>Your party enters town>A kid bumps into you>You notice they stole a twinkie you had in your pocketwhat does your character do?
I kill himThat's what you wanted to hear, right, OP?Let's not do this shit again
At least it's not another argument over having snacks at the game table.
Adopt him an give him a better life
I use magic to reconstitute him into a twinkie, then shove him into my pocket, as I did with the last one.
Burn the whole town down
The child is unaware the twinkie is in fact drugs. He consumes it, and becomes a twinkie addict, never to know peace again.
>>96429532Loudly and violently shit himself.
>>96429532Wasn't this that litmus test thing that Anon posted about months ago and got another sperg exceptionally angry about?
>>96429532Kill everyone in town.
>>96429714A lot of people got extremely angry at the idea of fictional character stealing something they just found out they theoretically had, and a lot of people spent way too much time explaining in detail why wanton murder is not rational.
>>96429714You're missing a step. The spreg is the Twinkie poster using it to bait >Bad people or something similarly inane.
>>96429873Yeah there we go. It's a weird moral judgement thing. Wasn't good enough to be a pasta but he might make a Milhouse out of it.
>>96429532I try to catch up to the kid and get my delicious treat back but don't make a huge deal of ithaha just kidding. I cast Power Word: Twist on his balls and then eat the corpses of his entire family in front of him
>>96429714Yes and now we're gonna keep seeing it for the next 25 years here
>>96429926yes
>>96429895the sperg is always the anon falling for the tamest non comital baitand we're gonna get a couple before the thread dies
>>96429532Do I have anything to go on? Did I see his face? Has he already disappeared in the crowd? What kind of setting are we talking about, and what is my character's role and standing? What is the state of the town and the wider locality?All of these things (and more) will determine what happens. Context maters.
>>96429873Only a hand full of retards got upset about this test.
>>96429532Watch as the Firetrap spell I had cast on the trinkie previously goes off, incinerating him and all within 10 feet. I then accuse the nearest crone of being a witch and have her arrested, then cliam my ten gp reward from the local majistrate. Being a Witchfinder is great.
>>96429532I cast 'Polymorph Other' on the child, turning him into a Twinkie, put both twinkies into an easily reached pocket, then hang around waiting for more pickpockets. After I have amassed a big pile of 'Twinkies', I donate them as a meal to the nearest orphanage.
>>96429532is he pretty?
>>96429988>. I then accuse the nearest crone of being a witch and have her arrestedI choked on my tea when I got to this part
>>96430002OP used neutral terms, you can imagine the kid as any geder you prefer for the most realistic and personal response
>>96429532Recover it by any means necessary - I'm gonna need it for my Twinkie defense the next time I'm facing murder charges.
>>96429532I Twinkie house him and habeeb it
>>96430008rape him
>>96429714Think so. Learned that day some speds just really despise twinkies, or something like that
>>96429532ITTY BITTY BABYITTY BITTY BOAT>I DONT BELIEVE ITHABEEBT IT!>TWINKIE HOUSE>>96429632BUM THE WHOLE TOWN DOWN
>>96429532I use my build made courtesy of RPGBot to kill the kid, and tell the GM he's a bad GM for not letting me roll to notice the kid in the first place.
>>96429532>what does your character do?Rape.
>>96430347Anyone in particular?
>>96430412Not racys.Indiscriminately.
>>96429714Pretty much, abd then said its a sign of a bad character that you don't just ignore it and let the kid go.I'm playing a !not Witch Elf. She's a violent drug abusing psycho. The child is killed, not for the twinkie, but for daring to lay a hand on me.
>>96430425Honestly, only normal people and npcs would let it go entirely. In a role playing game most people would go after the kid instead of merely letting it go, at minimum to get their shit back, and they’d be right to do so. It’d only be weird if they weren’t explicitly playing a psycho and decided that was their Joker moment and began burning the town down. Besides, anyone dumb enough to mug a crazy elf bitch with those level of bad vibes is arguably asking to get their shit kicked in to begin with.
>>96430425I don't remember anon saying that. I don't remember anon saying that there was one correct answer to that scenario in the first place, just that it was meant to weed out players who'd react with excessive violence to a minor inconvenience regardless of what their character's supposedly like.
>>96430471In an RPG people wouldn't just let it go, but I think a big part of it would be just thinking that if the GM felt like a minor bit of petty theft was worth spending game time on, there'd be more to it.
>>96429532Rape, obviously.
>>96429532>Your party is in town>A twink bumps into youwat do?
>>96430580see >>96430563
• I don't play games where Twinkies exist. Even if I did, my characters wouldn't keep them in their fucking pocket; that's retarded.• I don't play games where children can be present where the characters are exploring and fighting. Even if I did, a stupid, inexperienced, clumsy child wouldn't be able to go unnoticed from the heightened senses of explorers used to detecting danger in the fucking wilderness. It would be retarded to play any game in which characters expected to survive against ferocious monsters couldn't see a dumb kid coming a mile away.Kill yourself.
>>96429532It was a test! I "graciously invite" him into my band of thieves. If he isn't interested I have him trafficked to a wealthy noble in the sand kingdom to protect the secret of my band of thieves.I then kill every pet in town not on a leash or collar.
>>96429532Try to figure out what a twinkie is.
>>96430005See, she was a witch! she made you choke on your tea!
>>96429532Laugh at him, for now the curse twinkie has a new owner. He will wander the earth until someone begs for his twinkie or steals it to covet for themselves. Every time you eat it the twinkie appears out of thin air back in your pocket. There is no destroying it, the yellow sponge cake never spoils, only passing the curse on to its next carrier.
>>96429532>>>/qst/
>>96429714Yeah. Got a screencap here.
I call a doctor because twinkies are fucking disgusting and that kid is going to die of the world's most aggressive case of drymouth if he doesn't get help immediately
>>96431350The doctor picks up your call. He is currently picking up food from Arby's, but will be on the scene in a few minutes.
>>96429532>My character pimps the child out to the nobility for favours and coin to help cover the costs of their Sniff-Musk habitOh I'm sorry, is that not the answer you wanted?>This post brought to you by #DarkEldarCorsairGang
>>96429988There's a game called Daemonologie you might enjoy.https://store.steampowered.com/app/3048140/Daemonologie/
>>96429532Did the GM roll?
>>96429714It's originally from Reddit. It's supposed to filter out 'problem players' while ignoring that the scenario involves taking resources from PCs without rolls (this was bad form even in the 70s), and that using a fake kid NPC to force annoying scenarios on players is so old it was a cliche when I was a newborn and pretty much guaranteed to generate an excessive response purely out of contrariness.But I guess we can pretend 4chan came up with the idea if it makes you feel better.
