Should magic be something anyone can learn with a bit of effort or be reserved for special cases?
There is no "should".
>>96766494Please give your thoughts on the matter first, instead of just posting an open-ended question with no context.
Accessibility is a big part of magic. If it’s too accessible then it loses its magic. It’s a consequence of exposure logic. Magic is a consequence of a lack of exposure.
Should cuckee fuck off? (Yes.)
>>96766494Magic should be an expression gifted chaotically and randomly to people. If everyone can do it, it ceases to be Magic. If it's tied to bloodline, you get eugenic Magocracies.
>>96766494>Non-subject thread to fill up the catalog with a pasta older than OPSee you by Thanksgiving, when this thread fill finally die, having 150 replies, 120 of which will be bumpfag
>>96766494BothAnyone can learn magic, but it comes more naturally to special cases.
Should zero effort prompt threads warrant a range ban?
>>96766602Absolutely. This guy would have been gone a fucking year ago if moot was still around.
Not posting your own thoughts on a topic or contributions along a request you post should be a bannable offense.
>>96766602Definitely, yes.
>puckee thread
>>96766511>>96766748>>96766867>>96766871
>>96766494Magic can only be learned by weirdos. Extreme personalities capable of bending the universe or atypical perspectives capable of navigating the path
>>96766494Kill yourself puckee.https://www.reddit.com/r/ImaginaryCharacters/comments/1m1li2z/phineas_gavran_wizard_apprentice_by_dennis/
>>96766515How would magical abilities stop being magic if they were readily accessible to more people?
>>96767064Incorrect. I don't hate fun. I hate retarded faggots like (you) and (OP).
>>96766494Magic belongs to the divine, the spiritual, not to mankind. Gods, faeries, demons, spirits, all of these have magic, often within a narrow focus. A human with such an entity for one parent may become either a demigod warrior, trickster or, with immense time and effort, a wizard capable of divining some glimpse of the future and a spell or two, but no more.
>>96766494Totally depends on the type of experience/story you're trying to create.
>>96766494If it’s genetic, why wouldn’t the ruling class be composed largely or entirely of mages?
>>96766511Oh, hello. You must be new here, and that's fine. But you do need to spend some time actually lurking and learning how the board works before you start trying to enforce your vision of board culture.Decades of history has proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that when asking the board about the various disparate opinions of the its userbase, posting their own opinion changes the thread. It is no longer about your or my opinions, it is only about the OPs. Also, historically, and proven back when the IP counter still existed, the OP usually posts his own opinion after one or two others are posted.Please respect lurk moar and learn to respect the concept of anonymity.
>>96767236Then, please, tell us what you find fun in the context of tabletop games and characters who learn magic.
>>96767228Do you not know what magic is? It’s not glowing blue goo, anon. You may as well call the black blood of the earth (yes fossil fuels) a form of corruptive sorcery.Magic is psychological. It’s the the mind’s eye butting heads with phenomena.
