Wow! Pure coincidence right?
>>1566975224 years more crying macaco, it'll be a long time
>>156697522All were correct though
>>156697522source?
>>156697522>0 VAR Decisions against>Most favorable decisionsEven heavily favored teams get at least some VAR decisions against them, Argentina has zero.
>>156697522Stop noticing goyim
>>156697751https://news.northeastern.edu/2026/07/11/world-cup-2026-favoritism/
>>156697522Var's decisions against England were mostly correct, it's nobody's fault bong bros have flopping divas
>>156697706Yeah but this means the VAR does not get reviewed when the decision will be against Argentina.Also they get more stuff reviewed when they ask: In most matches no ref would check the ludicrous dive.
>>156697751the data comes from NetSI Sport
>>156697911I don't think anyone is trying to claim we're paragons of good behaviour who never do anything wrong.The problem is that the rules aren't equally enforced.
The riggings will continue until morale improves
>>156697522Google for "La mano de Dios" to see that it isn't the first time the Argies have rigged the World Cup.
>>156697935>the VAR does not get reviewed when the decision will be against Argentina.Which decisions?