>>96431553>It's heckin' reddit guys!I'm sure you've got evidence to back that up.Or you can pretend you do, if it makes you feel better.>Taking resourcesLolLmao
>>96431553>involves taking resources from PCs without rollsWhere did OP say there were no rolls involved?
>>96431575I'm not googling to find the thread, because I don't care that much. Honestly the fact that you genuinely believe this is clever makes me think that this is a conversation not worth having.
>>96431588Concession accepted.
>>96431532Hello?
Rolled 13 (1d20)>>96429532I roll a charisma check to convince the kid to kill himself with the stolen twinkie
>>96431553Sometimes, you lose your twinkie without a roll.That ain't called "bad GMing", kid, it's called "Life".
GRRRR DAMN BRAT CORRECTION IS NEEDED
>>96431633Nah, if a GM wants to do that I'm just gonna declare I take it back without rolling.
>>96431591It's just a hypothetical. You don't really need to roll for a hypothetical. Unless you don't feel comfortable answering hypotheticals and want to turn it into an actual game scenario. Or just really want to roll the dice. That's up to you and your table.
>>96429532>lizardman>loincloth has no pocketsTell me GM, what exactly got groped when they reached in there?
>>96431665Where in the rules does it say you can do so?
>>96431705>A small child touches your cloacae>What do you do?
Works IRL too. If you're on a first date or have a new friend, pay attention to how they react to stuff like a waitress getting their order wrong. My favorite trick for vetting guys is I mention a stray cat has been chasing birds away from my bird feeders. Without fail, psycho guys will take that as invitation to start talking about how much they hate cats and often suggest shooting, poisoning, etc.
>>96431553It's not a situation that happens in a game, though. It's GM asking "what would your character do if this happened?" If it makes you feel better, you can imagine any appropriate rolls being made and leading to the Twinkie thief succeeding - the point is to explain your character's reaction at the point where the theft has already happened.
>>96431726>My favorite trick for vetting guys is I mention a stray cat has been chasing birds away from my bird feeders.Wouldn't the more sensible answer just be 'Anywhere you could move the birdfeeder to?' or 'Put out food for the cats somewhere else to distract them?'For the record, cats can be cruel, they do enjoy toying with their prey. Doesn't mean they deserve to be destroyed or anything.
>>96429625I like how this implies the twinkie the kid stole was also a kid who stole a twinkie, and the twinkie that that kid stole was another kid who also stole a twinkie, and that twinkie
>>96429532What do you mean "enters town"? I live and patrol in a major city.
>>96429532What is the relevance of the image you posted?
>>96431766Jas as importantly; it also roots out people who can't imagine their character having a moment of distraction and not noticing someone dipping into their pocket/get defensive about the idea.>What, my character would never miss such a thing, all he does is jelque and squat, he's not an actual person with real reactions to thingsSuch people will always play empty, Patrick Bateman mode characters at best.
>>96431713Same spot it says the GM can take items i dont even know i have from my inventory even thought they arent listed in my inventory.
>steal something from the wrong guy>get killed in one hitI've seen at least a dozen liveleaks like this. Seems even more reasonable to happen in a surveillance free fantasy world with massively disparate power levels.
>>96431809That's weird, all it says there is that the GM is the final arbitrator of the rules. Why, it completely contradicts your claim in fact.
>>96431809So you're disquieted by a gm taking away a phantom item that exists solely for answering a question, rather than the gm depriving you of actual resources from your character sheet?
>>96429532I go find him and use my wizard powers to turn him into another twinkie.
>>96429873Only a handful of retards got upset about their intellectual superiors pointing out how objectively stupid the test is.
>>96431725"No, small human, that is not for you." Then probably try to get them back to their parents, mammals are weirdly attached to their offspring and I may get a meal or coin for the effort.
>>96431843>It's for your parents>High fives the bard
>>96431833>the GM is final arbitrator of the rulesI equip a pen IRL and start writing big numbers on my character sheet.Your move.
>>96430471If it happened in real life I'd pull his spine out through his mouth. I've killed children for far less serious offenses
>>96431858nta but I sodomize you right there at the table on sheer principle alone.I'm not even the DM, but I bet he'd help hold you down.
>>96431842Anyone that has to call themselves an "intellectual superior" on 4chan is definitely no such person
>>96431869I write "noclip" on my character sheet and you and the GM pass right through me.It's your turn.
>>96430555What do you mean "more to it"? All the GM does is simulate the actions of every object and being in the world according to laws of physics. If there wouldn't be any deep reason behind it in real life, there isn't in the game.
>>96431884Snatch the still material sheet off the table, close the pen and leave you trapped as an immaterial being in the void between worlds.Honestly you just solved the problem better than me hammering your prostate ever could have. Much appreciated.
>>96431586The OP also doesn't say no unicorns were involved.If you want people to know something, you have to actually communicate it to them, using language.
>>96431858>I equip a pen IRL and start writing big numbers on my character sheet.I mean yeah you can do anything you want in a solo game.
>>96431553It's him! The original sperg!
>>96431697Yes you fucking do. I have 12d Perception, Acute Hearing, Circular Vision, Life Detection, and Motion Detection. I also use 10d Constructs to maintain an invisible barrier of force around my person at all times. The just could not have gotten close to me in the first place.
>>96431942They still do, what now?
>>96431697Yes you fucking do. I have 12d Perception, Acute Hearing, Circular Vision, Radar, Thermal Vision, True Sight, Astral Sight, Life Detection, and Motion Detection. I also use 10d Constructs to maintain an invisible barrier of force around my person at all times. The kid could not have gotten close to me in the first place.
>>96431942...Your character would have all that up at all times of the day, every day of his life?
>>96431972Or what? Put it down and get Luigi'd?
>you are a POWER GAMER for the crime of... remembering your abilities.Holy fuck what happened to this board?
>>96431726yeah, no shit. cats eat birds. are you fucking stupid? Jesus Christ i can't believe we let you dumb whores vote, the only intelligent thing that ever came out of a woman's mouth is a cock
>>96431942>>96431959And thus you failed the test. Pic related.
>>96431766Thanks for weeding out yourself KEK
>>96431976How do they live like that, with all their senses being barraged by all that information? How do they shop for food? Take a bus? Sleep? Can they even enter a city without those constructs slapping random passerby all the time?
>>96431847Also an acceptable reward
>>96431793Sorry my character can't be distracted. Guess you should have built yours better, scrub bitch.
>My character isn't a person, they're a skin filled filled with numbers steered by me via remote controlGod this test is so good, every time this thread comes up it just keeps pointing out new retards in new ways.
