IFAB Laws of the Game, 2025-26Law 3.7https://downloads.theifab.com/downloads/laws-of-the-game-2025-26-single-pages
>>156649375.
>>156649375Tldr?
>>156649375wdym?Aint reading that shit, monkey.
>>156649525>>156649693Go back to jerking your micro-clit to blacked porn
>>156649525>>156649693Too Large;Didn't Rape: VAR should've checked the play before the goal and it shouldn't have counted.
>>156649928Both of us are whiter than you, Jamal.
>>156650146Never mind I just read it and it says the oppositeIt should only be checked if the attacking team has the ball. As the goalkeeper of the team in possession kicked the ball VAR can't intervene
>>156650467No? That's only "If a ball is going into the goal...", which isn't the case. The interference happened at the origin of the play, the game should have been stopped right then and there, so the goal shouldn't be valid. This is exactly like a foul that happened at the origin of a play that resulted in a goal.
>a ball with a lot of backspin mystifies sudaca mongrelsjej
>>156651265No? It's like the ref touching the ball and him giving it back to the team in possession but reversed to the defending team.