Our eyes tell us the ball hit the camera cable.BBC’s 3D technology tells us the ball hit the camera cable.But the sensor inside the ball didn’t notice it therefore it didn’t happen and we must all bow down to the technology.>B-b-but Argentina!Fuck off.
one does not exlude the othernow we will see who rigs it better
who cares lol
>>156684224don't forget that the sensor reacted to some croatian hair but did not when hitting steel
>noooo, I love holaaaand why did they lose Keep crying
did Infantino force the Norwegian goalkeeper to kick the ball into the cable?
No advantage gained
Tell me more about that 3D BBC technology
>>156684504Infantino used his telekinetic abilities to move the ball midair
>England head coach Thomas Tuchel said: "There is a chip in the ball who can tell you if a hair touches it as we know since the Croatia v Portugal game, so they should be able to tell you if it [a touch] happened [here].lmao
>>156684224>>B-b-but Argentina!Yeah, about that
>>156685186This real?
>>156684224for me it doesnt really matter in terms of that game, there was no "rigging" or anything.but the implication is crucial: you cannot trust anything fifa says. not about sensors, not about offside, not about technical issues, you name it. they lie whenever it is convenient for their agenda, whatever that is. they showed us some graph of the sensor when it touched that one guys hair to justify their decision, but in this case there is supposed to be no reaction of the sensosr? fuck off.
the anti-England narrative is>the norway GK kicked it perfectly to activate the apparent rig against his own teamthe (true) anti-riggi narrative is>refs proactively give Argentina leeway on the most obvious decisions everthese are not the same
>>156684504Fifa shoot goybeams at players they want to lose, one of many israeli military technology given to them by netanyahu himself.
>>156684224Cable of god mate
>>156684371Kek