1. Take the twinkie back2. Scold the kid for stealing3. Send them on their wayYou know the response an actual adult would have to a kid committing a minor offense.
>>96431934Nope, you continue running the game if you don't want me to set off the fuel bomb I rigged under the foundation. Don't bother looking for it, it's more tamper proof and disarm proof than the bomb the FBI couldn't disarm, and it can't be moved. If my breathing or heart beat are interrupted for any amount of time, it explodes. I also welded all the windows and doors shut. Sit down.
>>96431972Yes, that's what I said.
>>96431974The GM can't go anywhere without my approval.
>>96429532I recreate the following scene.https://youtu.be/sMk-HPBF6Mw
>>96432073Probably doesn't leave them much room or energy for adventuring then if they're expending so much energy to protect their coveted twinkie
>>96432006Nope you fail sorry. gg no re
>>96432060>NopeYeah sorry you're stuck with just solo games. Not just because you're a sperg with no social skills, but worst of all because you're not funny or creative.
>>96432009There is no barrage of information, the powers don't have that drawback. Why do you think his construct would slap people? What are you imagining?
Rolled 9 (1d20)>>96429532Rape him in the market square
>>96432036Yeah, you made up a twinkie and a kid, so I made up a character. Gonna cry?
>>96432050Characters are defined by the rules, just like everything in the game. Stay furious.
>>96432110Considering you haven't said what game you're pulling this shit from, you tell me.
>>96432085No, it leaves them with plenty of energy. None of the powers have the costly or harmful cons. You lose.
>>96432099I win and my dick is bigger than yours :)
>>96432150Alright. Then you can leave the table while I set up another game. But since you won the last one, you likely wouldn't mind if I don't invite you to this one.
>96432167Penis envy next huh? Pathetic, not even worthy of a (you).
>>96431991I'm kind of curious to hear what you thought anon's point was, because I kind of get the feeling that you misunderstood it somehow.
>>96432147Nah you have to guess :)
>>96432168Nope, you'll sit the fuck down and do what I tell you to or die.
>My character could never fail the twinkie testIs in and of itself you as the player failing the twinkie test. Even if your current character is an Exalted or some shit, you can easily imagine some other character you've played in that situation in a past game but choose not to.Continue being inadequate.
>>96432205I'm guessing then that there's no game where you're at my table then>>96432216Does that mean you're volunteering to gm then?
You people... you don't even know how deep the rabbit hole goes do you? Did even one of you stop to consider the fact that the mascot name for twinkies is also... The Kid..
>>96432190Nah you make shit up so I make shit up stay furious :)
>>96432216I sucker punch you and go out on my own terms, saving the world from your inane faggotry in the process.
>>96432221Nope I win :)
>>96432050It really is a wonderful deadspot to exploit. Since twinkie anon posted it I have used it, and it worked for its purposes. In my case it was stealing a pipe from a wizard, the guy I was considering had historically been a bad player but was putting out feelers to maybe change. His reaction indicated otherwise.>Kid steals your wizard pipe>I wouldn't play a character who smokes>He steals your candy bar>My character wouldn't eat candy >He steals your spell scroll>I kill him
>>96432395Honestly the most reasonable answer here is:>Actively Good wizard: Warn him off>Literally any other wizard: Let him kill himself, if he doesn't then I've got a new apprentice!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKR6Ax9HBZ8
>>96429873That's not what happened. Murderhobo behavior was the expected thing seeking to be filtered or checked for, but many anons, probably (You) included, got irrationally upset with the idea of a conditional hypothetical and proceeded to argue the most pedantic, pseudo-intellectual bullshit. And in one recent case, some faggot tried to argue that what he was really doing the whole time was trying to have a discussion about how the twinkie test should be improved and trying to seek ways to improve the specific details about the test, as if the issue was that the test wasn't exhaustively detailed enough to be valid, and not that responding to "minor inconvenience wat do?" with obnoxious faggotry wasn't a direct display of low IQ, emotionally stunted THAT GUY behavior.
>>96432458I understand what you're saying but instead I am imagining a wizard sternly telling a child that smoking is a bad habit that'll increase his risk of lung cancer by 30 times and if he continues down this path he'll surely perish!
>>96429532>How would you feel if you did not eat your twinkie bar this morning?
>>96432594>Local wizard uses magic to do PSAs about smoking>His debuffs are 'So here's what it feels like to be a 30 year smoker', 'Summoning of Mr T approaching you while under the impression that you've been hucking crack to school kids' and 'Bigby's lesser Federal Agent' (For when things really get out of hand)He'd pass the shit out of the twinkie test.
>>96432616Yoink.
>>96432703>Removing someone this hilariousI'd run an Elric of Melibone game for such a character, then just hand him the sandpaper and let him go to town.
>>96432754Oh don't get me wrong, I'd make it clear to everyone before the game even starts that the tone of this game is going to be 'OH WOE IS ME, MY DAINTY MELBONIAN SCROTUM ACHES FROM ALL THE HAMMER BLOWS THAT FATE HAS RAINED DOWN UPON THEM! :(' "Dude, put down the hammer then." '...Whatever for?'But yeah, it'd have to be a very specific tone and group.
>>96429532I sincerely hope this doesn't become a regular thread topic, but at the same time, I think retards need to be outted every so often so they can be humbled by having as many people as possible tell them that they are fucking retarded.>but the test is flawed and I wouldn't carry a twinkie and actually you can discern anything about me based on my actions, reactions, and opinions!Retards get dragged into the public square and pelted with rocks until they learn their fucking place. Your behavior is a blight upon everyone around you and yourself.
>>96429532...And none of you fags said, "Steal it back."
>>96429988Based Witchfinder anon.
>>96429532He's a magic thief so he's probably mildly annoyed and impressed that a street rat pulled one over him. Probably steals it back and tries to bait the kid for another go.Depending on his repeat performance he might become a patron to a small kids thieves gang.
>>96431835Apologies for the impending wall of text, but to give you an idea I'm the kind of GM who shitbrews The Ruby Weapon, slaps it in the middle of a campaign, and translates its mechanics 1to1 so players are forced to either cheese it or run from the fucking thing.And *I* think this test is complete bullshit. A person's character is sanctimoniously theirs. If you're gonna make up absolutely anything about them you absolutely discuss that shit OOC beforehand. Yes, even a twinkie. Because not only is it complete garbage roleplay, it also only opens the avenue for even worse roleplay as >>96432395 points out.>a kid steals a twinkie from your character>When did i get a twinkie?>idk you just have it>If i knew i had it i wouldve eaten it to after the last fight to restore HP>well you couldnt do that>well then why did i have it?>your character wanted it as a snack>My character doesnt like sweets.And this could go on forever.There's actually a super elegant way to do this exact same test by just having the kid approach the party and engage thwm in conversation (ROLEPLAY) begging for coins or food until players give in or find a way to get rid of him. If players ignore him, he just keeps following. You can even play it humorously too if they keep ignoring him. They leave town? He keeps following begging for coins. They start fighting some brigands? He's asking the players AND the brigands for coins. The players sneak into a dungeon? He's still loudly begging, alerting monsters to the party's presence.
