>The ball did not hit the wire
>>156684877I've yet to see this fucking wire everyone is harping on about lol
>>156684877Kek
>>156684897qed
>>156684877Volumes. Powerful. Literally 1984
>>156684877Ball chip registered no contact. Pretty clear if that's the case.
imagine an anglo boot stamping on a human face forever
>>156684877Everyone knows that it didn't, shut upEveryone is saying itEveryone
>>156684877All the pigs are all lined upI give you all that you wantTake the skin and peel it backNow doesn't that make you feel better?The pigs have won tonightNow they can all sleep soundlyAnd everything is all right
I'm being gaslit into believing that the ball hit a wire even though every video shows the ball clearly following a normal ballistic trajectory~
>>156684897You’ll be hanging from it when Englel inevitably lose
We're being gaslit into believing "LE HECKIN BALL HIT LE HECKIN WIRE OHHH MY SCIENCE OVERTURN THE GAME!!!" is actually a thing that happens in football. You see how absurd and dangerous NPCs are by how they've adopted this script and screech so passionately about it.
>>156685076>Under the Laws of the Game, a camera cable/wire suspended over the pitch counts as an "outside agent," and if the ball makes contact with it, play is supposed to stop immediately and be restarted with a dropped ball (the goal or play that followed wouldn't stand). This is treated the same as if the ball hit a referee's equipment, a spectator, an animal, or any other object that isn't part of the normal field setup.
Since FIFA has made it clear that games are to be decided on tiny technicalities imperceptible to anything but super computers, it makes complete sense for people to hyper analyze perceived rule violations and look for advantages.
>>156685076>You see how absurd and dangerous NPCs aretell us about it
Maybe they should have stopped play, but can you imagine how outrageous it would be to take away an otherwise perfect goal from England just because the ball grazed a wire before it landed midfield? Try to see it from the other side Swen.
>>156685338Zlatan explained it pretty well to airheads like you
>>156685372See but that argument is still contingent on the ball's trajectory being changed. It visually doesn't look like it did, and apparently the ball's sensors don't think so either.
>>156685475It very clearly did. And both haaland and the norwegian goalie ran up to the ref and pointed at the wire right after the goal. >the ball's sensors don't think so eitherFIFAs blatant lies is what this thread is about
The ball did hit the wire but it literally doesn't matter in the slightest either way.
>>156685509>haaland and the norwegian goalie ran up to the ref and pointed at the wire right after the goaland we should've had a penalty because kane and bellingham ran and pointed to oscar bobb's leg right after spence fell
>>156685625If Norway also reflexively tried to cheat at every opportunity, their reaction to the goal should also have been taken with a huge pinch of salt, but they don't so there is merit to it
>>156685553>it doesnt actually matter because the rules mean nothing when my team playsperfidious albion
>>156685475>See but that argument is still contingent on the ball's trajectory being changedwe have a precedence with portugal vs croatia where the hair did not change the trajectory but a rules were applied strictly.either way, everything about this is simply inconsistent. it can not happen on such a professional level that this just depends on the whim on the referees.
>>156685978That's what makes it seem intentional by FIFA. The theory that they want the "big" teams with the big names to reach the semis and final, because they want to capture market share in north america, asia and africa, and most people in those countries only really tune in for the big names and big countries, sounds plausible
>>156686163>big countriesAlso inb4 some autismo thinks I mean big geographically. I mean big as in considered very good at football
>>156686198No one was gonna think that. You may have autism.
>>156686235i thought that (and i do have autism)
>>156686163I don't know how they expect to penetrate new markets when almost every game ends up with some controversial shit. It reeks of unseriousness.
Never seen it personally, is it as good as people say?
>>156684923>"The party said the ball chip registered no contact. Why would you question the party? You must be an insurgent."
>the ball did not hit the wi-ACK
>>156686362Yes, some parts may seem a little dated but its 25+ years old now
>>156687327Do you understand what backspin is? Watching a tennis balls trajectory will blow you mind
It hit the wire for both teams. Why didn't the Norwegians want to defend the ball just because it had touched a wire 30 seconds previously? Are they afraid of wires of something? Sounds gay.
>>156684877Well I've watched every clip you retarded cunts have sent, and I can't fucking see it. So I will believe the evidence of my own eyes that it hit nothing
>>156684897>I've yet to see this fucking wireThere's a George Orwell quote about this
Can we get some footage of the wire, the ball hitting the wire, the camera shaking from impact to the wire, the ball's internal sensor detecting an impact with a wire, etc?Or just more of the same clip of the Norway keeper making a shit pass?
>>156687327This is clearly a backspin, from the ball hitting the camera cable and "spinning back down"
>>156687327looks like nothing to me
>>156685509FIFA famously loves England and hates those damn media darlings and senpai favourites Norway. The bastards!
PENALTY FOR ENGLAND!
>>156685475It's on contingent on 'changing trajectory' you fucking idiot. It is LITERALLY just contact. That's it. A touch.For example, if your micropenis was flapping in the window along the line, and a defender kicked and ball and it touched your micropenis, since your penis is so small, like far too small to ever please an woman, the ball won't change its direction, like at all. Your penis is too small and pathetic. But that doesn't matter, your micropenis (probably the reason you are transitioning into a woman) was an outside agent. Play would stop.
>>156687450because the laws of the game clearly state that the game has to stop when that happens? but i guess the norwegian players were a bit naive to expect the ref to be fair
>>156685978> Rules must be strictly appliedOk we add VAR> VAR refer tells ref to review a play he originally thought was not worth a card> On review a red card is given The real issue is that we can not have it both ways. Either everything is reviewed or nothing at this point. The wind is blowing toward everything (the off sides shit shows that). The game just needs to get on board with that and the players need to realize that
>>156687653Because they checked it. If the sensor doesnt sense it then how can they? Why would the ref rig it for England? Whats your genuine belief for that?
>>156686163>sounds plausibleFalls down immediately because everyone loved Norway. The row. Haaland and everyone loves and underdog
>>156687327If there was a camera, wouldn't there be video of the ball from a better angle? And wouldn't we see that camera shake if it was on a wire that got hit?
>>156687327>doctored footagepost the real clip
more pertinent to speee...
>>156684987keep dreaming delusional scotstranny
>>156687327Literally altered footageYou guys are desperate
I hope Argentina wins against EnglandThen Spain against England in the bronze game
>>156685372How did he feel about Egypt's cancelled goal?
