[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sp/ - Sports


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: vghbn.jpg (350 KB, 1080x590)
350 KB JPG
How different Britain would be if instead of William Hardrada had conquered England?
>>
File: 1781647291199320.jpg (134 KB, 736x920)
134 KB JPG
wut
>>
>>156613364
If they won at Stamford Bridge they'd still have lost to Willy. Plus Hardrada was ancient so Norway would have lost the kingdom shortly regardless.
>>
>>156613364
>william
You mean 'arry?
Also this >>156614562
>>
English would still be a fully Germanic language instead of the Germanic-Romance mongrel tongue it is today
>>
File: 1783357113314455.jpg (25 KB, 547x365)
25 KB JPG
heh
>>
You nerds make me cringe
>>
hmm
>>
File: FYQNUloz1PcGUfsJ7idrA0.webm (1.01 MB, 1276x718)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB WEBM
https://www.instagram.com/glam_app/reel/DafvlgAtAhJ/
>>
>>156613364
Probably would have remained germanic anglo saxon since the danes had ruled before without changing the culture and social structure of England, but then without French expansionism, Britain would have never conquerer the world, so England would have remained an isolationist irrelevant corner of Europe, in a twist of irony, French would be the lingua franca of today if they didn’t bother with England.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.