>>96431991It's impressive how you you were given both the test question and the answer to it, then proceeded to fail it in a way the test doesn't account for in the first place.
>>96432811>Today? You stole from me a twinkie>Tomorrow? You steal twinkies for me
>>96431260>person seething is a wojakposterI'm not surprised the twinkie test caused him to fly into an incoherent rage. He could have just filled the text box with 2000 characters of "I'm retarded" and the message would have been the same.
>>96432292>We were the twinkie theives the whole time
>>96432774The only wrong answer is to argue with the test. Stealing it back. Hunting down the kid. Reporting it to the nearest guard. Slaughtering every child and cutting open their stomach to find the remains of your twinkie. Capturing the child, castrating him, and selling his eunuch ass to the local lord. All valid answers.
>>96432774Literally right here >>96431665
>>96432798Amazing midwit post. You've missed the point entirely and created an extremely elaborate way to fail the test spectacularly. Also, that's not how you use the word "sanctimonious"
>>96432839The hypothetical exclusively has dogshit answers that would get someone filtered by any GM because it's complete garbage ROLEPLAY for a tabletop TOLE PLAYING game.Do the world a favor and never run a game.
>>96432860>an extremely elaborate way to fail the test spectacularly.>saying "i didnt have that"Midwit > knuckledragger
>>96432871>>96432884The fact that you think this is about rules and scenarios and fairness shows that you aren't fit to sit at the table. It's a fucking hypothetical question and you're trying to nitpick the nonexistent details so you don't lose an imaginary item. You're not a good player. You're not a good GM. You're a pedant and a midwit.
>>96429532Try to stop him and give him a goodberry.
>>96432798Anon, it's just a fucking hypothetical. The specific details don't matter, you're welcome to headcanon how things came to be any way you want, but the only purpose of the question is to test your ability to come up with an in-character answer to the hypothetical. Something you will be doing over and over and over again in play.It's the same reason job interviews will toss out random questions like "what're your hobbies?" or "what's your favorite drink?" or "what's an awkward situation you've had to deal with on your last job". The actual answer doesn't fucking matter, just your ability to adjust, be flexible, and keep holding a conversational.All you want to fucking do is flex your midwit brain and be an insufferable smart-ass too good to answer a basic bitch hypothetical. That makes you undesirable at any table that's not for a simulationist wargame.
>>96432798I have to say that even if the test is barely a test at all, you seem more hung up on trying to "solve" the specifics of the test rather than addressing the intent to begin with. This isn't really a test you "solve" so much as showing you have a pulse and functioning brain.
So, time to invert the test.What would you, as DM, see as the perfect answer to the question for one of your players?
>>96432897>>96432916>>96432916>>96432928You asked why people hate this hypothetical and I explained it. If it was too long here you go:The hypothetical is shit roleplay thats why people hate it.If you need any further help, i can get crayons.>redditspacingI'll fuckin do it again.
>>96432945Engaging with the fiction and asking questions. The scene is set, the twinkie is gone. That's not changing. I want the players to be curious about the game.>Can I still see the kid?>Did anyone nearby see him?>I was thinking about playing [character concept that values some thing] so I would act on that value and...What matters is if they are willing and interested to play along. If they just want to argue about pointless details and go on the offensive to try and win a casual conversation between neutral or even friendly individuals over a game that isn't even being played yet, I don't want to waste my time with them. It's hard enough getting a game going and keeping players invested. If I've got to deal with one faggot at the table who wants to litigate every single little detail, the game will die very quickly and no one will have any fun.
>>96432995>You asked why people hate this hypotheticaNo one asked this. Yet again, you are making up details to try and win something that can't be won by arguing and trying to remake the whole discussion into something that puts you in the morally/intellectually superior position, because you refuse to accept that you have proven yourself to be wholly and clinically retarded.
>>96432849Oops - I stand corrected!>>96432846So, the player which fails the test is the one who interrupts the flow of the game by being a petty turd - like a 'rules-lawyer'? Gotcha
>>96432945Anything works long as it doesn't contradict what the PC has been established to stand for without sufficient justification. If they start asking how tf did they miss it I'll give them the classic "Dunno. Weird, ain't it?".If it's a system with random encounters then I probably don't have a plan for the kid but will roll with whatever conspiracy the players will gas themselves into believing. If it's a system without random encounters then I probably have the kid tied to some quest hook or prominent NPC and how that works will depend on player choice.
>>96433038More or less. Trying to rules lawyer a hypothetical displays a lot of stupidity. Like if you asked someone the breakfast question and they go>but my mom always makes me breakfast>what did you do to my mom?>why doesn't your question include that my mom exists and she makes me breakfast?>it's a stupid question because I already ate breakfast and you can't just say I didn't because that's a lie
>>96432945I could share you some I've accepted before with this test.>"I yell as loud as I can at the thief to stop">"I decide I've got bigger fish to fry than some pickpocket, but I let the local guards know there's a sweets thief in the area anyways">"I immediately start chasing the thief down to retrieve my twinkie">"I grab at the hooligan by the wrist and start swinging with my free fist">"I wait until the crowd thins and start stalking the thief right back so nobody thinks they can steal from me and get away with it without consequences">"I shrug and continue on my way, hoping the thief likes the booby-trapped twinkie he just stole">"I memorize the kid's face, then round up my posse so we can begin teaching this thief a lesson">"I gasp for a second, check my person, feel glad he didn't steal my wallet too, then just go buy another one"There's a lot of ways to answer it. I've seen some use magic to curse the thief, some use magic to just take back the twinkie, I've even seen one just pretend to ignore that they've been stolen from, only to immediately turn around and pickpocket the thief's wallet since they're fixated on absconding with that twinkie. It's really easy to answer and takes less than a couple minutes at most.
>>96432871But it's not a scenario that happens at the table. It's just the GM asking about your character's reaction if someone stole a Twinkie from him. How is this difficult to understand?
>>96429532Probably have a sense of mild surprise for a split second that one of those was in one of his pockets in the first place then move on because he doesn't really care beyond that.
>>96433094If it's a session 0 interview question it's fuckin whatever Morrowind has worse. But you have this faggot >>96433063 literally saying he makes the kid a random encounter.
