yeah they're dead. expelled from PL, rejected by EFL due to ownership and financial rules, none of their players will stay, they'll need the money to pay for legal costs after being sued into oblivion. abu dhabi will fuck off too.
man city fans should seriously start looking into a phoenix club.

theyre gonna get relegated

in england, we have LAWS, this isnt the dunes of arabia man

IT WAS ALL A DREAM

Forgive my ignorance but what's wrong with owners spending as much as possible no matter where the money comes from?

They do that here in baseball i think. The owner with the most money gets the best players

b-b-b-but /spee/ told me this is a nothingburger and at worst they'll get a slap on the wrist (fine + 1-2 window transfer ban) cuz muh EPL shekels.o algo

Last time this happened with Man City literally nothing happened. Their ownership is too powerful and influential to see them relegate
They might get a 5 point reduction kek

Hmmm

>>157969661
It probably isn't good for the sport that a bunch of sandniggers or whoever can buy a random club and turn them into the best team in the world in a few years.

It probably isn't good for the league either that the same three or four traditionally big clubs are the only ones with a chance of winning it either, mind.

>>157969927
If the ownership were going to get their way, the charges would have been thrown out. They're done.

>>157969661
Because it just allows you to buy the league, which isn't fun.

Which is exactly what happened.

File: league.png (144 KB, 351x550)

144 KB PNG

>>157969661
An attempt to equalize a league that has established elite clubs that are global brands and clubs that are fighting for relegation and/or can't get money as easily. Yes, as a tradition, a club getting money from outsider donors is essentially ok.

relegated to the scottish premiership