How is the new edition?Is it at least playable?I remember original being only marginally better than f.a.t.a.l. gameplay wise...
The new version is extremely playable. The old version is very playable. I have no idea what made you struggle with it.It's just basic d&d with a better economic framework.It's a game system designed for 12 year olds, how do you struggle??
>>96744160>woman warrior on the cover artlet me save you the timeit's woke trash
>>96744293Why are you even in /tg/?Woman on cover is literally classic of tabletop
>>96744293You should leave /tg/ as you are clearly too stupid to play tabletop games
>>96744858fuck off libtard soiboi
>>96744293>>96744604Saaar
>>96745418No u, retarded nogames /pol/tard.
>>96744293Even Varg's new system has an armed human (?) female on a cover.
>>96744160>How is the new edition?Same same, but different, but still same>Is it at least playable?Sure, the core elements work. The problem is that this is still ACKS, so it working =/= being good>I remember original being only marginally betterThis is marginally better than original. It's still extremely bloated and very poorly edited at the same time. It could easily drop third of the page count without any impact on the mechanics.Macris badly needs an editorAll in all, it's a thoroughly average and milquetoast 5/10 heartbreaker that tries to appeal both to normalfags and OSR crowd at once, failing to be good for either. But at this point, it doesn't matter, ACKS own fandom is cult-like, so it's a product for the acolytes.
>>96745532he is literally the "I know those sjws are pretty bad but you know who is also bad..." meme ever since he did his timepslibtards coping hard on their woke game
>>96746564Or maybe people like you are just retarded.
>>96744293... are you seriously this starved for attention?
>>96744160it's no masterpiece
>>96744160Meh/10.It's not bad. It's not good. It's not even average.It's simply meh