>>96433038I'd say there's a few ways to fail it.>Insist on arguing the details as a gotcha - Going to Rules lawyer during the game and make it a slog for everyone, fuck off>Going full 'I want him dead, I want his family dead, I want his pets dead, I want his letterbox shit through' - Completely disproportionate response, likely to declare Jihad on an NPC and disrupt the game over petty shit at some point. Maybe let play as a dwarf with a book of grudges but otherwise no-go>Immediately going to mechanics and refusing to engage with it at all, not even engaging the hypothetical - Thinks a character is a sack of numbers being piloted about by him rather than an actual human being that exists in a setting, will inevitably do shit like 'My character is so optimized that no one else can even keep up, I won the game, we might as well knock off now while I jack off at the table since that's all the rest of the game is going to be and anything that gets in the way off that will make me huff, puff and snuff over it.'It's an open ended question and there's many ways to reveal yourself as a bit of a shit in answering it.
>>96432945>There's no twinkie in my pocket though-Well that means you fai->I look over at the boy and ask why he's trying to steal my dick
>>96433086This is what sends me reeling every fucking time this topic comes up: The question itself is exceedingly easy to answer and there's so few bad answers given in good faith that would genuinely make me want to outright deny someone a seat at my game. Even hyperbolic answers like, "I kill the thief" can be followed up with "come on now, be a little more serious." And then you can probe the player a little more and get a feel for their general tone and sense of humor....And yet, every time it's brought up, the question goes from a simple mood and investment gauge, to being an eye-opening psychological profiling session for people who are fundamentally lacking some key component of rational thought, and proceed to become increasingly irate, even as you tell them over and over that the exact details and purpose of the stupid fucking twinkie question, and they ignore you so they can proceed to rage incoherently about how the test is extremely flawed and wrong and stupid and how anyone who even defends the question is a heinous subhuman.All of that over a fucking hypothetical twinkie.
>>96432221Can't fail the Twinkie test if Twinkies don't exist.
>>96431752No.
>>96432221You failed my test :)
>>96432395What's the problem?
>>96433167But what about using OOC knowledge to justify cooking up conspiracy theories like this>>96432292And why has only>>96432821Acknowledged the possibility that the kid and the twinkie are the same and that we might be the original theif?
>>96432519D&D is a murder simulator
>>96432528You failed my test :)
>>96433187Failing to substitute in a different invaluable and petty item that fits with the setting is, in and of itself, failing the test.The test is 'Some NPC gets one over on you in some tiny way that won't matter in 6 hours time. What do you do?'
>>96432614There is no correct way for characters to behave.
>some anons, "Yeah kill the kid, dismember him, sell him to necromancers i don't care.">others, "UMMMM SORRY SWEATY KILLING THEIVES IN A GAME IS WRONG MMMKAY you are officially banned from my discord. No refunds."The twinkie reveals a lot i would say
>>96432769You failed my test :)
>>96431260>check the thread in the archive>"wow, this guy is really unhinged, this is like the 6th schizo post hes made">"no wonder people think hes an absolute sperg with all this-">scroll bar isnt even at 20%christ
>>96433232Depends on the game and the way the player explains it.>High fantasy setting where rougish child thieves are basically information pinatas you beat rumours out of with bags of copper pieces and everyone is playing a white hat'I guess I kill him' with a shrug makes it clear you're playing a character from outside the genre/style the DM & party is aiming for, but it can be talked over.And no matter how grimdark blackcore edgenails your setting is, your 15 minute rant on how the child is going to be dissolved in rape-acid isn't going to reassure me that you're going to be able to take it on the chin when you get a bad roll and your character is lost to the dickwolves.
>>96432801You failed my test :)
>>96433167My only real guess is that there are people who are hyperparanoid that this is more than just the equivalent of "What Would Jesus Do?", and looking for ways to "outwit" such a sparsely detailed hypothetical so they can win on their terms. And it's weird. Really, even the "I kill the thief" answers are fine if it's explicitly a game where everyone is playing criminals and bad people. It's the guys who immediately accuse you of railroading because you didn't roll dice for this that you want to be wary of.**And really, rolling dice like this wouldn't change the level of upset since they'd accuse you of cheating anyways
>>96433232One could even say the revelation works both ways.
>>96432050I didn't see the person you think you're arguing with.
>>96432846No such thing as a wrong answer. I have authority, you don't.
>>96431991Great job at being so fucking retarded that you found a new way to fail these kind of tests.
>>96432860You failed my test :)
>>96432916Wrong. Specific details are the only things that matter in all situations.
>>96433267>your 15 minute rant on how the child is going to be dissolved in rape-acid isn't going to reassure me that you're going to be able to take it on the chin when you get a bad roll and your character is lost to the dickwolves1) there are no wrong answers2) why the FUCK would you avoid witnessing a melty of that magnitude?
>>96432945The perfect answer would be "Why are you shit testing us like a woman instead of describing the room we're in?"
>>96429532I call the police and inform them that an unauthorized person is using the trademarked name "Twinkie"(tm) without permission or credit to the company. The DM is arrested for copyright infringement and sentenced to 2 years in jail and a fine not in excess of $5,000.I am a next level rules lawyer. Ensuring that the rules of not only the game but real life itself are strictly enforced. I did not fail your test you failed mine.
>>96432999Why didn't you create a situation worthy of being played along with? My time isn't free.
>>96433310Sir, this is a Wendy's
>>96433038Rules lawyering is obviously good, of course.
>>96433301>2) why the FUCK would you avoid witnessing a melty of that magnitude?Oh don't get me wrong, I'd be the first to throw some popcorn in the microwave and watch the meltie.But a single meltie is entertaining.One every week, on the week, at my table where I'm trying to run a game is tiresome.There's no universally wrong answer, but there are wrong answers for me. Same as >'Aschually I let the child go since clearly they're underprivilieged and resorting to crime to feed their family. Besides, reporting BIPOC people to the guards is genocide'>"...but I never said the kid was bl-">'Please, he's stealing, of course he's black.'Would be a no-thanks answer from me as well.It's a perfect question because each answer is going to tell you about the person, rather than be something that has a right or wrong.
>>96433222>you called out my retardedly-named test so you fail cuz I have no arguments T_TI don't entertain laziness, so find a better name or get bent. You fail the test of having a functional brain.>Some NPC gets one over on youI thought this was about the characters the players are playing, not the players themselves.It is a roleplaying game, after all. Why do you hate roleplaying?
>>96433312Because you're a subhuman dogfucker until proven otherwise and this is my table that you're trying to join. If I realize you won't fit now and tell you to fuck off that saves us both the next few weeks of you pretending you're not worm that walks made of dogshit and rats attempting to embed yourself deep enough that I can't remove you without surgical equipment.That a reasonable enough answer?
