype, suggesting little to no mongrelization with the practically subhuman British underclass over the centuries>hire themDo similar things happen in your country?
>>156605709>By Richard Savillcmon now
>>156604327the original britain people likely migrated from what is now the netherlands and denmark thousands of years ago when people could still walk to britain by foot.
>>156604186>willingly became concubines for Viking BVLLSYou mean vikings raped them since they were the niggers of Europe?
The zenith of Danish cultural output is the LEGO catalogue.
>>156604186True. Anyways, BAP is a Straussian Jew spy who collaborated with Bari Weiss in the David project at Columbia
>>156604232>complaining about sluts when life expectancy was 40 around that timeyea, gg no re faggot
>>156604186why are you so obsessed with england my nigga. your genetic footprint in the isles is middling at best. norman & germanic DNA is far more prevalent by factors of multiple degrees.
>>156604186I'd just like to add, bathing in a historical context meant taking a full bath. When you hear that a culture is perplexed of another 'bathing once a week' or that a historial figure 'only bathed twice per year', they're misconstruing about having access to a full tub and being able to fill it with water. Not that they just barely ever washed themselves.
>>156607631ThisThe english regulary jumped in the bog, but this wasn't called bathing, it was called bogging
>>156606806Lego is English