>>96433335>Why do you hate roleplaying?You have to remember the typical person who GMs a game is likely autistic and plays a lot of video games, so they think they need to run the game like a 50,000 line codeblock running an MMO for millions if players at once and not some fat dude leading a game of make-believe for 1-8 other people.
>>96432798>nd *I* think this test is complete bullshit. A person's character is sanctimoniously theirs. If you're gonna make up absolutely anything about them you absolutely discuss that shit OOC beforehand.This type of control freak is the exact person this test filters out so well. Twinkieanon had no idea how effective this test actually was kek
>>96432916>Using job interviews as an exampleBuddy do you have any idea what type of autist you're talking to?
>>96433322If it was about 15 years ago this would have been a golden opportunity to post spartan guy kicking Persian guy into a pit with the macro text this is 4chan.
>>96433362>I shit test my players to filter out... control freaksironed to a mirror finish
>>96433324This. Weak GMs just want a gaggle of sycophants who will go along with them and whatever they do. A real man what's to engage with their players and get called out when they do things that are either unfair or underhanded. It promotes a culture of fairness and honesty at the table when players and GMs can both keep each other in check.
>>96433023Can't help but notice that the control freak loves to make up details and presumptions to support his own argument, but demands every single possible question or scenario thrown his way be excruciatingly detailed and perfectly consistent.
>>96433324If you don't have at least 1 for every 3 normoid players, fucking nobody is gonna actually remeber what their characters can do and will do shit like roll before calling stuff cus they wanna see that NUMBER
>>96433213>conspiracy theoriesBuddy, those posts are in this thread right now.
>>96433417I have none at my table and everyone remembers their stuff just fine.For the one lazy player it's probably because he knows I'll just skip his turn or kill him if he faffs around too much.
>>96433398>I shit test my playersI shit test prospective players*. Saves me a ton of time and wasted emotional investment.
>>96433453Plot twist: lazy player IS the rules lawyer, he's just too lazy to ever bring it up.
>>96433232That just sounds like it's functioning well, if it reveals that you and the GM have very different views on the game's tone and the sort of punishment that can be expected for petty theft. If it ends up being a dealbreaker, then why not be happy that you both walked away from playing with someone you so fundamentally disagree with?
>>96433463Really, even if it is a stupid test, the kind of pedant that will attempt to it break it down molecule by molecule to monologue about why the act of ever posting a question to them that doesn't involve a roll of the dice is an attack on their character and freedom of thought instead of just being sane and going "This sounds stupid, give me a scenario closer to what I should expect from the game" are definitely not worth dealing with on a weekly basis.
>>96433312And yet you choose to waste your time, for free, arguing like an impotent retard. Your generosity is surprising.
>>96433522A wiser person would just ignore it and move on if they think it's so bad of a test, really. If a GM is going to shit test you and you end up hating the shit test, you're not gonna gel well with their group.But the type of player its meant to filter anyways will start screeching about how it's an invalid test, how it would never happen to him, and how you're a big ol' meanie for judging him.
Thoughts on enemies that can steal equipped items? Seems like (heh) the thread to ask.
>>96433551Also very true. Really says something how few people are arguing to either talk it out or just leave if they find this question that much of an issue.
>>96433595Fairer than a Rust Monster
>>96429532>Fallout character Kinda depends on how old the kid is/how destitute he looks. My dude grew up a slave so he's got a lot of sympathy for street rats and stuff. If it's just some punk he's at least getting his crap back because you don't just brazenly steal shit in the Wasteland. >Nechronica Twinkies don't exist in this timeline so this kid has broken causality and we all cease to exist. More seriously, she rockets down the street, tackles him, and takes her sweet back. He's lucky he didn't steal from one of the other two because they would probably merk him without thinking about it.
>>96433269Paranoid psychopathy and general mental illness might explain some of it. Feeling like they are being tricked or abused making them react with extreme hostility because they're having some kind of paranoid fight or flight response to the idea that there's some sneaky, abusive, deceitful manipulation at work.However, I think that only covers some of them, since some people are clearly displaying a complete lack of understanding of conditional hypotheticals in general, or even how their responses can be used by others to form judgements about their personality and beliefs. That kinda "dindu nuffin" outrage typically comes from left-of-the-curve low IQs
>>96432614>You're a hypocrite, Balthazar! You smoke!>When I was your age I didn't know, and if I had known I wouldn't have, and that's the deep dark hypocrisy of my character that serves as the motivation for my good nature!This character fucks>>96433595Generally don't like 'em, but they're alright. I think it's better to normalise losing items early than it is to make touching inventories taboo.
>>96433595They work best when you've got a table doing consistent bookkeeping for their resources. If time and money and food aren't being tracked, losing a sword to a swordgobbling ooze is inconsequential. If they only have enough coin and rations on hand to make the trip back and restock after looting the dungeon, that makes the player consider his other options or makes him think twice about running back to that room with the rusted, half-broken sword they saw earlier.
>>96429532>What is the child's race?Valid question
>General PSADo you believe "Rules Lawyer" means "Someone who knows the rules"? You are wrong! Rules Lawyer is a pejorative for someone who argues in bad faith for the rules to benefit themselves. It's an easy mistake to make! But now you know!
>>96429532>in character rational responseWelcome at the table>out of character irrational responseWelcome at the table grudgingly >rules lawyering or arguing semantics Asked to leave>"twinkies? Now you've got me thinking about food..."Asked to provide their own food for sessions
>>96433805A necessary psa because most newfags conflate the two.
>>96433805There are multiple kinds of ruleslawyers. There are ones who are dumb and insist on sticking to RAW even if it's retarded. Then there are ones who exclusively ruleslawyer when it's to gain a mechanical advantage.
>>96433844
>>96433094Since my character is a fully simulated being with a real mind (nVTS), I won't know how he reacts until it actually happens.
>>96433167False.
>>96433873This nigga asks his character for permission to play them
>>96433869Yeah that's a common cope. Nobody complains about rules lawyers in tic tac toe (or chess, or poker, and so on and so forth) because they're different from roleplaying games.
>>96433222What do you think invaluable means?
>>96433269Submitting to any test permits another to have authority over you. This shall not be allowed to pass.
>>96433869>>96433887>rules matter more in a PvP gameWhoa
>>96433276You failed my test :)
>>96433267My characters don't get bad rolls.
>>96433900A good example of hyperparanoia in action, thank you
>>96433351You failed my test :)
>>96433906rpgs are pvp games faggot
>>96433328>>96433682Just transcribe the melties, get TTS to read them and post em on jewtube. You'll wanna see one every fuckin day.
>>96433362Yep, it filtered out the control freak, you KEK
>>96433906
>>96433960Being the GM is also not rules lawyering, as it's the GMs job to decide what the rules even are. Try again.
>>96433682I once sat in at a convention game where I watched an elderly man, easily 3 times my age, do some shit like that, over the same exact kind of bullshit. Outraged that some decision was made for him to make the game run smoothly.
>>96433974
>>96433463lol you still don't get it
>>96433941Only if you shitbrew Pokemon into the game.
>>96433522He's right, it is an attack on his character and his agency. That's why you fail the test. The twinkie tests GMs, not players.
>>96433532nope :)
>>96433990nope, so long as there's a gm its pvp
>>96433974That's a player telling his comrade not to pursue, a GM would let the player try and fail.Try again.
>>96434013>That's a player telling his comrade not to pursueNo, because he's telling him what he can or can't do. Only the GM has the ability to do so. Try again.
>>96433595What do you mean? Anyone can attempt to steal things, that's not a special ability.
>>96434026nope it is
>>96433891You've got me there actually, non-vaulable.
>>96433909The test stole your twinkie.
>>96433670It certainly would explain your control issues :)
>>96434022>remind my teammate of his limits>instantly become the GMSorry chump, my game now.
>>96434047>remind my teammate of his limitsHis limits are determined by the GM, not you. Try again.
>>96434055>His limits are determined by the GMWow the GM makes everyone's character sheets too? What doesnt this guy have to do?
>>96434066>Wow the GM makes everyone's character sheetsHe determines what options are available for them, and could just make them too. Never played at a convention with pre-made sheets have you, nogames?
>>96434076>He determines what options are available for themWhich is not what is happening in the picture.
>>96433805No such thing as bad faith.
>>96433992That is so entitled and backwards it's pathetic
>>96434092>Which is not what is happening in the picture.Yes it is.
>>96433844If your game has retarded rules, you should be playing a different one.
>itt
>>96434134Agree to disagree homie
>>96433906They matter far more in cooperative games.
Best part of this entire discussion is you retards can seethe about how it's totes a test for DMs instead, how you didn't fail, everyone else did, you am big boy in the biggest boy pants, rah-rah-rah.But it still won't get you in the fucking door and every argument you make just reinforces the fundamental point of 'Great, you're not a good fit, see you.'Isn't the right to association such a wonderful one?
>>96433981Where is the spirit of the rules? How do you know that you're correct about what the spirit of the rules is? If the designers didn't intend what they wrote in the rule book, why didn't they write what they actually did intend instead? Why should I have to fix a product I paid for?
>>96434151You're free to be retarded and lie, sure. But this is exactly why I don't have ruleslawyers and backseat drivers at my tables.
>>96434022No, anyone does, by reading the rules. That's why they're written down, to provide a common frame of reference for all participants.
>>96434163Right to discriminate*And no not really.
>>96434118Nope, your attitude is entitled and backwards.
>>96434197>No, anyone doesIncorrect, only the GM does.>by reading the rules.The rules give the GM total arbitration over them and what happens in the game. You, as a player, do not have the role of telling others what they can or cannot do.
>>96434181This argument is kinda shit cus tabletop designers flat out say multiple times "if the rules dont work for your group, bend em". Granted that's just to keep as many paying customers as possible but still.
>>96434202The ability to discriminate can be its own virtue.Don't believe me? Fuck off into the woods for an afternoon and eat every single mushroom you come across. After all, there's no difference between any of them right :^)
>>96434205I know your attitude is entitled and backwards, you don't have to repeat it
>>96434163You failed my test :)
>>96434163If those people had the intelligence to understand any of the concepts you're talking about, they'd probably be less upset than they already are, and wouldn't be constantly fishing for (You)s by replying to every post in this thread.
>>96434185Nope you're retarded and you lied.
>>96434211>bro tells his homie "you can't add 2 plus 2 to equal 5">>You, as a player, do not have the role of telling others what they can or cannot do
>>96434217>The ability to discriminate can be its own virtueThat's exactly why I don't hire white people at my workplace, they're filthy disgusting rats who are greedy for more than they're worth and touch kids all the time.
>>96434211Incorrect, anyone does.
>>96434238No problem. By which I mean we'll see how that works out for you in the long term soon enough.
>96434232>96434239Nah.
>>96434213It's not an argument. Answer my questions. They're not rhetorical.
>>96434235>bro tells his homie "you can't add 2 plus 2 to equal 5"Which in no way is relevant to telling him what he can and can't do as a player, try again.
>>96434249Ugh ok fine>>96434181>Where is the spirit of the rules?Determined by the group at session 0>How do you know that you're correct about what the spirit of the rules is?By deferring to the tone set during session 0>If the designers didn't intend what they wrote in the rule book, why didn't they write what they actually did intend instead?Writers only get so many revisions before they have to publish. They can't think of or fit every minute detail in the limited timeframe either.>Why should I have to fix a product I paid for?Happens with literally every product in every medium.
@96434254>Which in no way is relevant toSo youre just doing this for (You)s, gotcha.
>>96434219Nope yours is
>>96434248Yeah.
Nah, you lose.
>>96434278I didn't ask why they don't think of infinite details. I asked why they didn't write what they intend. A person can't fail to know what their own intentions are.Doesn't happen with every product. I have never had to fix the rule system I use.
@96434320You, as a player, do not have the role of telling others if they've won or not.
>>96434320Nah, you lose.
>>96434306I accept your concession
I win.
>>96434327>I asked why they didn't write what they intendSee the first part of my answer
>>96434278>Session 0Troon detected, you use X-cards too kek
>>96434350Did you roll?
>>96434357You didn't answer. Read what I wrote.
>>96434143And why not? You can learn a bit about yourself.https://adamyala.github.io/morrowind-class-quiz/
>>96434143/tg/ has been over run with retards who are too young to played Morrowind.
And thank god for that.
>>96434444I'm imagining them just screaming at the screen once they got to the question about the sweetroll
>>96434489Do you often fantasize about other, superior men?
>>96431727So it's a repost of reddit content is what you're saying? Not surprising on modern /tg/.
>>96434542Where's the reddit post?
>>96434531
>>96431833That's true. Dead on. However, I don't want to do free form improv or read your unpublished novel, I want to play an RPG. So I'll simply leavr.
>>96431942>12d Perception, Acute Hearing, Circular Vision, Life Detection, and Motion Detection. I also use 10d Constructs to maintain an invisible barrier of force around my personThe theif has the feat: Toon Force.
>>96434489Doesn't everyone feign handing it over before tossing it upwards and decking the bully in the face?
>retard filter presented for all to ponder>retards get filtered>people explain to retards how and why they got filtered>retards proceed to kick and scream>people continue to laugh at retards>retards, not mow upset, proceed to spam the thread to kill it faster so people can't keep laughing at them for being retardsThis has happened at least three times in different threads that I've witnessed. Possibly more.
>>96434604>>retard filter presented for all to ponderMhmm>>retards get filteredSeems so>>people explain to retards how and why they got filteredDidnt work>>retards proceed to kick and screamYeah>>people continue to laugh at retardsYup>>retards, not mow upset, proceed to spam the thread to kill it faster so people can't keep laughing at them for being retardsActual psychosis
>>96434575>That's true. Dead on. However, I don't want to do free form improv or read your unpublished novel, I want to play an RPG.Same, that's why we made a filter to keep bad players out.
>>96434592Sane people do. But seems enough anons get upset at the thought of anyone so much as threatening their sweet treat that they enter an uncontrollable psychosis over it.
>>96431697The scenario you're outlining would involve the GM rolling. If he's not rolling, that's important context which changes my response.
>>96434639>>the thought of anyone so much as threatening their sweet treat>refraim the twinkie question to steal something non-edible>outrage vanishesjust fa/tg/uys bein' fa/tg/uys
>96434632(You) starved retard in action.
>>96429532My PC actually likes kids, so he'll be a little upset at first, but then he'll think the kid needs the twinkie and be happy for him.
>>96434641Let's say then he isn't rolling. What does your response change to?
>>96434641If you have to add additional conditions to the hypothetical before you can even answer it, you've already filtered yourself out.
>>96434685I say that my character notices, and takes it back from him.
>>96434671Spammin threads to kill them only works on /v/ my guy. Every dipshit knows this. We're still on page 3, this fucking thread is gonna hit 500 replies before it archives and someone me is gonna make an exact copy of the OP as soon as it happens.
>>96430580>I'm not that kind of orc
>>96434690You must not be very intelligent.
>>96434707Fair enough. Viable answer.
>>96434707>GM has to roll but I don'tLmao
>>96434708Almost like it's a retarded thing to do and that it doesn't actually spare them the humiliation of acting aggressively retarded. I look forward to the next thread.
>>96434724Before you are allowed to comment on my intelligence or lack thereof, I'm gonna need you to tell me how you'd feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning.
>>96434444Is it worth playing nowadays for the first time? My experience with RPGs has always been pretty hit-or-miss but I'd be willing to give it a shot.
>>96434789>has always been pretty hit-or-missThen you'll LOVE Morrowind
>>96434789Yeah, go for it.
>>96434785>how you'd feel if you didn't have breakfastA kid stole it I'm actually pretty upset
>>96434789If you do play it, just remember when it came out and try to be conscious of what games were like before it existed. For it's time, it was incredible. Compared to games now, it will be less impressive in a lot of ways, and maybe more impressive in others.
>>96434789The graphics suckThe combat is at it's best when you're outright cheesing itYou can completely fuck up the main questline to be uncompletable very easilyThe magic system is completely brokenAnd there are numerous glitches and exploits that are extremely easy to stumble uponHands down the absolute best portrayal of a mortal peasant's ascension to godhood in all of human history, both inspite of and because of its flaws.
>>96434788Seems that way to me>>96434789Yes
Maybe?
>>96433827It's a losing battle between zoomers and trolls, we'll have to mentally accept the possibility that the original meaning will eventually be lost. I suppose we could always use a different term, like "Don't be a 'cunt', Dave.">>96434604Agitation is just another form of stimulation after all.
>>96434810>>96434854>t. retards who got filtered at the start of the game.
>>96434948Eating your keyboard is not beating the game and the expansions.
>>96434983Why are you butting into others' conversations?
>>96434785Hungry.
>>96434764Please try to follow the chain of conversation. Anon clarified the GM didn't roll. I don't expect I'd need to roll in that circumstance. Had the GM rolled, I'd clarify that I'd roll to forcibly take it back.
>>96434795Made me kek
>>96435131https://www.youtube.com/shorts/UTPRbSJbvJw?feature=share
>>96435739You say that, but I suggest you check your pocket. Despite all you've attempted, the Twinkie remains stolen. You check the local stores and find that all the twinkies are gone. Not that it matters, because your wallet is now empty. The GM has gotten the last laugh.
>>96435901If you have to keep telling yourself that, then it's obvious you're a loser
Oh I get it now. He's an Indian. He literally thinks this is clever. I hope he realizes someone else is fucking his sister while he's wasting time spamming replies in a dead thread
>>96436022He probably gets off to that
>>96435833>the GM checks his cupboard once everyone has gone>his twinkies:
>>96436275>his cupboard is filled to burst with rotting twinkies he has collected for decades. His source of energyLike Donkey Kong's banana hoard. The sign of a true GM.
>400+ replies...we are going to see this thread again aren't we...
>>96436406Anons can't help but respond to shit they know is stupid but angers them anyways
>>96436406To be fair, over 100 of those replies are the guy above just spamming low effort, passive aggressive faggotry because the twinkie shit sends him into a tard rage.
>>96436638Way to prove the point of the guy above you, you sad cunt
You, as the player, do not have the role of telling others if your point was proven or not.
>>96436727I was at least gonna wait til page 100 damn
>>9643673010* kek
>>96436638Do you lay awake at night dreaming of the day you actually BTFO anyone? I've never seen a more pathetic faggot try so hard to convince himself he's winning an argument over a hypothetical question that you just have to answer with a reasonable in character response.
What if this... what if this IS his in-character response?
>>96436761I think the reasonable response from the GM would be to kill him.
Lmao keep going, Jannie.
>dodgedBased>the guy who said Morrowind was shit ate the banHolyB A S E DASED
>>96436761>character gets his sweetroll stolen>character yells up at the heavens, asking why he's been denied his rollA surprisingly valid answer
>>96434789Read the strategy guide that would have come with the physical copy. There's a bunch of random little tips that would be in a modern tutorial there.
>>96431826Actually, it far more likely gets like this>steal something from whitey>kill him when he tries to call you out
>>96429532>>96431260I'd pass this test with stellar grades, but the humogous wave of bitchfits it caused it is truly something.It's honest the teegee's local "what if you didn't eat breakfast yesterday" variant, and it works! Ahahahaha!
>>96434679>Someone has stolen you character's bike, what is their response?
>>96431553>It's originally from reddit.Lol anon you tried. But you still fail the twinkie test.
>>96438608But what's the answer if you actually didn't eat breakfast yesterday, anon?
>>96438874Depends on how (You) would feel, isn't it? I habitually skip breakfasts. In fact I didn't eat breakfast yesterday anyway. And today.
